To recognize, correctly read and understand scientific accounts: The art of selecting and interpreting medical publications;Wissenschaftliches erkennen, richtig lesen und verstehen: Die kunst der auswahl und interpretation medizinischer veroffentlichungen

Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift

Volumn 124, Issue 24, 1999, Pages 773-779

  Stinner, Benno ^a   Goldschmidt, A J W ^b   Celik, I ^b   Rothmund, M ^b  

^a Klin fur Allgemeinchirurgie der P   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT REPORT; ALGORITHM; COMPREHENSION; DATA ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; READING; REVIEW; STANDARD;

EID: 0033580801     PISSN: 00120472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1024411     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. 1 Altman, D. G.: Better reporting of randomised trials: The CONSORT statement. Brit. med. J. 313 (1996), 570-571.
2. 2 Balk, R., R. Bone: Methodological issues in the design and implementation of controlled clinical trials in severe sepsis and septic shock. Theoret. Surg. 9 (1994), 32-37.
3. 3 Cantekin, E. I., T. W. McGuire, R. L. Potter: Biomedical information, peer review, and conflict of interest as they influence public health. J. Amer. med. Ass. 263 (1990), 1427-1430.
4. 4 Chalmers, I., M. Adams, K. Dickersin, J. Hetherington, W. Tarnow-Mordi, C. Meinert, S. Tonascia, T. C. Chalmers: A cohort study of summary reports on controlled trials. J. Amer. med. Ass. 263 (1990), 1401-1405.
5. 5 Chalmers, I: Underreporting research is scientific misconduct. J. Amer. med. Ass. 263 (1990), 1405-1408.
6. 6 DerSimonian, R., L. J. Charette, B. McPeek, F. Mosteller: Reporting on methods in clinical trials. New Engl. J. Med. 306 (1982), 1332-1337.
7. 7 DI Trocchio, F.: Newtons Koffer, Geniale Außenseiter, die die Wissenschaft blamierten. (Campus, Frankfurt a.M. 1998).
8. 8 Emerson, J. D., B. McPeek, F. Mosteller: Reporting clinical trials in general surgical journals. Surgery 95 (1984), 572-579.
9. 9 Evans, M., V. Pollock: Trials on trial. Arch. Surg. 119 (1984), 109-113.
10. 10 Gardner, M. J., J. Bond: An exploratory study of statistical assessment of papers published in the British Medical Journal. J. Amer. med. Ass. 263 (1990), 1355-1357.
11. 11 Goldman, L., A. Loscalzo: Fate of cardiology research originally published in abstract form. New Engl. J. Med. 303 (1980), 255-259.
12. 12 International Committee of Medical Journal Editors: Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Ann. intern. Med. 108 (1988), 258-265.
13. 13 Lorenz, W., D. Duda , W. Dick, H. Sitter, A. Doenicke, A. Black, D. Weber, H. Menke, B. Stinner, Th. Junginger, M. Rothmund, Ch. Ohmann, M. J. R. Healy: Incidence and clinical importance of perioperative histamine release: randomised study of volume loading and antihistamines after induction of anaesthesia. Lancet 343 (1994) , 933-940.
14. 14 Nobel, J. J.: Comparison of research quality guidelines in academic and nonacademic environments. J. Amer. med. Ass. 263 (1990), 1435-1437.
15. 15 Pfeifer, M. P., G. L. Snodgrass: The continued use of retracted invalid scientific literature. J. Amer. med. Ass. 263 (1990), 1420-1423.
16. 16 Troidl, H., M. F. McKneally, D. S. Mulder, A. S. Wechsler, B. McPeek, W. O. Spitzer: Surgical Research: Basic Principles and Clinical Practice, 3. ed. (Springer: Berlin 1998).
17. 17 Yancey, J. M.: Ten rules for reading clinical research reports. Amer. J. Surg. 159 (1990), 533-339.