Fracture interpretation using electronic presentation: A comparison

Journal of Digital Imaging

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 13-18

  Bancroft, Laura W ^a   Berquist, Thomas H ^a   Morin, Richard L ^a   Pietan, Jerald H ^a   Knudsen, John M ^a   Williams Jr , Hugh J ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC RADIOGRAPHY; FRACTURE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

FRACTURE INTERPRETATION; PICTURE ARCHIVING AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (PACS);

DIGITAL IMAGE STORAGE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; FRACTURE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; CHILD; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; FRACTURES, BONE; HUMANS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0033622097     PISSN: 08971889     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03168335     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Scott WW, Bluemke DA, Mysko WK, et al: Interpretation of emergency department radiographs by radiologists and emergency medicine physicians: Teleradiology workstations versus radiograph readings. Radiology 195:223-229, 1995
2. Wilson AJ, Hodge JC: Digitized radiographs in skeletal trauma: A performance comparison between a digital workstation and the original film images. Radiology 196:565-568, 1995
3. Murphy MD, Bramble JM, Cook LT, et al: Nondisplaced fractures: Spatial resolution requirements for detection with digital skeletal imaging. Radiology 174:865-870, 1990
4. Scott WW, Rosenbaum JE, Ackerman SJ, et al: Subtle orthopaedic fractures: Teleradiology workstation versus film interpretation. Radiology 187:811-815, 1993