Diurnal and annual exchanges of mass and energy between an aspen-hazelnut forest and the atmosphere: Testing the mathematical model Ecosys with data from the BOREAS experiment

Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Volumn 104, Issue D22, 1999, Pages 27699-27717

  Grant, R F ^a   Black, T A ^b   Den Hartog, G ^c   Berry, J A ^d   Neumann, H H ^c   Blanken, P D ^b   Yang, P C ^b   Russell, C ^e   Nalder, I A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c ENVIRONMENT CANADA   (Canada)

^d GEOPHYSICAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORYLUS;

ATMOSPHERE-BIOSPHERE INTERACTION; CARBON; DIURNAL VARIATION; ENERGY FLUX; TEMPORAL VARIATION;

CANADA;

EID: 0033610981     PISSN: 01480227     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/1998JD200117     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. 2 enrichment, Proc. Soil Crop Sci. Soc. Fla., 49, 192-198, 1990.
2. Ball, J. T., An analysis of stomatal conductance, 89 pp., Ph.D. thesis, Stanford Univ., Calif., 1988.
3. Black, T. A., et al., Annual cycles of water vapour and carbon dioxide fluxes in and above a boreal aspen forest, Global Change Biol., 2, 219-229, 1996.
4. Blanken, P. D., T. A. Black, P. C. Yang, H. H. Neumann, Z. Nesic, R. Staebler, G. den Hartog, M. D. Novak, and X. Lee, Energy balance and canopy conductance of a boreal aspen forest: Partitioning over-story and understory components, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 28,915-28,927, 1997.
5. Bonan, G. B., K. J. Davis, D. Baldocchi, D. Fitzjarrald, and H. Neumann, Comparison of NCAR LSM1 land surface model with BOREAS aspen and jack pine tower fluxes, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 29,065-29,075, 1997.
6. 2 by some agricultural and forest soils, Can. J. Microbiol., 15, 899-905, 1969.
7. Campbell, J. S., V. J. Lieffers, and E. C. Pielou, Regression equations for estimating single tree biomass of trembling aspen: Assessing their applicability to more than one population, For. Ecol. Manage., 11, 283-295, 1985.
8. Chaudhuri, U. N., M. B. Kirkham, and E. T. Kanemasu, Carbon dioxide and water level effects on yield and water use of winter wheat, Agron. J., 82, 637-641, 1990.
9. Chen, J. M., P. D. Blanken, T. A. Black, M. Guilbeault, and S. Chen, Radiation regime and canopy architecture in a boreal aspen forest, Agric. For. Meteorol., 86, 107-125, 1997.
10. Choudhury, B. J., and J. L. Monteith, A four-layer model for the heat budget of homogenous land surfaces, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 114, 373-398, 1988.
11. Cowan, I. R., Transport of water in the soil-plant-atmosphere system, J. Appl. Ecol., 2, 221-239, 1965.
12. Curtis, P. S., A meta-analysis of leaf gas exchange and nitrogen in trees grown under elevated carbon dioxide, Plant Cell Environ., 19, 127-137, 1996.
13. Dang, Q. L., H. A. Margolis, S. Y. Mikailou, M. R. Coyea, G. J. Collatz, and C. L. Walthall, Profiles of photosynthetically active radiation, nitrogen, and photosynthetic capacity in the boreal forest: Implications for scaling from leaf to canopy, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 28,845-28,860, 1997.
14. 3 species, Planta, 149, 78-90, 1980.
15. Frolking, S., Sensitivity of spruce/moss boreal forest net ecosystem productivity to seasonal anomalies in weather, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 29,053-29,064, 1997.
16. Gollan, T., J. B. Passioura, and R. Munns, Soil water status affects the stomatal conductance of fully turgid wheat and sunflower leaves, Aust. J. Plant Phys., 13, 459-464, 1986.
17. Gower, S. T., J. G. Vogel, T. K. Stow, J. M. Norman, C. J. Kucharik, and S. J. Steele, Carbon distribution and aboveground net-primary production in aspen, jack pine, and black spruce stands in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, Canada, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 29,029-29,042, 1997.
18. Grant, R. F., Dynamic simulation of phase changes in snowpacks and soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 56, 1051-1062, 1992.
