Diagnoses of hybrid hummingbirds (Aves: Trochilidae). 8. A provisional hypothesis for the hybrid origin of Zodalia glycerin (Gould, 1858)

Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington

Volumn 112, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 491-502

  Graves, Gary R ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PALEOBIOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHALCOSTIGMA HERRANI; COLOMBIA; COLORATION; FEATHER; HYBRID; KERATIN; LESBIA VICTORIAE; MELANIN; PERU; POPULATION GENETICS; WAVELENGTH; ZODALIA GLYCERIA;

BIRD; HYBRID; IDENTIFICATION METHOD;

EID: 0033578526     PISSN: 0006324X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Banks, R. C., & N. K. Johnson. 1961. A review of North American hybrid hummingbirdsCondor 63:3-28.
2. Bleiweiss, R., J. A. W. Kirsch, & J. C. Matheus. 1997. DNA hybridization evidence for the principal lineages of hummingbirds (Aves: Trochilidae)Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 325-343.
3. Boucard, A. 1893. Genera of humming birds. Part 2. Published by the author, London.
4. Cabanis, J., & F. Heine. 1860. Museum Heineanum. Part 3. Halberstadt, R. Frantz, 220 pp.
5. Chapman, F. M. 1917. The distribution of bird-life in Colombia; a contribution to a biological survey of South AmericaBulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 36:1-736.
6. Collar, N. J., L. P. Gonzaga, N. Krabbe, A. Madrono Nieto, L. G. Naranjo, T. A. Parker, III, & D. C. Wege. 1992. Threatened birds of the Americas: the ICBP/IUCN Red Data Book, 3rd edition, part 2. International Council for Bird Preservation, Cambridge, U.K., 1150 pp.
7. Cory, C. B. 1918. Catalogue of birds of the Americas, part 2, No. 1Field Museum of Natural History Zoological Series 13:1-315.
8. Elliot, D. G. 1878. A classification and synopsis of the Trochilidae. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, No. 317.
9. Fjeldsâ, J., & N. Krabbe. 1990. Birds of the high Andes. Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, 876 pp.
10. Goldsmith, T. H., & K. M. Goldsmith. 1979. Discrimination of colors by the black-chinned hummingbird, Archilochus alexandriJournal of Comparative Physiology A 130:209-220.
11. Gould, J. 1858. A monograph of the Trochilidae, part 3. Text opposite plate 176. Published by the author. London, unpaginated.
12. Graves, G. R. 1990. Systematics of the "green-throated sunangels" (Aves: Trochilidae): valid taxa or hybrids?-Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 103:6-25.
13. _. 1993. Relic of a lost %vorld: a new species of sunangel (Trochilidae: Heliangelus) from "Bogota."-Auk 110:1-8.
14. _. 1997. Diagnoses of hybrid hummingbirds (Aves: Trochilidae). 3. Parentage of Lesbia or-torn LawrenceProceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 110:314-319.
15. _. 1998a. Diagnoses of hybrid hummingbirds (Aves: Trochilidae). 5. Probable hybrid origin of Amazilia disions Wetmore & PhelpsProceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 111:28-34.
16. _. 1998b. Diagnoses of hybrid hummingbirds (Aves: Trochilidae). 6. An intergeneric hybrid, Aglaiocercus kingi X Metalllira tyrianthina, from VenezuelaProceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 111:511-520.
17. _, & R. L. Zusi. 1990. An intergeneric hybrid hummingbird (Heliodoxa leadbeateri X Heliangelus amclhysticollis) from northern ColombiaCondor 92:754-760.
18. Greenway, J. C., Jr. 1978. Type specimens of birds in the American Museum of Natural History. Part 2Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 161:1-305.
19. Hilty, S. L., & W. L. Brown. 1986. A guide to the birds of Colombia. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 836 pp.
20. Hunter, R. S., & R. W. Harold. 1987. The measurement of appearance, 2nd edition. Wiley, New York, 411 pp.
21. Krabbe, N., F. Skov, J. Fjeldsâ, & I. K. Petersen. 1998. Avian diversity in the Ecuadorian Andes. DIVA Technical Report no. 4. Centre for Research on Cultural and Biological Diversity of Andean Rainforests (DIVA), Copenhagen, 143 pp.
22. Lawrence, G. N. 1869. Characters of some new South American birds, with notes on other rare or little known speciesAnnals of the Lyceum of Natural History 9:265-275.
23. Meyer de Schauensee, R. 1947. New or little-known Colombian birdsProceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 99:107126.
24. Morony, J. J., Jr., W. J. Bock, & J. Farrand, Jr. 1975. Reference list of the birds of the world. American Museum of NaturL History, New York, 207 pp.
25. Mulsant, É., & É. Verreaux. 1876. Histoire Naturelle de Oiseaux-mouches ou Colibris, constituant la famille des Trochilidés, part 3. Bureau de la Société Linnéenne, Lyon.
26. Oberholser, H. C. 1902. Catalogue of a collection of hummingbirds from Ecuador and Colombia.Proceedings of the United States National Museum 24:309-342.
27. Ortiz-Crespo, F. I. 1972. A new method to separate immature and adult hummingbirdsAuk 89: 851-857.
28. Peters, J. 1945. Check-list of birds of the world, vol. 5. Museum of Comparative Zoology. Cambridge, Massachusetts, 306 pp.
29. Salvin, O. 1892. Catalogue of the Picariae in the col-lection of the British Museum. Upupae and Trochili. Catalogue of the birds in the British Museum (London), Vol. 16:1-433.
30. Schuchmann, KL., & M. Heindl. 1997. Biogeographie, geographische Variation und Taxonomie der andinen Kolibrigattung Chalcosligma Reichenbach, 1854Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologisches Museum in Berlin (Supplementheft, Annalen für Ornitholgie) 73:131-153.
31. Sclater, P. L., and O. Salvin. 1873. Nomenciator avium neotropicalium, London, 163 pp.
32. Sharpe, R. B. 1900. A hand-list of the genera and species of birds, vol. 2. British Museum (Natural History), London, 312 pp.
33. Sibley, C. G., & B. L. Monroe, Jr. 1990. Distribution and taxonomy of birds of the world. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, 1111 p.
34. Simon, E. 1921. Histoire naturelle des Trochilidae (synopsis et catalogue). Encyclopedia Roret, L. Mulo, Paris.
35. Wilkinson, L. 1989. SYSTAT: the system for statistics. SYSTAT, Inc., Evanston, Illinois, 822 pp.
36. Zusi, R. L., & G. D. Bentz. 1982. Variation of a muscle in hummingbirds and swifts and its systematic implicationsProceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 95:412-420.