|
|
Volumn 159, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 545-550
|
|
The rule of double effect: Clearing up the double talk
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
MORPHINE;
OPIATE;
ANALGESIA;
DYING;
EUTHANASIA;
HUMAN;
LAW;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
MORALITY;
NOTE;
PATIENT CARE;
PATIENT RIGHT;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RELIGION;
RESUSCITATION;
SEDATION;
SOCIETY;
TERMINAL DISEASE;
ANALYTICAL APPROACH;
AUTONOMY;
CLINICAL APPROACH/SOURCE;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DOUBLE EFFECT;
INTENTION;
LAW;
MORAL COMPLICITY;
MORALITY;
SEDATIVES;
COMPLICITY;
DEVELOPED COUNTRIES;
DOUBLE EFFECT;
ETHICS;
ETHICS, MEDICAL;
EUTHANASIA;
EUTHANASIA, ACTIVE;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
FREEDOM;
HUMANS;
INTENTION;
MORALS;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
RELIGION;
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY;
SUICIDE, ASSISTED;
UNITED STATES;
WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;
|
|
EID: 0033594177
PISSN: 00039926
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.159.6.545 Document Type: Note |
|
Times cited : (191)
|
|
References (44)
|
