Ionic effects on the stereoselectivities of Diels-Alder reactions: The cyclopentadiene-methyl acrylate reaction in aqueous LiCl, NaCl, NaBr, CaCl2, LiClo4, and guanidinium chloride

Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn 64, Issue 19, 1999, Pages 7055-7060

  Pawar, Sanjay S ^a   Phalgune, Usha ^a   Kumar, Anil ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHEMICAL LABORATORY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER; CALCIUM CHLORIDE; CYCLOPENTADIENE DERIVATIVE; GUANIDINE; INORGANIC SALT; ION; LITHIUM CHLORIDE; LITHIUM DERIVATIVE; SODIUM BROMIDE; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SOLVENT;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL REACTION; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; REACTION ANALYSIS; SOLVATION; STEREOCHEMISTRY; SURFACE TENSION;

EID: 0033578842     PISSN: 00223263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jo990583z     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. (a) Pindur, U.; Lutz G.; Otto, C. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 741.
2. (b) Fringuelli, F.; Tatichi, A. Dienes in the Diels-Alder reactions; Wiley: New York, 1990 and references cited therein.
3. (c) Carruthers, W. Cycloaddition Reactions in Organic Synthesis; Pergamon: Oxford, 1990; see also references cited therein.
4. (d) Lubineau, A.; Auge, J.; Queneau, Y. Synthesis, 1994, 741.
5. Sauer, J. Sustmann, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1980, 19, 779
6. (a) Rideout, D.; Breslow, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 7816.
7. (b) Breslow, R.; Maitra, U.; Rideout, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 1901.
8. (c) Breslow, R. Acc. Chem. Res. 1991, 24, 159 and references cited therein.
9. (d) Breslow, R.; Guo, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5613.
10. 4 antihydrophobic ones.
11. For example see: (a) Blokzijl, W.; Engberts, J. B. F. N.; Blandamer, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 4241.
12. (b) Blokzijl, W.; Engberts, J. B. F. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1902, 114, 5440.
13. (c) Mersbergen, D.; van Wijnen, J. W.; Engberts, J. B. F. N. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 8801.
14. (d) Meijer, A.; Otto, S.; Engberts, J. B. F. N. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 8989 and references cited therein for their earlier contributions. also see:
15. (e) Schneider, H.; Sangwan, N. K. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1986, 1787.
16. (f) Schneider, H.; Sangwan, N. K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1987, 26, 8976. Other important references:
17. (h) Cativiela, C.; Mayroral, J. A.; Avenoza, A.; Peregrina, J. M.; Roy, M. A. J. Phys. Org. Chem, 1990, 3, 414.
18. (i) Cativiela, C.; Garcia, J. I.; Royo, A. J.; Salvatella, L.; Assefeld, Y.; Urz-Lopez, M. F. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 1992, 5, 230.
19. (j) Cativiela, C.; Garcia, J. I.; Mayrol, J. A.; Salvatella, L. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1994, 847 and references cited therein.
20. (k) See for an informative review: Cativiela, C.; Garcia, J. I.; Mayoral, J. A.; Salvatella, L. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1996, 209.
21. Grieco, P. A.; Nunes, J. J.; Gaul, M. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 4595. See for a comprehensive review: Grieco, P. A. Aldrichim. Acta 1991, 24, 159.
22. Grieco, P. A.; Nunes, J. J.; Gaul, M. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 4595. See for a comprehensive review: Grieco, P. A. Aldrichim. Acta 1991, 24, 159.
23. Dauben, W. G.; Kessal, C. R.; Takemura, K. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 6893
24. (a) Casaschi, A.; Desimoni, G.; Faita, G.; Ivernizzi, A. G.; Lanati, S.; Righetti, P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 8002 and references from the same school.
25. (b) Pagni, R. M.; Kabalka, G. W.; Bains, S.; Plesco, M.; Wilson, J.; Bartmess, J. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 3130.
26. (c) Saraswathy, V. G.; Sankararaman, S. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 4665.
27. (a) Kumar, A. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 230.
28. (b) J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 4612.
29. Kumar, A. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 1996, 9, 287
30. (a) Berson, J. A., Hamlet, Z, Mueller, W. A., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962, 84, 297
