Visible region magnetic linear dichroism spectra of ferrocytochrome c and deoxymyoglobin: Demonstration of a new tool for the study of metalloproteins

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 121, Issue 25, 1999, Pages 5972-5980

  Peterson, Jim ^a   Pearce, Linda L ^b   Bominaar, Emile L ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME C; DEOXYHEMOGLOBIN; HEMOPROTEIN; METALLOPROTEIN;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CHROMATOPHORE; CIRCULAR DICHROISM; LINEAR DICHROISM; SPECTROPHOTOMETER;

EID: 0033618075     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja990174k     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Vala, M.; Rivoal, J.-C.; Grisolia, C.; Pyka, J. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 82, 4376-4377.
2. Rivoal, J. C.; Zoueu, J.; Blanchard, X.; Nahoum, R.; Eyring, M.; Pyka, M.; Vala, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 101, 2684-2692.
3. Stephens, P. J.; Sutherland, J. C.; Cheng, J. C.; Eaton, W. A. In The Excited States of Biological Molecules; Birks, J. B., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 1976; Chapter D8, pp 434-442.
4. Vickery, L. E. Methods Enzymol. 1978, 54, 284-302.
5. Johnson, M. K.; Robinson, A. E.; Thomson, A. J. In Iron-Sulfur Proteins; Spiro, T. G., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 1982; Chapter 10, pp 367-406.
6. Dooley, D. M.; Dawson, J. H. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1984, 60, 1-66.
7. Dawson, J. H.; Dooley, D. M. In Iron Porphyrins, Part III; Lever, A. B. P., Gray, H. B., Eds.; Physical Bioinorganic Chemistry Series; VCH: New York, 1989; Chapter 1, pp 3-135.
8. Cheesman, M. R.; Greenwood, C.; Thomson, A. J. Adv. Inorg. Chem. 1991, 36, 201-255.
9. Thomson, A. J.; Cheesman, M. R.; George, S. J. Methods Enzymol. 1993, 226, 199-232.
10. Solomon, E. I.; Pavel, E. G.; Loeb, K. E.; Campochiaro, C. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1995, 144, 369-460.
11. Sutherland, J. C. Methods Enzymol. 1995, 246, 110-131.
12. Kreglewski, M.; Vala, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1981, 74, 5411-5419.
13. Bominaar, E. L.; Achim, C.; Peterson, J. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109, 942-950.
14. Gerstman, B.; Austin, R. H.; Hopfield, J. J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1981, 47, 1636-1639.
15. Margoliash, E.; Frohwirt, N. Biochem. J. 1959, 71, 570-572.
16. Antonini, E. Physiol. Rev. 1965, 45, 123-170.
17. Nordén, B.; Davidsson, Ȧ. Acta Chem. Scand. 1972, 26, 842-844.
18. Davidsson, Ȧ.; Nordén, B. Chem. Scr. 1976, 9, 49-53.
19. Stephens, P. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1970, 52, 3489-3516.
20. Stephens, P. J. Adv. Chem. Phys. 1976, 35, 197-264.
21. Platt, J. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1949, 17, 484-495.
22. Platt, J. R. In Radiation Biology; Hollander, A., Ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1956; Vol. 3, p 17.
23. In general, the Soret band is difficult to measure at low temperature without severe distortion as it is invariably superimposed upon a sloping baseline due to Rayleigh scattering from the microstructure of the frozen glass. The scattering rapidly increases in the near-ultraviolet, and consequently, even at concentrations more dilute than those employed in the present study, samples are opaque (or nearly so) in the Soret region. Therefore, for most practical purposes, the reliable recording of this absorption band at cryogenic temperatures in semiaqueous glasses intended primarily for magnetooptical measurements is precluded.
24. Simpson, W. T. J. Chem. Phys. 1949, 17, 1218-1221.
25. Kuhn, H. J. Chem. Phys. 1949, 17, 1198-1212.
26. Kobayashi, H. J. Chem. Phys. 1959, 30, 1361-1362.
27. (a) Gouterman, M. In The Porphyrins Physical Chemistry, Part A; Dolphin, D., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1978; Vol. III, pp 1-165.
28. (b) Gouterman, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1960, 33, 11523-11529.
29. (c) Gouterman, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1959, 30, 1139-1161.
30. It might not be appropriate to simply attribute the band shape of Figure 4C to the temperature-dependent terms in eq 1, since this expression was derived to describe transitions from either singlet ground states or degenerate manifolds under nonsaturating conditions.
31. Oganesyan, V. S.; Sharonov, Y. A. Spectrochim. Acta 1997, A53, 433-449.
32. Sharonov, Y. A.; Figlovsky, V. A.; Sharonova, N. A.; Mineyev, A. P. Biophys. Struct. Mech. 1983, 10, 47-59.
33. Longuet-Higgins, H. C.; Rector, C. W.; Platt, J. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1950, 18, 1174-1181.
34. 2h point groups.
35. u parentage of the singlet states and more clearly associate these states with the coordinate axes of the molecular frame.
36. Sutherland, J. C.; Axelrod, D.; Klein, M. P. J. Chem. Phys. 1971, 54, 2888-2898.
37. 2 term in eq 1.
38. Barth, G.; Linder, R. E.; Bunnenberg, E.; Djerassi, C.; Seamans L.; Moscowitz, A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1974, 2, 1706-1711.
39. Nordén, B. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 1978, 14, 157-248.
40. -1. The shoulder observed near the maximum of the Q band in Figure 3A is due to differences in either bandwidths or amplitudes associated with the two transitions, which are close to the limit of resolution.
41. Dratz, E. A. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 1966.
42. Sutherland, J. C.; Klein, M. P. J. Chem. Phys. 1972, 57, 76-85.
43. Bominaar, E. L.; Peterson, J. Manuscript in preparation.
44. Greenwood, C.; Foote, N.; Peterson, J.; Thomson, A. J. Biochem. J. 1984, 223, 379-391.
45. Greenwood, C.; Foote, N.; Peterson, J.; Thomson, A. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1985, 13, 625-626.