Influence of the number of days spent training in an abattoir with access to live cows on the efficiency of do-it-yourself artificial insemination

Veterinary Record

Volumn 144, Issue 12, 1999, Pages 310-314

  Howells, H M J ^a   Davies, D A R ^b   Dobson, H ^b  

^a Four Dales Veterinary Practice   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; CATTLE; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PREGNANCY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SLAUGHTERHOUSE; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME; UNITED KINGDOM;

ABATTOIRS; ANIMALS; CATTLE; EDUCATION, VETERINARY; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; PREGNANCY; QUESTIONNAIRES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0033586131     PISSN: 00424900     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/vr.144.12.310     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. EEC Decision 96/239/EC as amended 11/6/96
2. ESSLEMONT, R. J. & KOSSAIBATI, M. A. (1995) Wastage in Dairy Herds. DAISY - The Dairy Information System. Report No. 4. University of Reading
3. GRAHAM, E. F. (1966) The use of a dye indicator for testing, training and evaluating technicians in AI. Proceedings of the First Technical Conference on Artificial Insemination and Bovine Reproduction. pp 57-60
4. HOWELLS, H. M. J. (1996) Do it yourself artificial insemination: the influence of the number of training days spent in an abattoir with access to live cows upon success. Diploma in Bovine Reproduction Dissertation, The University of Liverpool
5. MAFF (1984, 1994) Chief Veterinary Officer's Reports
6. MAFF (1985) Artificial Insemination of Cattle (England and Wales) Regulations (1985), Inset 29 (VOs) Appendix 7 - DIY insemination training courses
7. RILEY, J. (1990) Getting the most from your data: a handbook of practical ideas on how to analyse qualitative data. Bristol, Technical and Educational Services
8. WHITE, M. B. (1985) The Impact of DIY Insemination. Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Societies of Animal Production. p 296