Frogs of the genus Paratelmatobius (Anura: Leptodactylidae) with descriptions of two new species

Copeia

Volumn , Issue 4, 1999, Pages 1014-1026

  Pombal Jr , José P ^a   Haddad, Célio F B ^b,c  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTECOLOGY; FROG; NEW SPECIES;

BRAZIL; SAO PAULO STATE;

ANURA; LEPTODACTYLIDAE; PARATELMATOBIUS; PARATELMATOBIUS POECILOGASTER;

EID: 0033579399     PISSN: 00458511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1447976     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. ALCALA, A. C. 1962. Breeding behavior and early development of frogs of Negros, Philippine Islands. Copeia 1962:679-726.
2. ALTIG, R. 1970. A key to the tadpoles of the continental United States and Canada. Herpetologica 26:180-207.
3. BOKERMANN, W. C. A. 1966. Lista Anotada das Localidades Tipo de Anfibios Brasileiros. RUSP, São Paulo.
4. BROWN JR., K. S., AND G. G. BROWN. 1992. Habitat alteration and species loss in Brazilian forests, p. 119-142. In: Tropical deforestation and species extinction. T. C. Whitmore and A. Sayer (eds.). Chapman and Hall, London.
5. CARDOSO, A. J., AND C. F. B. HADDAD. 1990. Redescrição e biologia de Paratelmatobius gaigeae (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Pap. Avul. Zool., S. Paulo 37:125-132.
6. CEI, J. M. 1980. Amphibians of Argentina. Monit. Zool. Ital. (N.S.). Monogr. 2:1-609.
7. COCHRAN, D. M. 1938. Diagnoses of new frogs from Brazil. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 51:41-42.
8. _. 1955. Frogs of southeastern Brazil. Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus. 206:1-423.
9. _. 1961. Type specimens of reptiles and amphibians in the U.S. National Museum. Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus. 220:1-291.
10. DUELLMAN, W. E. 1970. The liylid frogs of Middle America. Monogr. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Kans. 1:1-753.
11. FORMAS, J. R. 1976. Descriptions of Batrachyla (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae) tadpoles. J. Herpetol. 10:221-225.
12. GIARETTA, A. A., AND L. M. CASTANHO. 1990. Nova espécie de Paratelmatobius (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae) da Serra do Mar, Brasil. Pap. Avul. Zool., S. Paulo 37:133-139.
13. GOSNER, K. L. 1960. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183-190.
14. HEYER, W. R. 1976. The presumed tadpole of Paratelmatobius lutzi (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae). Pap. Avul. Zool., S. Paulo 30:133-135.
15. _, A. S. RAND, C. A. G. DA CRUZ, O. L. PEIXOTO, AND C. E. NELSON. 1990. Frogs of Boracéia. Arq. Zool., S. Paulo 31:231-410.
16. LEVITON, A.E., R. H. GIBBS JR., E. HEAL, AND C. E. DAWSON. 1985. Standards in herpetology and ichthyology. Part 1. Standard symbolic codes for institutional resource collections in herpetology and ichthyology. Part 2. Country/city index. Copeia 1985:802-829.
17. LUTZ, A., AND B. LUTZ. 1939. I Notes on the genus Phyllomedusa Wagler. (A) Observations on small Phyllomedusae without vomerine teeth or conspicuous paratoids found in the region of Rio de Janeiro. (B) Phyllomedusa bahiana Lutz. II. Mosquitos biting batrachians and phragmosis in casque headed frogs. Ann. Acad. Brasil. Sci. 9:219-263.
18. LUTZ, B. 1947. Trends towards non-aquatic and direct development in frogs. Copeia 1947:242-252.
19. _. 1948. Ontogenetic evolution in frogs. Evolution 2:29-39.
20. _, AND A. L. CARVALHO. 1958. Novos anfibios anuros das serras costeiras do Brasil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 56:239-249.
21. LYNCH, D. 1971. Evolutionary relationships, osteology, and zoogeography of leptodactyloid frogs. Univ. Kans. Mus. Nat. Hist. Misc. Publ. 53:1-238.
22. WASSERSUG, R. J., AND W. R. HEYER. 1988. A survey of internal oral features of leptodactyloid larvae (Amphibia: Anura). Smiths. Contrib. Zool. 457:1-99.
23. ZAR, J. H. 1996. Biostatistical analysis. 3d ed. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.