Water and carbon fluxes above European coniferous forests modelled with artificial neural networks

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 120, Issue 2-3, 1999, Pages 181-197

  Van Wijk, M T ^a   Bouten, W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Carbon fluxes; Coniferous forests; Neural networks; Water fluxes

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CARBON FLUX; CONIFEROUS FOREST; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; WATER VAPOR;

EID: 0033578359     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00101-5     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Aubinet, M., Chermanne, B., Vandenhaute, M., Longdoz, B., Yernaux, M., Laitat, E., 1999. Long term measurements of water vapour and carbon dioxide fluxes above a mixed forest in Ardenne's region. Agric. For. Meteor. (in press).
2. Baldocchi D.D., Vogel C.A. Energy and CO2 flux densities above and below a temperate broad-leaved forest and a boreal pine forest. Tree Physiol. 16:1996;5-16.
3. Barnes B.V., Zak D.R., Denton S.R., Spurr S.H. Forest Ecology. 4th edition:1997;774 Wiley, New York.
4. Black T.A., den Hartog G., Neumann H.H., Blanken P.D., Yang P.C., Russell C., Nesic Z., Lee X., Chen S.G., Staebler R., Novak M.D. Annual cycles of water vapour and carbon dioxide fluxes in and above a boreal aspen forest. Global Change Biol. 2:1996;219-229.
5. Bosveld, F.C., Bouten, W., 1992. Comparing transpiration models with eddy-correlation observations of a Douglas fir forest. PhD-thesis W. Bouten: 163-180.
6. Bouten W., Jansson P.-E. Water balance of the Solling spruce stand as simulated with various forest-soil-atmosphere models. Ecol. Model. 83:1995;245-253.
7. Demuth, H., Beale, M., 1995. Neural Network Toolbox. For Use with Matlab. The MathWorks, Natick.
8. Falge E., Graber W., Siegwolf R., Tenhunen J.D. A model of the gas exchange response of Picea abies to habitat conditions. Trees. 10:1996;277-287.
9. Freijer, J.I., Bouten, W., Jonge, H.D., Verstraten, J.M., 1996. Assessing Mineralization Rates of Hydrocarbons in Soils in Relation to Environmental Factors. Soil Biol. Biochem.
10. Green S.R., McNaughton K.G. Modelling effective stomatal resistance for calculating transpiration from an apple tree. Agric. For. Meteorol. 83:1997;1-26.
11. Huntingford C., Cox P.M. Use of statistical and neural network techniques to detect how stomatal conductance responds to changes in the local environment. Ecol. Model. 97:1997;217-246.
12. Janssen P.H.M., Heuberger P.S.C. Calibration of process-oriented models. Ecol. Model. 83:1995;55-66.
13. Jarvis, 1976. The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. B, 273: 593-610.
14. Jarvis P.G. Scaling process and problems., Plant. cell and Environ. 18:1995;1079-1089.
15. Kimball J.S., Thornton P.E., White M.A., Running S.W. Simulating forest productivity and surface-atmosphere carbon exchange in the BOREAS study region. Tree Physiol. 17:1997;589-599.
16. Kosko B. Neural Networks and Fuzzy Systems. A Dynamical Systems Approach to Machine Intelligence. 1992;449 Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
17. Landsberg J.J., Kaufmann M.R., Binckley D., Isebrands J., Jarvis P.G. Evaluating progress toward closed forest models based on fluxes of carbon, water and nutrients. Tree Physiol. 9:1991;1-15.
18. Lee X. On micrometeorological observations of surface-air exchange over tall vegetation. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2545:1998;1-11.
19. Makkink G.F. Testing the Penman formula by means of lysimeters. J. Int. Water Eng. 11:1957;277-288.
20. Schaap M.G., Bouten W. Modelling water retention curves of sandy soils using neural networks. Water Resour. Res. 32(10):1996;3033-3040.
21. Stewart J.B. Modelling surface conductance of pine forest. Agric. For. Meteorol. 43:1988;19-35.
22. Tenhunen J.D., Valentini R., Kostner B., Zimmermann R., Granier A. Variation in forest gas exchange at landscape to continental scales. Annal. des Sci. For. 55(1-2):1998;1-11.
23. Wang Y.P., Jarvis P.G. Description and validation of an array model-MAESTRO. Agric. For. Meteorol. 51:1990;257-280.
24. Williams M., Rastetter E.B., Fernandes D.N., Goulden M.L., Shaver G.R., Johnson L.C. Predicting gross primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Appl. 7(3):1997;882-894.