Reactions with radioactive ion beams

Nuclear Physics A

Volumn 654, Issue 1-2, 1999, Pages C235-C251

  Tanihata, Isao ^a  

^a RIKEN   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033606761     PISSN: 03759474     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0375-9474(99)00256-0     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. 1. I. Tanihata et al., Phys. Letters B 160 (1985) 380.
2. 2. I. Tanihata et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 55 ( 1985) 2676.
3. 3. I. Tanihata et al., Phys. Letters B 206 (1988) 592.
4. 4. M. Obuti et al., Nucl. Phys. A 609 (1996) 74.
5. 5. A. Ozawa et al., Nucl. Phys. A 608 (1996) 63.
6. 6. A. Ozawa et al., Phys. Letters B 334 (1994) 18.
7. 7. L. Chulkov et al., Nucl. Phys. A 603 (1994) 219-237.
8. 8. T. Suzuki et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 75 (1995) 3241.
9. 9. T. Suzuki et al., Nucl. Phys. A 630 (1998) 661-677.
10. 10. A. Ozawa and T. Suzuki, private communications.
11. 11. Recently Alkalili et al. pointed out that the optical limit of the calculation may be under estimating the radii of halo nuclei. They proposed the(core+halo neutron) model for the interaction cross sections. In the figure, however, the results of optical limit calculations are shown. It is simply because the detailed analysis of these halo nuclei have not been sufficiently made. The detailed analysis of all halo nuclei are presently in progress. J. S Al-Khalili and J. A. Tostevin, Phys. Rev. Letters 21 (1996) 3903, J. S Al-Khalili, J. A. Tostevin, and I.-J. Thompson Phys. Rev. C 54 (1996) 1843.
12. 11. Recently Alkalili et al. pointed out that the optical limit of the calculation may be under estimating the radii of halo nuclei. They proposed the(core+halo neutron) model for the interaction cross sections. In the figure, however, the results of optical limit calculations are shown. It is simply because the detailed analysis of these halo nuclei have not been sufficiently made. The detailed analysis of all halo nuclei are presently in progress. J. S Al-Khalili and J. A. Tostevin, Phys. Rev. Letters 21 (1996) 3903, J. S Al-Khalili, J. A. Tostevin, and I.-J. Thompson Phys. Rev. C 54 (1996) 1843.
13. 12. I. Tanihata et al., Phys. Letters B 206 (1988) 475.
14. 13. D. Bazin et al., Phys. Rev. C 57 (1998) 2156. D. Bazin et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 74 (1995) 3569.
15. 13. D. Bazin et al., Phys. Rev. C 57 (1998) 2156. D. Bazin et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 74 (1995) 3569.
16. 18C P// distribution. T. Baumann et al., Phys. Letters B 439 (1998) 256. It does not agree with the MSU data and shows wider momentum distribution as seen in the Fig. 6. Taking the error bars of each data points of the momentum distribution in the MSU data, the momentum distributions themselves does not contradict strongly with each other. However the fitting has to be made again to update.
17. 15. H. Sakurai et al., Phys. Letters B (1999) in press.
18. 16. S. Kox et al., Phys. Rev. C 35 (1987) 1678.
19. 17. Y. Ogawa, K. Yabana, and Y. Suzuki, Nucl. Phys. A543 (1992) 722.
20. 18. M. J. G. Borge et al., Phys. Letters B 317 (1993) 25.
21. 19. Ozawa et al., J. Physics G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 24 (1998) 143.
22. 20. K. Ikeda, Nucl. Phys. A538 (1992) 355c.
23. 21. T. Kobayashi et al., Phys. Letters B 232 (1989) 51.
24. 22. T. Nakamura et al., Phys. Letters B 331 (1994) 296.
25. 23. C. -B. Moon et al., Phys. Letters, B 297 (1992) 39. A. A. Korsheninnikov al., Phys. Rev. C 53 (1996) R537.
26. 23. C. -B. Moon et al., Phys. Letters, B 297 (1992) 39. A. A. Korsheninnikov al., Phys. Rev. C 53 (1996) R537.
27. 24. T. Kobayashi et al., Nucl. Phys. A538 (1992) 343c.
28. 25. A. A. Korsheninnikov et al., Physical Review Letters, 78 (1997) 2317.
29. 26. K. Ieki et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 70 (1993) 730.
30. 27. S. Shimoura et al., Phys. Letters B 348 (1995) 29-34
31. 28. Zinser et al., Nucl. Phys. A 619 (1997) 15. H. Emling, J. Phys. G.: Nucl. Part. Phys. 24 (1998) 1561.
32. 28. Zinser et al., Nucl. Phys. A 619 (1997) 15. H. Emling, J. Phys. G.: Nucl. Part. Phys. 24 (1998) 1561.
33. 29. Y. Sugawara private communication.
34. 30. K. Oyamatsu Nuclear Physics A 634 (1998) 3.
35. 31. T. Motobayashi et al., Phys. Letters B 346 (1995) 9.