Organ doses, detriment and genetic risk from interventional vascular procedures in Malaga (Spain)

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 14-23

  Ruiz Cruces, Rafael ^a   Perez Martinez, Manuel ^a   Tort Ausina, Isabel ^a   Muñoz, Vicente ^b   Martinez Morillo, Manuel ^a   Diez De Los Ríos, Antonio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO VIRGEN DE LA VICTORIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Genetic risk; Interventional vascular procedures; Organ doses

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANGIOPLASTY; ARTERIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CATHETERIZATION; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GENETIC RISK; HUMAN; MALE; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; SPAIN; VASCULAR DISEASE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; GENES; GONADS; HUMANS; LIFE EXPECTANCY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS, RADIATION-INDUCED; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIATION EFFECTS; RADIATION INJURIES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; RADIOLOGY, INTERVENTIONAL; RISK FACTORS;

ANGIOGRAPHY; DOSIMETRY; HEALTH RISKS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

DIGITAL ANGIOGRAPHY;

X RAY RADIOGRAPHY;

EID: 0033622764     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0720-048X(99)00070-4     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. United National Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionising Radiation. Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation to the General Assembly, with annexes. E94.IX.2. United Nations sales publication. New York, 1993.
2. European Commission. EURATOM Official Bulletin 97/43. Protection of the health as compared to the risks derived from the ionising radiation in medical expositions. OB n° L180, 1997:22-27.
3. ICRP-60. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP, 1991;21:1-201.
4. Baüml A, Bauer B, Bernhard J.H, Stieve F.E, Veit R, Zeitlberger I. Joint WHO/ISH workshop on efficacy and radiation safety in interventional radiology. Munich, Neuherberg, Germany, 1997.
5. Marshall N.W., Noble J., Faulkner K. Patient and staff dosimetry in neuroradiology. Br J Radiol. 68:1995;495-501.
6. Balter S, Shope TB. Syllabus: A Categorical Course in Physics: Physical and Technical Aspects of Angiography and Interventional Radiology. 81st Scientific Assembly. RSNA, UK, 1995.
7. Ruiz-Cruces R., Pérez M., Martín-Palanca A., Flores A., Cristófol J., Martínez M., DiezdelosRíos A. Patient dose in radiologically guided interventional vascular procedures: conventional versus digital systems. Radiology. 205:1997;385-393.
8. Hart D, Jones DG, Wall BF. Estimation of effective dose in diagnostic radiology from entrance surface dose and dose-area product measurements. National Radiological Protection Board Report no. 262. Chilton, UK. National Radiological Protection Board 1994:1-57.
9. Statistic Institute of Andalusia. Census of the population of Andalusia, Seville, Spain (IEA), 1997.
10. United National Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation Risk. Ionising Radiation: Levels and Effects. Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation to the General Assembly, with annexes. United Nations sales publication. E.72.IX.17 and 18. New York, 1972.
11. Taylor, FE. Estimation of child expectancy for the population of the United Kingdom in 1974 to be used in the calculation of genetically significant dose. National Radiological Protection Board publication no. M49. Chilton, UK. National Radiological Protection Board 1980:1-13.
12. Wall, BF. Radiation Quantities used in Patient Dosimetry. Advanced seminar on diagnostic radiology dosimetry. Ispra 1987.
13. National Statistics Institute of Spain. Natural movement of populations. Madrid, Spain. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, 1992.
14. National Council Radiological Protection. Principles and Application of Collective Dose in Radiation Protection. NCRP Reports no. 121, Bethesda, USA. National Council Radiological Protection publications, 1995.
15. Prosser, SL. Collective Dose Determination Based on Environmental Monitoring. National Radiological Protection Board-M764, Chilton, UK. National Radiological Protection Board 1997.
16. International Atomic Energy Agency. Radiological protection glossary. Safety series no. 76, Vienna, Austria. International Atomic Energy Agency publications, 1986.
17. Wall, BF. Radiation Dosimetry Techniques in Diagnostic Radiology. The Institute of Physical Sciences in Medicine, 1988.
18. Pérez M., Ruiz-Cruces R., Martínez-Morillo M., Diez de los Ríos A. Organ doses, detriment and genetic risk from simple X-ray examinations in Malaga (Spain). Eur. J. Radiol. 25:1997;55-61.
19. United National Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionising Radiation. Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation to the General Assembly, with annexes. E88.IX.7. United Nations sales publication. New York, 1988.
20. Vaño E., González L., Calzado A. Some indicative parameters on diagnostic radiology in Spain: first dose examinations. Br. J. Radiol. 62:1989;20-26.
21. National Council Radiological Protection. Uncertainties in Fatal Cancer Risk Estimates Used in Radiation Protection. NCRP Reports no. 126, Bethesda, USA. National Council Radiological Protection publications, 1997.
22. National Council Radiological Protection. Risk Estimates for Radiation Protection. NCRP Reports no. 115, Bethesda, USA. National Council Radiological Protection publications, 1993.
23. Nikiforov AM, Slozina NM, Neronova EG, Kharchenko TV, Drygina LB, Strukov EL. Estimate of radiation detriment long period after exposure to low doses of ionising radiation: Chromosomal aberrations in liquidators 6-10 years after the Chernobyl accident. International Atomic Energy Agency TECDOC no. 976, Vienna, Austria. International Atomic Energy Agency publications 1997:383-386.
24. Cox R, Muirhead CR, Stather JW, Edwards AA, Little, M. Risk of radiation-induced Cancer at Low Doses and Low Dose Rates For Radiation Protection Purposes. National Radiological Protection Board Documents 6, no. 1, Chilton, UK. National Radiological Protection Board, 1995.