A decision support software for safely conducting research with genetically modified fish and shellfish

Aquaculture

Volumn 173, Issue 1-4, 1999, Pages 309-318

  Hallerman, Eric ^a   King, Doug ^a   Kapuscinski, Anne ^b  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Biotechnology; Decision making; Microcomputers; Risk assessment; Risk management

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAM; FISH; GENETIC ENGINEERING; RISK MANAGEMENT; SHELLFISH;

EID: 0033616548     PISSN: 00448486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0044-8486(98)00454-2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. ABRAC (Agricultural Biotechnology Research Advisory Committee, US Department of Agriculture), 1995a. Performance standards for safely conducting research with genetically modified fish and shellfish: I. Introduction and supporting text for flow charts, Document 95-04. Biotechnology Information Center, National Agricultural Library, 10301 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
2. ABRAC (Agricultural Biotechnology Research Advisory Committee, US Department of Agriculture), 1995b. Performance standards for safely conducting research with genetically modified fish and shellfish: II. Flow charts and accompanying worksheets, Document 95-05. Biotechnology Information Center, National Agricultural Library, 10301 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
3. Department of the Environment (United Kingdom), 1994. Genetic modification of fish - a UK perspective. HMSO, London.
4. Devlin, R., Yesaki, T., Biagi, C., Smailus, D., Farrell, A., Swanson, P., 1997. Production and evaluation of transgenic salmonids. World Aquaculture '97, Seattle, Washington, USA, 19-23 February 1997, abstract #132.
5. Dunham, R.A., 1996. Results of early pond-based studies of risk assessment regarding aquatic GMOs. Abstract #381, 126th Annual Meeting of the American Fisheries Society, Dearborn, Michigan, USA, 25-29 August, 1996, p. 147.
6. Edmonds Institute, 1996. Draft: Assessment of Genetically Engineered Organisms in the Environment: The Puget Sound Workshop Biosafety Handbook. The Edmonds Institute, 20319 92nd Avenue West, Edmonds, WA 98020, USA.
7. Hallerman E.M., Kapuscinski A.R. Transgenic fish and public policy: regulatory concerns. Fisheries. 15(1):1990;12-20.
8. Hallerman, E.M., Kapuscinski, A.R., 1993. Potential impacts of transgenic and genetically manipulated fish on natural populations, Addressing the uncertainties through field testing. In: Cloud, J.G., Thorgaard, G.H. (Eds.). Genetic Conservation of Salmonid Fishes. Plenum, New York, pp. 93-112.
9. Hindar K. Genetically engineered fish and their possible environmental impact. NINA Oppdragsmelding. 215:1993;1-48.
10. ISB (Information Systems for Biotechnology), 1996. Computer software for Performance Standards for Safely Conducting Research With Genetically Modified Fish and Shellfish, version 1.0. ISB, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0208, USA. Internet: http://www.nbiap.vt.edu.
11. Muir, W.M., Howard, R.D., Martens, R., Bidwell, C., 1996. Results of early laboratory-based studies of risk assessment regarding aquatic GMOs. Abstract #382, 126th Annual Meeting of the American Fisheries Society, Dearborn, Michigan, USA, 25-29 August, 1996, pp. 146-148.
12. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-ordination and Development), 1995. Environmental impacts of aquatic biotechnology. Publ. No. 48321, OECD Publications, 2 rue Andre Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16.
13. OSTP (Office of Science and Technology Policy), 1986. Coordinated Framework for the regulation of biotechnology. Federal Register, 51, 23301-23350, 26 June.