![]() |
Volumn 319, Issue 7213, 1999, Pages 796-797
|
Should cases of permanent vegetative state still go to court?: Britain should follow other countries and keep the courts for cases of dispute
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
COURT;
DECISION MAKING;
EDITORIAL;
EUTHANASIA;
HYDRATION;
NUTRITION;
PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
UNITED KINGDOM;
UNITED STATES;
ARTIFICIAL FEEDING;
BRITISH MEDICAL ASSOCIATION;
CLINICAL APPROACH/SOURCE;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
ENGLAND;
GREAT BRITAIN;
JUDICIAL ACTION;
LEGAL APPROACH;
PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS;
SCOTLAND;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HUMANS;
JUDICIAL ROLE;
PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE;
REFUSAL TO TREAT;
WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;
|
EID: 0033604067
PISSN: 09598138
EISSN: 14685833
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.319.7213.796 Document Type: Editorial |
Times cited : (4)
|
References (11)
|