Surface characteristics and energy fluxes above different plant canopies

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Volumn 98-99, Issue , 1999, Pages 491-500

  Hurtalova T ^a   Matejka, F ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF CHEMISTRY   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

Aerodynamic characteristics; Energy transfer; Plant canopies; Surface parameters

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL LAND; CANOPY EXCHANGE; ENERGY FLUX; MICROMETEOROLOGY; RESEARCH PROGRAM;

EID: 0033621435     PISSN: 01681923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1923(99)00118-5     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Baldocchi D.D., Luxmoore R.J., Hatfield J.L. Discerning the forest from the trees: an essay on scaling canopy stomatal conductance. Agric. For. Meteorol. 54:1991;197-226.
2. Brutsaert, W., 1982. Evaporation into the Atmosphere. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dodrecht, 269 pp.
3. Choudhury B.J., Idso S.B. Evaluating plant and canopy resistances of field grawn wheat from concurrent diurnal observations of leaf water potential, stomatal resistance, canopy temperature and evapotranspiration flux. Agric. For. Meteorol. 34:1985;67-76.
4. Delworth T.L., Manabe S. The influence of soil wettness on near surface atmospheric variability. J. Clim. 2:1989;1447-1462.
5. Duynkerke P.G. The roughness length for heat and other vegetation parameters for a surface of short grass. J. Appl. Meteor. 31:1992;579-586.
6. Gash J.H.G., Stewart J.B. The average surface resistance of a pine forest derived from Bowen ratio measurements. Boundary-Layer Met. 8:1975;453-464.
7. Halldin, S., Gottschalk, L., de Griend, A., Gryning, S.E., Heikinheimo, M., Högstrom, U., Jochum, A., Lundin, L.C., 1995. Science plan for NOPEX. NOPEX Technical Report No. 12, Uppsala University, NOPEX Central Office, Uppsala, 38 pp.
8. Halldin, S., Gryning, S.E., Gottschalk, L., Jochum, A., Lundin, L.C., Van de Griend, A.A., 1999. Energy, water and carbon exchange in a boreal forest - NOPEX experiences. Agric. For. Meteorol. 98-99, 5-29.
9. Hayashi, Y., 1983. Aerodynamical properties of an air layer affected by vegetation. Environm. Res. Center Papers 6, 54 pp.
10. Hoppmann, U., Roth, R., 1991. LOTREX/HIBE Experimentbericht. Report. Hannover University, 62 pp.
11. Hurtalová T. Aerodynamical air properties over a winter wheat. Contr. Geophys. Inst. SAS. Ser. Meteorol. 9:1989;106-118.
12. Hurtalová, T., 1998. Influence of dynamic roughness and wind speed on sensible heat flux. Contr. Geophys. Inst. SAS, Ser. Meteorol., 18, 56-64.
13. Hurtalová, T., Matejka, F., 1995. Aerodynamical properties of air layer affected by different crop canopies. NOPEX Technical Report No. 11, Geophys. Inst. SAS., Bratislava, 25 pp.
14. Hurtalová T., Moriconi M.L. Characteristics of turbulent transfer in the maize stand-environment system. Z. Meteorol. 38(6):1988;357-360.
15. Iritz Z., Lindroth A. Night-time evaporation from a short-rotation willow stand. J. Hydrology. 157:1994;235-245.
16. Jarvis, P.G., 1980. Stomatal conductance, gaseous exchange and transpiration. In: Grace, J., Ford, D.E., Jarvis, P.G. (Eds.), Plants and their Atmospheric Environment. Blackwell Scientific Publication, London, pp. 175-204.
17. Jones, H.G., 1983. Plants and microclimate. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 323 pp.
18. Lundin, L.C., Halldin, S., 1995. Field phase report for NOPEX Concentrated Field Effort 1 (CFE1). NOPEX Technical Report No. 14. Uppsala University. NOPEX Central Office, Uppsala, 96 pp.
19. Maki T. Aerodynamic characteristics of wind within and above plant canopy and interrelationship between aerodynamic parameters and plant canopy height. Bull. Nat. Inst. Agric. Sci. A. 23:1976;1-89.
20. Monin A.S., Obukhov A.M. Basic regularities of the turbulent transport in the atmosphere surface layer (in Russian). Trudy GGI. 24(151):1954;163-186.
21. Monteith, J.L., 1965. Evaporation and environment. In: Fogg, G.E. (Ed.), The State and Movement of Water in Living Organisms. Academic Press, New York, pp. 205-234.
22. Moore K.E., Fitzgerald D.R., Ritter J.A. How well can regional fluxes be derived from smaller-scales estimates? J. Geophys. Res. 98:1993;7187-7198.
23. Norman, J., M., Jarvis, P.G.,Berry, J., Kaufman, M. Raschke, K., Halldin, S., Lynn, B., 1989. Parametrizations of leaf stomatal conductance response function. In: Price, J. (Ed.), Procceedings of the Workshop on Stomatal Resistance. Formulation and its Application to Modelling of Transpiration. Pensylvania State University, pp. 81-90.
24. Plate, E.J., 1971. Aerodynamic characteristics of atmospheric boundary layers. AEC Critical Review Series, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Div. Tech. Info., 190 pp.
25. Sakai R.K., Fitzjarald D.R., Moore K.E. Detecting leaf and surface resistance during transition seasons. Agric. For. Meteorol. 84:1997;273-284.
26. Sellers P.J., Hall F.G., Asrar G., Strebel D.E., Murphy R.E. An overview of the First International Satellite Land Surface Climatology Project (ISLSCP) Field Experiment (FIFE). J. Geophys. Res. 97:1992;18.345-18.371.
27. Stewart J.B., Verma S.B. Comparison of surface fluxes and conductances at two contrasting sites within the FIFE area. J. Geophys. Res. 97:1992;18.623-18.628.
28. Tan C.S., Black T.A. Factors affecting the canopy resistance of a Douglas-fir forest. Boundary Layer Met. 10:1976;475-488.
29. Tanner C.B., Pelton W.L. Potential evapotranspiration estimates by approximate energy balance method of Penman. J. Geophys. Res. 65:1960;3391-3413.
30. Wesely M.L. Parametrization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional scale numerical models. Atm. Environ. 23:1989;1293-1304.
31. Walmsley J.L., Wesely M.L. Modification of model parametrizations of surface resistance in gaseous dry deposition. Atm. Environ. 30:1996;1181-1185.