The future of nursing education

Journal of Nursing Education

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 5-12

  Lindeman, Carol A ^a,b  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; FORECASTING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; MASS COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NURSING EDUCATION; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; REVIEW; UNITED STATES; WORK;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CURRICULUM; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; EDUCATION, NURSING; FACULTY, NURSING; FORECASTING; HEALTH CARE REFORM; HUMANS; JOB DESCRIPTION; MARKETING OF HEALTH SERVICES; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; TECHNOLOGY, MEDICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0033627890     PISSN: 00223158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. American Nurses' Association. (1995). Nursing, a social policy statement Washington, DC: American Nurses' Association.
2. Burbach, V., & Exstrom, S. (1999). Continued competency in Nebraska: Process and progress. Issues: A Newsletter of the National Council, 20(2), 5-11.
3. Canavan, K. (1996). New technologies propel nursing profession forward: nursing informatics offers limitless opportunities. The American Nurse, 28, 1-3.
4. Eagles, Z.E. (1999). Career transitions: Your future in nursing. Nurse Week, 12, 14-15.
5. Langenberg, D.N. (1997). Diplomas and degrees are obsolescent. The Chronicle of Higher Education, September 12, A64.
6. Lindeman, C.A. (2000). The changing role of faculty and dean: The impact of a market-driven higher education system. In N. Chaska (Ed.), The nursing profession: Tomorrow's vision. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. In press.
7. McBride, A.B. (1999) Breakthroughs in nursing education: Looking back, looking forward. Nursing Outlook, 47(30), 114-119.
8. O'Nell, E.N., & the Pew Health Professions Commission. (1998). Recreating health professional practice for a new century. San Francisco, CA: Pew Health Professions Commission.
9. Schroeder, S.A. (1996). The triumph of the market. Robert Wood Johnson Annual Report. Princeton, NJ: The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
10. Schmidt, P. (1999a). New tuition and budget polices force public colleges to compete for students. The Chronicle of Higher Education, June 25, A40-41.
11. Schmidt, P. (1999b). A state transforms colleges with performance funding. The Chronicle of Higher Education, July 2, A26-28.
12. Strosnider, K. (1997). An aggressive, for-profit university challenges traditional colleges nationwide. The Chronicle of Higher Education, June 6, A32-33.
13. Sullivan, E.J. (1997). A changing higher education environment. Journal of Professional Nursing, 13(3), 143-149.
14. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1996). Occupational outlook quarterly. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
15. Van Dusen, G.C. (1997). The virtual campus: Technology and reform in higher education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report. Vol 25, No. 5. Washington, DC: The George Washington University.
16. Young, J.R. (1997). Rethinking the role of the professor in an age of high-tech tools. The Chronicle of Higher Education, October 3, A26-28.