Impact of toxicity dose-response relationships on quantitative risk analysis results

Process Safety Progress

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 91-97

  Ferguson, Jeffrey S ^a   Hendershot, Dennis C ^a  

^a ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; CODES (STANDARDS); RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK PERCEPTION; TOXICITY;

QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS; TOXICITY DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION;

CHEMICAL PLANT; DOSAGE; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOXICITY;

EID: 0033622660     PISSN: 10668527     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prs.680190208     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), "Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis," American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York (1989).
2. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), "Guidelines for Consequence Analysis of Chemical Releases," American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York (1999).
3. Schubach, S. "Comparison of probit expressions for the prediction of lethality due to toxic exposure," J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 8 (4), pp. 197-204 (1995).
4. ten Berge, W. F., A. Zwart, and L. M. Appelman, "Concentration-time mortality response relationship of irritant and systemically acting vapours and gases," J. Haz. Materials, 13, pp. 301-309 (1986).
5. 50 testing," Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 15, pp. 278-290 (1992).
6. Withers, R. M. J., and F. P. Lees, "The assessment of major hazards: The lethal toxicity of chlorine, Part 1, Review of information on toxicity and Part 2, Model of toxicity to man," J. Haz. Materials., 12, pp. 231-282 and 283-302 (1985).