31. (b) Cativiela, C.; Garcia, J. I.; Mayroral, J. A.; Avenoza, A.; Peregrina, J. M.; Roy, M. A. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 1991, 4, 48.
32. (a) Several versions of UNIFAC are available and have been modified according to the requirements. For a summary see:
33. (b) Kumar, A. Sep. Sci. Technol. 1993, 28, 1799. In the present case, a calculation procedure described in
34. (c) Kikic, I.; Fermegha, M.; Rasmussen, P. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1991, 46, 2775 was followed. In this method, a modified Debye-Huckel term (for ions) is added with a concentration-independent UNIFAC term. This term accounts for the interactions between ions and solvent.
35. (d) For computation see: Hirata, M.; Ohe, S.; Nagayama, K. Computer Aided Data Book of Vapor Liquid Equilibria; Kodansha Ltd., Elsevier Science Publishing Co.: Tokyo, 1975.
36. (e) for extensive tabulations see: Models for Thermodynamic and Phase Equilibrium Calculations; Sandler, S. I., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1993; Chapter 4.
37. (f) There is a continuous addition of UNIFAC parameters in Data Bank.
38. A few experiments were conducted to determine the solubilities of MA in the salt solutions. In the case of MA, optical densities of a solution saturated with MA in both pure water and salt solutions were measured with a Lambda 15 UV spectrophotometer (Perkin-Elmer) at 196 nm. See: Closson, W. D.; Brady, S. F.; Orenski, P. J. J. Org. Chem. 1965, 30, 4026. The changes in the ionic concentrations produced negligible changes in the absorptivity of MA.
39. Debye, P.; McAulay, J. Phys. Z. 1925, 26, 22.
40. (a) Reiss, H.; Frisch, H. L.; Lebowitz, J. L. J. Chem. Phys. 1959, 31, 369.
41. (b) Reiss, H. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 4736. Also see:
42. (c) Masterton, W. L.; Lee, T. P. J. Phys. Chem. 1970, 74, 1776.
43. (d) Pierotti, R. A. Chem. Rev. 1976, 76, 717 and references cited therein.
44. (e) For application to mixture containing components of varied sizes see: Kumar, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9243.
45. Though UNIFAC can be used to calculate the solubilities, we have employed the scaled particle theory as it differentiates the solution phenomena into cavity formation and solvation effects. These effects play significant roles in the salting-out and -in phenomena.
46. Shoor, S. K.; Gubbins, K. E. J. Phys. Chem. 1969, 73, 498.
47. Marcus, Y. Ion Solvation; Wiley: New York, 1986.
48. Horvath, A. L. Handbook of Aqueous Electrolyte Solutions; John Wiley: Chichester, 1985.
49. The role of other solution properties in this connection is not disregarded. The role of surface tension is also pointed out in ref Id.
50. (a) Breslow, R.; Guo, T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1990, 87, 167.
51. (b) Breslow, R.; Halfon, S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1982, 89, 6916.
52. Sen, U. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 2531.
53. water. Examination of "relative" as followed by us is justified, as we intend to observe the changes in the ratios with respect to the concentrations of SSRM.
54. (a) Hildebrand, J. H.; Scott, R. L. Regular Solution Theory; Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1962.
55. T is called the internal pressure of a liquid. According to Hildebrand and Scott, the definition of internal pressure for a nonpolar liquid can be transformed into that for a polar liquid by a specific factor, indicating the polarity of a solvent.
56. (c) For a detailed definition of internal pressure see: Dack, M. R. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1975, 4, 211.
57. (d) Some authors have expressed their doubt about the role of the internal pressure of water due to hydrogen-bonding; see: ref 1d.
58. Ouette, R. J.; Williams, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 466.
59. For details see: Kumar, A. Biochemistry 1995, 34, 12921.
60. (a) Van Aldik, R.; Asono, T.; Le Noble, W. J. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 549. For the latest review see: Drljaca, A.; Hubbard, C. D.; Van Aldik, R.; Asono, T.; Basilevsk, M. V.; LeNoble, W. J. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 2167.
61. (a) Van Aldik, R.; Asono, T.; Le Noble, W. J. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 549. For the latest review see: Drljaca, A.; Hubbard, C. D.; Van Aldik, R.; Asono, T.; Basilevsk, M. V.; LeNoble, W. J. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 2167.
62. Nakagawa, K.; Ishii, Y.; Ogawa, M. Tetrahedron 1976, 32, 1427.