|
Volumn 84, Issue 4 SUPPL. 1, 1999, Pages 1-2
|
Can physicians always explain the results of clinical trials? A case study of amlodipine in heart failure
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
AMLODIPINE;
CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKING AGENT;
ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT;
VASODILATOR AGENT;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
HEART FAILURE;
HUMAN;
PHYSICIAN;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
CONFERENCE PAPER;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DRUG EFFECT;
DRUG EFFICACY;
EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE;
MORTALITY;
SURVIVAL;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
AMLODIPINE;
ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENTS;
CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS;
HEART FAILURE, CONGESTIVE;
HUMANS;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;
SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
VASODILATOR AGENTS;
|
EID: 0033584261
PISSN: 00029149
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00358-6 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (10)
|
References (0)
|