19. Grant, R. F., Simulation model of soil compaction and root growth, I, Model development, Plant Soil, 150, 1-14, 1993a.
20. Grant, R. F., Simulation model of soil compaction and root growth, II, Model testing, Plant Soil, 150, 15-24, 1993b.
21. Grant, R. F., Rhizodeposition by crop plants and its relationship to microbial activity and nitrogen distribution, Mod. Geol. Biol. Proc., 2, 193-209, 1993c.
22. Grant, R. F., Simulation of competition between barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and wild oat (Avena fatua L.) under different managements and climates, Ecol. Model., 71, 269-287, 1994a.
23. Grant, R. F., Simulation of ecological controls on nitrification, Soil Biol. Biochem., 26, 305-315, 1994b.
24. Grant, R. F., Mathematical modelling of nitrous oxide evolution during nitrification, Soil Biol. Biochem., 27, 1117-1125, 1995.
25. Grant, R. F., Ecosys, in Global Change and Terrestrial Ecosystems Focus 3 Wheat Network, Model and Experimental Metadata, 2nd ed., pp. 65-74, GCTE Focus 3 Off., NERC Cent. for Ecol. and Hydrol., Wallingford, Oxon, England, 1996a.
26. Grant, R. F., Ecosys, in Global Change and Terrestrial Ecosystems Task 3.3.1 Soil Organic Matter Network (SOMNET): 1996 Model and Experimental Metadata, pp. 19-24, GCTE Focus 3 Off., NERC Cent. for Ecol. and Hydrol., Wallingford, Oxon, England, 1996b.
27. Grant, R. F., Changes in soil organic matter under different tillage and rotation: Mathematical modelling in ecosys, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 61; 1159-1174, 1997.
28. Grant, R. F., Simulation in ecosys of root growth response to contrasting soil water and nitrogen, Ecol. Model., 107, 237-264, 1998a.
29. Grant, R. F., Simulation of methanogenesis in the mathematical model ecosys, Soil Biol. Biochem., 30, 883-896, 1988b.
30. Grant, R. F., Simulation of methanotrophy in the mathematical model ecosys, Soil Biol. Biochem., 31, 287-297, 1999.
31. Grant, R. F., and D. D. Baldocchi, Energy transfer over crop canopies: Simulation and experimental verification, Agric. For. Meteorol., 61, 129-149, 1992.
32. Grant, R. F., and D. J. Heaney, Inorganic phosphorus transformation and transport in soils: Mathematical modelling ecosys, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 61, 752-764, 1997.
33. Grant, R. F., and J. D. Hesketh, Canopy structure of maize (Zea mays L.) at different populations: Simulation and experimental verification, Biotronics, 21, 11-24, 1992.
34. Grant, R. F., and E. Pattey, Mathematical modelling of nitrous oxide emissions from an agricultural field during spring thaw, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, in press, 1999.
35. Grant, R. F., and J. A. Robertson, Phosphorus uptake by root systems: Mathematical modelling in ecosys, Plant Soil, 188, 279-297, 1997.
36. Grant, R. F., and P. Rochette, Soil microbial respiration at different temperatures and water potentials: Theory and mathematical modelling, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 58, 1681-1690, 1994.
37. Grant, R. F., N. G. Juma, and W. B. McGill, Simulation of carbon and nitrogen transformations in soils, I, Mineralization, Soil Biol. Biochem., 27, 1317-1329, 1993a.
38. Grant, R. F., N. G. Juma, and W. B. McGill, Simulation of carbon and nitrogen transformations in soils, II, Microbial biomass and metabolic products, Soil Biol. Biochem., 27, 1331-1338, 1993b.
39. Grant, R. F., M. Nyborg, and J. Laidlaw, Evolution of nitrous oxide from soil, I, Model development, Soil Sci., 156, 259-265, 1993c.
40. Grant, R. F., M. Nyborg, and J. Laidlaw, Evolution of nitrous oxide from soil, II, Experimental results and model testing, Soil Sci., 156, 266-277, 1993d.
41. Grant, R. F., P. Rochette, and R. L. Desjardins, Energy exchange and water use efficiency of crops in the field: Validation of a simulation model, Agron. J., 85, 916-928, 1993e.
