Photoperiod and temperature effect on growth of strawberry plant (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.): Development of a morphological test to assess the dormancy induction

Scientia Horticulturae

Volumn 82, Issue 3-4, 1999, Pages 217-226

  Robert, Fabien ^a   Risser, Georgette ^b   Pétel, Gilles ^a  

^a Physiol Integree l'Arbre F   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Dormancy; Fragaria; Growth; Morphological test; Petiole length; Strawberry

Indexed keywords

DORMANCY; GROWTH; HORTICULTURE; PHOTOPERIOD; TEMPERATURE EFFECT;

FRAGARIA;

EID: 0033599053     PISSN: 03044238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4238(99)00054-0     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Arney S.E. Studies of growth and development in the genus Fragaria. IV. Winter growth. Ann. Bot. 74:1955;265-276.
2. Arney S.E. Studies of growth and development in the genus Fragaria. VI. The effect of photoperiod and temperature on leaf size. J. Exp. Bot. 7:1956;65-79.
3. Bailey, J.S., Rossi, A.W., 1964. Effect of fall chilling, forcing temperature and day length on the growth and flowering of Catskill strawberry plants. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 7, pp. 245-252.
4. Chouard P. About effect of photoperiod on growth (in French). C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris. 223:1946;1174-1176.
5. Chouard, P., 1956. Forcing and temperature-photoperiod preparations. In: Tournier and Constans (Eds), Dormancy and inhibition of seeds and buds (in French). Centre de Docum. Univ., Paris, pp. 1-160.
6. Darrow G.M., Waldo G.F. Photoperiodism as a cause of the rest period in strawberries. Science. 77:1933;353-354.
7. Darrow G.M., Waldo G.F. Responses of strawberry varieties and species to duration of the daily light period. USDA Tech. Bul. 453:1934;1-31.
8. Dennis F.G., Lipecki J., Kiang C.L. Effects of photoperiod and other factors upon flowering and runner development of three strawberry cultivars. J Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 95:1970;750-754.
9. Durner E.F., Poling E.B. Flower bud induction, initiation, differentiation and development in the 'Earliglow' Strawberry. Sci. Hort. 31:1987;61-69.
10. Durner E.F., Barden J.A., Himelrick D.G., Poling E.B. Photoperiod and temperature effects on flower and runner development in day-neutral, junebearing, and everbearing strawberries. J. Amer. Soc. Horti. Sci. 109:1984;396-400.
11. Gosselink J.G., Smith C.R. Vegetative growth responses of strawberry plants to differing photoperiods. Hort. Res. 7:1966;24-33.
12. Guttridge C.G. The effect of winter chilling on the subsequent growth and development of the cultivated strawberry plant. J. Hort. Sci. 33:1958;119-127.
13. Guttridge, C.G., 1968. Hormone physiology of growth regulation in strawberry. In: Plant growth Regulators, S.C.I. Monograph. 31, pp. 157-169.
14. Heide O.M. Photoperiod and interactions in growth and flowering of strawberry. Physiol. Plant. 40:1977;21-26.
15. Jonkers H. On the flower formation, the dormancy and the early forcing of strawberries. Med Landbwg Wageningen. 65:1965;1-71.
16. Piringer A.A., Scott D.H. Interrelation of photoperiod, chilling, and flower-cluster and runner production by strawberries. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 84:1964;295-301.
17. Risser G., Robert F. What cold treatments promote growth in strawberry? Acta Hortic. 48:1993;381-383.
18. Smeets L. Effect of temperature and daylength on flower initiation and runner formation in two everbearing strawberry cultivars. Sci. Hortic. 12:1980;19-26.