-
3
-
-
0029643780
-
-
b) Renaud J-P, Rochel N, Ruff M, Vivat V, Chambon P, Gronemyer H, Moras D. Nature 1995;378:681-689.
-
(1995)
Nature
, vol.378
, pp. 681-689
-
-
Renaud, J.-P.1
Rochel, N.2
Ruff, M.3
Vivat, V.4
Chambon, P.5
Gronemyer, H.6
Moras, D.7
-
4
-
-
8944263299
-
-
[3] Yamamoto K, Sun WY, Ohta M, Hamada K, DeLuca HP, Yamada S. J. Med. Chem. 1996;39:2727-2737.
-
(1996)
J. Med. Chem.
, vol.39
, pp. 2727-2737
-
-
Yamamoto, K.1
Sun, W.Y.2
Ohta, M.3
Hamada, K.4
DeLuca, H.P.5
Yamada, S.6
-
6
-
-
0015805917
-
-
[5] a) Havinga E. Experientia 1973;29:1181-1193;
-
(1973)
Experientia
, vol.29
, pp. 1181-1193
-
-
Havinga, E.1
-
10
-
-
0022458426
-
-
[7] Andrews DR, Barton DHR, Chen KP, Finet J-P, Hesse R, Johnson G, Pechet MM. J. Org. Chem. 1986;51:1635-1637.
-
(1986)
J. Org. Chem.
, vol.51
, pp. 1635-1637
-
-
Andrews, D.R.1
Barton, D.H.R.2
Chen, K.P.3
Finet, J.-P.4
Hesse, R.5
Johnson, G.6
Pechet, M.M.7
-
12
-
-
0013570668
-
-
note
-
+ 17); 434 (34); 323 (56); 305 (18); 135 (100). UV λmax (95 % EtOH): 271 nm.
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
36849142348
-
-
19F NMR spectra of 2 and 3 were assigned on the basis of the spectra of rigid difluorosteroid derivatives 5 - 8: In the spectra of 5 and 6, which have both an α-OH group and an α-double bond, the fluorine signals appear in the following order of increasing shielding: (1) axial F with an anri-parallel OH and a parallel π-bond orbital (-82.6), (2) axial with a cis-OH and a parallel π-bond orbital (-98.1 ), (3) equatorial with a cis-OR and an orthogonal π-orbital (-115.0), and (4) equatorial with a trans-OH and an orthogonal π-orbital (-116.5), while in the spectra of 7 and 8, which have only an α-OH group, the order is: (1) equatorial F with a cis-OH (-106.9), (2) equatorial with a trans-OH (-108.5), (3) axial with an anri-parallel α-OH (-112.1), and (4) axial with a cis-OH (-126.4). Thus, the signals in the spectra shown in Fig. 1b can be assigned as follows: the lowest signal (-92.9) to 4α-F and its partner (-119.8) to 4β-F in the β-form; the highest signal (-121.2) to 4α-F and its partner (-108.1) to4β-F in the α-form: a) Bovey FA, Anderson EW, Hood FP, Kornegay RL. J. Chem. Phys. 1964;40:3099-3109;
-
(1964)
J. Chem. Phys.
, vol.40
, pp. 3099-3109
-
-
Bovey, F.A.1
Anderson, E.W.2
Hood, F.P.3
Kornegay, R.L.4
-
15
-
-
0013625732
-
-
note
-
[11] The two conformers in 3 can be distinguished by the signals of the proton at C-3 (δ 3.72 and 3.90; an 8:2 ratio), the major signal in higher field being attributed to the axial C-3 proton in the α-conformation and the minor in lower field to the equatorial C-3 proton in the β-conformation.
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
84981904438
-
-
[13] The free energy of activation at coalescence was calculated by using the following approximate equation: AG ‡=Tc(45.63 + 1.98721nTc/Δv) where Tc is the coalescence temperature, and Δv is the chemical shift difference in hertz at Tc: Kessler H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1970;9:219-235.
-
(1970)
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.
, vol.9
, pp. 219-235
-
-
Kessler, H.1
|