Stomatopod sniffing: The scaling of chemosensory sensillae and flicking behavior with body size

Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology

Volumn 241, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 235-261

  Mead, K S ^a   Koehl, M A R ^a   O'Donnell, M J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Department of Biological Sciences ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Aesthetasc; Antennule flicking; Boundary layer; Chemosensory; Hydrodynamic; Reynolds number; Stomatopod

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANTENNA; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CRUSTACEA; HYDRODYNAMICS; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; NONHUMAN; OLFACTORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; OLFACTORY SYSTEM; SENSORY RECEPTOR;

GONODACTYLUS MUTATUS;

EID: 0033578484     PISSN: 00220981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-0981(99)00087-8     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ache B.W. Chemoreception and thermoreception. Atwood H.L., Standeman D.C. The Biology of Crustacea. Vol. 3:1982;369-393 Academic Press, New York.
2. Atema J., Voigt R. Behavior and sensory biology. Factor J.R. Biology of the Lobster Homarus americanus. 1995;313-348 Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
3. Best B. Scaling and flow dynamics of crustacean antennules: What's flicking all about? Am. Zool. 35:1995;53A.
4. Caldwell R.L. Cavity occupation and defensive behaviour in the stomatopod Gonodactylus festae: evidence for chemically mediated individual recognition. Anim. Behav. 27:1979;194-201.
5. Caldwell R.L. A test of individual recognition in the stomatopod Gonodactylus festae. Anim. Behav. 33:1985;101-106.
6. Caldwell R.L. Assessment strategies in stomatopods. Bull. Mar. Sci. 41:1987;135-150.
7. Caldwell R.L., Roderick G.K., Shuster S.M. Studies of predation by Gonodactylus bredini. Ferrero E.A. Biology of Stomatopods. Collana UZI, Selected Symposia and Monographs. 1989;117-131 Mucchi Editore, Modena.
8. Cheer A.Y.L., Koehl M.A.R. Paddles and rakes: fluid flow through bristled appendages of small organisms. J. Theor. Biol. 129:1987;17-39.
9. Fuller, W.A., 1987. Measurement Error Models, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
10. Gleeson R.A. Morphological and behavioral identification of the sensory structures mediating pheromone reception reception in the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus. Biol. Bull. 163:1982;162-171.
11. Gleeson R.A., Carr W.E.S., Trapido-Rosenthal H.G. Morphological characteristics facilitating stimulus access and removal in the olfactory organ of the spiny lobster, Panulirus argus: insight from the design. Chem. Senses. 18:1993;67-75.
12. Goldman, J., Koehl, M.A.R., 1999. Fluid dynamic design of lobster olfactory organs: high-speed kinematic analysis of antennule flicking by Panulirus argus. Chem. Senses submitted for publication.
13. Grünert U., Ache B.W. Ultrastructure of the aesthetasc (olfactory) sensilla of the spiny lobster, Panulirus argus. Cell Tissue Res. 251:1988;95-103.
14. Hallberg E., Johansson K.U.I., Elofsson R. The aesthetasc concept: structural variations of putative olfactory receptor cell complexes in Crustacea. Micros. Res. Techn. 22:1992;325-335.
15. Hansen B., Tiselius P. Flow through feeding structures of suspension feeding zooplankton: a physical model approach. J. Plankton Res. 14:1992;821-834.
16. Heimann P. Fine structure and molting of the aesthetasc sense organs on the antennules of the isopod, Asellus aquaticus (Crustacea). Cell Tissue Res. 235:1984;117-128.
17. Johnson A.S., Koehl M.A.R. Maintenance of dynamic strain similarity and environmental stress factor in different flow habitats: thallus allometry and material properties of a giant kelp. J. Exp. Biol. 195:1994;381-410.
18. Koehl M.A.R. Fluid flow through hair-bearing appendages: feeding, smelling and swimming at low and intermediate Reynolds numbers. Ellington C.P., Pedley T.J. Soc. Exp. Biol. Symp. Biological Fluid Dynamics. Vol. 49:1995;157-182.
19. Koehl M.A.R. Small-scale fluid dynamics of olfactory antennae. Mar. Fresh. Behav. Physiol. 27:1996;127-141.
20. Koehl M.A.R. When does morphology matter? Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27:1996;501-542.
21. LaBarbara M. Analyzing body size as a factor in ecology and evolution. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20:1989;97-117.
22. Louden C., Best B., Koehl M.A.R. When does motion relative to neighboring surfaces alter the flow through arrays of hairs? J. Exp. Biol. 193:1994;233-254.
23. Moore P.A., Atema J., Gerhardt G.A. Fluid dynamics and microscale chemical movement in the chemosensory appendages of the lobster, Homarus americanus. Chem. Senses. 16:1991;663-674.
24. Rubenstein D.I., Koehl M.A.R. The mechanisms of filter feeding: some theoretical considerations. Am. Nat. 111:1977;981-994.
25. Schlichting H. Boundary-Layer Theory. 7th ed. 1979;McGraw-Hill, London.
26. Schmidt B.C., Ache B.W. Olfaction: responses of a decapod crustacean are enhanced by flicking. Science. 205:1979;204-206.
27. Shimeta J., Jumars P. Physical mechanisms and rates of particle capture by suspension feeders. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev. 29:1991;191-257.
28. Slifer E.H. A rapid and sensitive method for identifying permeable areas in the body wall of insects. Ent. News. 71:1960;179-182.
29. Sokal R.R., Rohlf F.J. Biometry. 3rd ed. 1995;W.H. Freeman.
30. Vogel S. Life in Moving Fluids. 2nd ed. 1994;Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
31. Zimmer-Faust R.K. The relationship between chemoreception and foraging behavior in crustaceans. Limnol. Oceanogr. 34:1989;1364-1374.