Comparison of electrodessication with CO2 laser for the treatment of actinic cheilitis

Dermatologic Surgery

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 349-353

  Laws, Richard A ^a,d   Wilde, Joseph L ^b   Grabski, William J ^c  

^a Dermatology Service   (United States)

^b Departments of Family Medicine   (United States)

^c Dermatology Associates of Tyler   (United States)

^d NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARBON DIOXIDE LASER; CHEILITIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DESICCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LASER SURGERY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRECANCER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOUND HEALING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTROSURGERY; LIP TUMOR; MIDDLE AGED; SUNLIGHT;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHEILITIS; ELECTROSURGERY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LASER SURGERY; LIP NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS; SUNLIGHT; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 0033624820     PISSN: 10760512     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2000.99286.x     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Dufresne RG, Curlin MU. Actinic cheilitis a treatment review. Dermatol Surg 1997;23:15-21.
2. Laws RA, Wilde JL, Grahski WJ. Scroll shaped electrode for the treatment of actinic cheilitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000;42: in press.
3. Diwan R, Skouge JW. A comparison of electrosurgery and the carbon dioxide laser for the treatment of actinic cheilitis [abstract]. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1990;16:80.
4. Robinson JK. Actinic cheilitis: a prospective study comparing four treatment methods. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;115: 848-52.
5. Green KA, Burd E, Nishioka NS, Bruggemann H, Ing D, Compton CC. Middermal wound healing. Arch Dermatol 1992;128:639-45.
6. Fitzpatrick RE, Tope WD, Goldman MP, Satur NM. Pulsed carbon dioxide laser, trichloroacetic acid, Baker-Gordon phenol, and dermabrasion: a comparative clinical and histologic study of cutaneous resurfacing in a porcine model. Arch Dermatol 1996;132:469-71.