|
|
|
Volumn 78, Issue 230, 2000, Pages 64-65
|
|
A forced choice comfort study of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% versus ketotifen fumarate 0.05%
|
|
Author keywords
Ketotifen fumarate; Olopatadine hydrochloride; Ophthalmic anti allergic agents
|
|
Indexed keywords
KETOTIFEN FUMARATE;
OLOPATADINE;
DIBENZOXEPIN DERIVATIVE;
EYE DROPS;
HISTAMINE H1 RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST;
KETOTIFEN;
ARTICLE;
BURN;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE;
DRUG CHOICE;
DRUG EFFECT;
DRUG FORMULATION;
DRUG INSTILLATION;
EYE IRRITATION;
HUMAN;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MULTICENTER STUDY;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
ALLERGIC CONJUNCTIVITIS;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONJUNCTIVA;
DECISION MAKING;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
CHOICE BEHAVIOR;
CONJUNCTIVA;
CONJUNCTIVITIS, ALLERGIC;
DIBENZOXEPINS;
DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD;
HISTAMINE H1 ANTAGONISTS;
HUMANS;
KETOTIFEN;
OPHTHALMIC SOLUTIONS;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
|
|
EID: 0033626454
PISSN: 13953931
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (39)
|
|
References (2)
|
