Construction of bicyclo[2.2.2]octane ring system via homoallyl-homoallyl radical rearrangement

Tetrahedron Letters

Volumn 40, Issue 8, 1999, Pages 1551-1554

  Toyota, Masahiro ^a   Yokota, Masahiro ^a   Ihara, Masataka ^a  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BICYCLO[2.2.2]OCTANE DERIVATIVE; CYCLOHEXENE DERIVATIVE; FREE RADICAL;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL REACTION; CYCLIZATION; STEREOCHEMISTRY; SYNTHESIS;

EID: 0033582602     PISSN: 00404039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4039(98)02708-7     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. D. Griller, K. Ingold, Acc. Chem. Res. 1980, 13, 317-323.
2. a) B. Giese in Radicals in Organic Synthesis: Formation of Carbon-Carbon Bonds, Vol. 5 (Eds.: J. E. Baldwin), Pergamon, Oxford, 1986;
3. b) B. Giese, B. Kopping, T. Gobel, J. Dickhaut, G. Thoma, K. J. Kulicke, F. Trach, Org. React. 1956, 48, pp. 301-856;
4. c) D. P. Curran, N. A. Porter, B. Giese in Stereochemistry of Radical Reactions, VCH, Weinheim, 1996.
5. P. Dowd, W. Zhang, Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 2091-2115.
6. a) M. Newcomb, A. G. Glein, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 275;
7. b) M. Newcomb, C. C. Johnson, M B. Manek, T. R. Varick, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10915.
8. L. M. Harwood in Polar Rearrangements, Vol. 5 (Eds.: S. G. Davies), Oxford University Press, New York, 1992.
9. D. C. Nonhebel, Chem. Soc. Rev, 1993, 22, 347-359.
10. M. Toyota, T. Wada, K. Fukumoto, M. Ihara, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4916-4925.
11. G. Stork, R. Mook, Jr, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 2829-2831.
12. a) D. P. Curran, C.-T. Chang J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 3140-3157;
13. b) V. Yadav, A. G. Fallis, Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 3283-3286;
14. c) D. L. Boger, R. J. Mathvink, J. Org. Chem, 1992, 57, 1429-1443.
15. J. Klein, Israel J. Chem, 1963, 1, 385-390.
16. R. Mook, Jr, P, M, Sher, Org. Synth. Coll. Vol. 8, 1993, 381-386.
17. 1H-NMR, IR, MS spectra and elemental analyses.
18. N. Fusetani, H. J. Wolstenholme, S. Matsunaga, Tetrahedron Lett, 1990, 31, 5623-5624.
19. A. H. Kapadi, R. R. Sobti, S. Dev, Tetrahedron Lett, 1965, 2729-2735.
20. a) C. Djerassi, H. Budzikiewicz, R. J. Owellen, J. M. Wilson, W. G. Kump, D. J. Le Count, A. R. Battersby, H. Schmid, Helv. Chim. Acta. 1963, 46, 742-751;;
21. b) B. W. Bycroft, D. Schumann, M. B. Patel, H. Schmid, ibid, 1964, 47, 1147-1152.
22. 1H-COSY NMR experiments. Enhancements, shown in Figure II, were proofs of the proposed structure. This result indicates that the ratio of the products (13 and 14) depends on the stability of the intermediates (7 and 9) in the equilibration. Figure II (equation presented).
23. a) N. L. Bauld, Radicals, Ion Radicals, and Triplets: The Spin-Bearing Intermediates of Organic Chemistry, Wiley-VCH, New York, 1997, p. 14;
24. b) A. Srikrishna, R. Viswajanani, T. J. Reddy, D. Vijaykumar, P. P. Kumar, J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 5232-5234.
25. At this stage, the other products such as monocyclized unsaturated compound were oxidized to give the corresponding carbonyl compounds. Although 35% yield, the isolation of the monobenzyl-substituted cyclopropane product is a rare case.