Artificial neural networks improve the prediction of mortality in intracerebral hemorrhage

Neurology

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 351-357

  Edwards, Dorothy F ^a   Hollingsworth, Holly ^a   Zazulia, Allyson R ^a   Diringer, Michael N ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MORTALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0033595274     PISSN: 00283878     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.53.2.351     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Dixon AA, Holness RO, Howes WJ, Garner JB. Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: an analysis of factors affecting prognosis. Can J Neurol Sci 1985;12:267-271.
2. Portenoy RK, Lipton RB, Berger AR, Lesser ML, Lantos G. Intracerebral hemorrhage: a model for the prediction of outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987;50:976-979.
3. Tuhrim S, Dambrosia JM, Price TR, et al. Prediction of intracerebral hemorrhage survival. Ann Neurol 1988;24:258-263.
4. Young WB, Lee KP, Pessin MS, Kwan ES, Rand WM, Caplan LR. Prognostic significance of ventricular blood in supratentorial hemorrhage: a volumetric study. Neurology 1990;40: 616-619.
5. Daverat P, Castel JP, Dartigues JF, Orgogozo JM. Death and functional outcome after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 1991;22:1-6.
6. Lisk DR, Pasteur MD, Rhoades H, Putnam RD, Grotta JC. Early presentation of hemispheric intracerebral hemorrhage: prediction of outcome and guidelines for treatment allocation. Neurology 1994;44:133-139.
7. Tuhrim S, Horowitz DR, Sacher M, Godbold JH. Validation and comparison of models predicting survival following intracerebral hemorrhage. Crit Care Med 1995;23:950-954.
8. Juvela S. Risk factors for impaired outcome after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Arch Neurol 1995;52:1193-2000.
9. Ruscalleda J, Peiro A. Prognostic factors in intraparenchymatous hematoma with ventricular hemorrhage. Neuroradiology 1968;28:34-37.
10. Chung CS, Caplan LR, Han W, Pessin MS, Lee KH, Kim JM. Thalamic hemorrhage. Brain 1996;119:1873-1886.
11. Terayama Y, Tanahashi N, Fukuuchi Y, Gotoh F. Prognostic value of admission blood pressure in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 1997;28:1185-1188.
12. Fieschi C, Carolei A, Fiorelli M, et al. Changing prognosis of primary intracerebral hemorrhage: results of a clinical and computed tomographic follow-up study of 104 patients. Stroke 1988;19:192-195.
13. Diringer MN, Edwards DF, Zazulia AR. Hydrocephalus: a previously unrecognized predictor of poor outcome from supertentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 1998;29:1352-1357.
14. Cross SS, Harrison RF, Kennedy RL. Introduction to neural networks. Lancet 1995;346:1075-1079.
15. Cohen J, Cohen P. Applied multiple regression: correlational analyses for the behavioral sciences. New York: Erhlebaum, 1983.
16. Buchman TG, Kubos KL, Seidler AJ, Siegforth MJ. A comparison of statistical and connectionist models for the prediction of chronicity in a surgical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1994;22:750-762.
17. Baxt WG. Use of an artificial neural network for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med 1991;115:843-848.
18. Baxt WG. A neural network trained to identify the presence of myocardial infarction bases some decisions on clinical associations that differ from accepted clinical teaching. Med Decis Making 1994;14:217-222.
19. Burke HB. Artificial neural networks for cancer research: outcome prediction. Semin Surg Oncol 1994;10:73-79.
20. Wilding P, Morgan MA, Grygotis AE, Shoffner MA, Rosato EF. Application of backpropagation neural networks to the diagnosis of breast and ovarian cancer. Cancer Lett 1994;77: 145-153.
21. Snow PB, Smith DS, Catalona WJ. Artificial neural networks in the diagnosis and prediction of prostate cancer: a pilot study. J Urol 1994;152:1923-1926.
22. Naguib RN, Robinson MC, Neal DE, Hamdy FC. Neural network analysis of combined conventional and experimental prognostic markers in prostate cancer: a pilot study. Br J Cancer 1998;78:246-250.
23. Oczkowski WJ, Barreca S. Neural network modeling accurately predicts the functional outcome of stroke survivors with moderate disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78: 340-345.
24. Rutledge R, Osler T, Emery S, Kromhaut-Schiro S. The end of the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and the Trauma Severity Score (TRISS): an international classification of diseases, ninth revision-based prediction tool outperforms both TRISS and ISS as predictors of trauma patient survival, hospital charges, and hospital length of stay. J Trauma 1998;44:41-49.
25. French BM, Dawson MR, Dobbs AR. Classification and staging of dementia of the Alzheimer type: a comparison between neural networks and linear discriminant analysis. Arch Neurol 1997;54:1001-1009.
26. Paczynski RP. Osmotic therapy: basic concepts and controversies. Crit Care Clin 1997;13:105-130.
27. Yu YL, Kumana CR, Lauder IJ, et al. Treatment of acute intracerebral hemorrhage with intravenous glycerol: a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Stroke 1992;23: 967-971.
28. Powers WJ. Acute hypertension after stroke: the scientific basis for treatment decisions. Neurology 1993;43:461-467.
29. Diringer MN. Intracerebral hemorrhage: pathophysiology and management. Crit Care Med 1993;21:1591-1603.
30. Broderick JP, Brott TG, Duldner JE, Tomsick T, Huster G. Volume of intracerebral hemorrhage: a powerful and easy-to-use predictor of 30-day mortality. Stroke 1993;24:987-993.
31. SAS Institute Inc. SASStat users guide for Windows, version 6.12. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc, 1995.
32. Statsoft Inc. Statistica for Windows. Tulsa, OK: Statsoft Inc, 1995.
33. Baxt WG, Skora J. Prospective validation of artificial neural network trained to identify acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1996;347:12-15.
34. Hart A, Wyatt J. Evaluating black boxes as medical decision aids: issues arising from a study of neural networks. Med Inf (Lond) 1990;15:229-236.
35. Burke HB, Goodman PH, Rosen DB, et al. Artificial neural networks improve the accuracy of cancer survival prediction. Cancer 1997;79:857-862.