42. Grant, R. F., R. C. Izaurralde, and D. S. Chanasyk, Soil temperature under different surface managements: Testing a simulation model, Agric. For. Meteorol., 73, 89-113, 1995b.
43. 2 Enrichment (FACE) experiment, Agron. J., 87, 446-457, 1995c.
44. 2 and temperature in ecosys, in Soil Processes and the Carbon Cycle, edited by R. Lal, J. M. Kimble, R. F. Follet, and B. A. Stewart, pp. 527-547, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 1997.
45. 2 Enrichment (FACE) experiment, Agric. For. Meteorol., in press, 1998.
46. Halliwell, D. H., M. J. Apps, and D. T. Price, A survey of the forest site characteristics in a transect through the central Canadian boreal forest, Water Air Soil Pollut., 82, 257-270, 1995.
47. Hogg, E. H., and P. A. Hurdle, Sap flow in trembling aspen: Implications for stomatal responses to vapor pressure deficit, Tree Physiol., 17, 501-509, 1997.
48. 2 enrichment on plant growth: The interactive effect of air temperature, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 20, 1-10, 1987.
49. Itoh, S., and S. A. Barber, Phosphorus uptake by six plant species as related to root hairs, Agron. J., 75, 457-461, 1983.
50. 2 emissions from soils in response to global warming, Nature, 351, 304-306, 1991.
51. 2 specificity of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase, Planta, 161, 308-313, 1984.
52. 2 concentration, Nature, 318, 218-221, 1996.
53. 2 concentration, J. Agric. Meteorol, 48, 559-566, 1993.
54. Kimball, J. S., P. E. Thornton, M. A. White, and S. W. Running, Simulating forest productivity and surface-atmosphere carbon exchange in the BOREAS study region, Tree Physiol., 17, 589-599, 1997.
55. Kirby, C. L., W. S. Bailey, and J. G. Gilmour, The growth and yield of aspen in Saskatchewan, Tech. Bull. 3, Dep. of Nat. Resour., Saskatchewan, 1957.
56. Kirschbaum, M. U. F., The temperature dependence of soil organic matter decomposition and the effect of global warming on soil organic C storage, Soil Biol. Biochem., 27, 753-760, 1995.
57. Lavigne, M. B., and M. G. Ryan, Growth and maintenance respiration rates of aspen, black spruce and jack pine stems at northern and southern BOREAS sites, Tree Physiol., 17, 543-551, 1997.
58. Margolis, H. A., and M. G. Ryan, A physiological basis for biosphere-atmosphere interactions in the boreal forest: An overview, Tree Physiol., 17, 491-499, 1997.
59. Parton, W. J., J. M. O. Scurlock, D. S. Ojima, D. S. Schimel, D. O. Hall, and SCOPEGRAM group members, Impact of climate change on grassland production and soil carbon worldwide, Global Change Biol., 1, 13-22, 1995.
60. Perrier, A., Land surface processes: Vegetation, in Atmospheric General Circulation Models, edited by P. S. Eagleson, pp. 395-448, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1982.
61. Reid, J. B., and M. G. Huck, Diurnal variation of crop hydraulic resistance: A new analysis, Agron. J., 82, 827-834, 1990.
62. Rogers, H. H., J. D. Cure, and J. M. Smith, Soybean growth and yield response to elevated carbon dioxide, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 16, 113-128, 1986.
63. 2 on the global climate, Science, 271, 1402-1406, 1996.
64. Shewchuk, S. R., Surface mesoscale meteorological system for BOREAS, in Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, pp. 42-44, Am. Meteorol. Soc., Boston, Mass., 1996.
65. Sinclair, T. R., C. E. Murphy, and K. R. Knoerr, Development and evaluation of simplified models for simulating canopy photosynthesis and transpiration, J. Appl. Ecol., 13, 813-829, 1976.
66. Steele, S. J., S. T. Gower, J. G. Vogel, and J. M. Norman, Root mass, net primary production and turnover in aspen, jack pine and black spruce forests in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, Canada, Tree Physiol., 17, 577-587, 1997.
67. 2 levels and their potential significance for carbon flow in photosynthetic cells, Plant Cell Environ., 14, 741-762, 1991.
68. Trofymow, J. A., C. M. Preston, and C. E. Prescott, Litter quality and its potential effect on decay rates of materials from Canadian forests, Water Air Soil Pollut., 82, 215-226, 1995.