Geographic extension of an uneven-aged, multi-species matrix growth model for northern hardwood forests

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 121, Issue 2-3, 1999, Pages 235-253

  Kolbe, Audra E ^a   Buongiorno, Joseph ^a   Vasievich, Michael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecological diversity; Forest ecosystems; Growth; Matrix model; Statistics

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL MODELING; FOREST; GROWTH; PRODUCTIVITY;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0033568354     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00079-4     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Boscolo M., Buongiorno J., Panayotou T. Simulating options for carbon sequestration through improved management of a lowland tropical forest. Env. Develop. Econ. 2:1997;241-263.
2. Bowling E.H., Burkhart H.E., Burk T.E., Berk D.E. A stand-level multispecies growth model for Appalachian hardwoods. Can. J. For. Res. 19:1989;405-412.
3. Bruner H.D., Moser Jr J.W. A Markov chain approach to the prediction of diameter distributions in uneven-aged forest stands. Can. J. For. Res. 3:1973;409-417.
4. Buongiorno J., Michie B.R. A matrix model of uneven-aged forest management. For. Sci. 26:1980;609-625.
5. Buongiorno J., Dahir S., Lu H.C., Lin C.R. Tree size diversity and economic returns in uneven-aged forest stands. For. Sci. 40:1994;83-103.
6. Buongiorno J., Peyron J.L., Houllier F., Bruciamacchie M. Growth and management of mixed-species, uneven-aged forests in the French Jura: Implications for economic returns and tree diversity. For. Sci. 41(3):1995;397-429.
7. Eyre, F.H. (Ed.), 1980. Forest Cover Types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC, pp. 29-32.
8. Hansen M.H., Frieswyk T., Glover J.F., Kelly J.F. The Eastwide forest inventory data base: users manual. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-151. 1992;48 USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN.
9. Houde L., Ledoux H. Modelization in natural forests: stand stability. Bois et Forêts des Tropiques. 245:1995;28-31.
10. Hunter Jr M.L. Wildlife, Forests and Forestry: Principles of Managing Forests for Biodiversity. 1990;370 Prentice Hall, NJ.
11. Kolbe, A.E., 1998. A growth model for Wisconsin's and Michigan's northern hardwoods, and management implications. M.S. Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 163 p.
12. Leak W.B., Filip S.M. Uneven-aged managemnet of northern hardwoods in New England. Research Paper NE-332. 1975;15 USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Upper Darby, PA.
13. Leatherberry E.C., Spencer Jr J.S. Michigan forest statistics, 1993. Resource Bulletin NC-183. 1996;144 USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN.
14. Lin C.R., Buongiorno J. Fixed versus variable-parameter matrix models of forest growth: the case of maple-birch forests. Ecol. Model. 99:1997;263-274.
15. Lin C.R., Buongiorno J., Vasievich M. A multi-species, density-dependent matrix growth model to predict tree diversity and income in northern hardwood stands. Ecol. Model. 91:1996;193-211.
16. Lin, C.R., Buongiorno, J., Prestemon, J., Skog, K., 1998. Growth model for uneven-aged loblolly pine stands. USDA Forest Service, research paper FPL-RP-569, p. 13.
17. Masuki, J., N. Mizoue, S. Yoshida, and M. Imada. 1998. An analysis of population dynamics of the selection forest by a matrix model-A case study of the Oketo experimental forest by the check method. p. 901-910 In: Proceedings of the FORESEA Miyasaki, 1998, Forest Sector Analysis, International Symposium on Global Concerns for Forest Resource Utilization-Sustainable Use and Management, Volume 2, A. Yoshimoto, K. Yukutake (Eds.), Miyasaki, Japan, p. 400.
18. Masuki, J., N. Mizoue, S. Yoshida, and M. Imada. 1998. An analysis of population dynamics of the selection forest by a matrix model-A case study of the Oketo experimental forest by the check method. p. 901-910 In: Proceedings of the FORESEA Miyasaki, 1998, Forest Sector Analysis, International Symposium on Global Concerns for Forest Resource Utilization-Sustainable Use and Management, Volume 2, A. Yoshimoto, K. Yukutake (Eds.), Miyasaki, Japan, p. 400.
19. Mendoza G.A., Setyarso A. A transition matrix forest growth model for evaluating alternative harvesting schemes in Indonesia. For. Ecol. Manage. 15(3):1986;219-228.
20. Mengel D.L, Roise J.P. A diameter-class matrix model for southeastern US coastal plain bottomland hardwood stands. SJAF. 14:1990;189-195.
21. Michie B.R., McCandless F.D. A matrix model of Oak-Hickory stand management and valuing forest land. For. Sci. 32(3):1986;759-768.
22. Miles, P., 1998. Personal communication from P. Miles, North Central Forest Experiment Stations, St. Paul, MN. On file at the Department of Forest Ecology and Management, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
23. Masuki, J., N. Mizoue, S. Yoshida, and M. Imada. 1998. An analysis of population dynamics of the selection forest by a matrix model-A case study of the Oketo experimental forest by the check method. p. 901-910 In: Proceedings of the FORESEA Miyasaki, 1998, Forest Sector Analysis, International Symposium on Global Concerns for Forest Resource Utilization-Sustainable Use and Management, Volume 2, A. Yoshimoto, K. Yukutake (Eds.), Miyasaki, Japan, p. 400.
24. Miller, G.W. 1991. Economic residual stand structure goals for single-tree selection in central appalachian hardwoods. pp. 821-831. In: Proceedings of the sixth biennial southern silvicultural research conference. Vol 2, S.S. Coleman, D.G. Neary (Eds.), Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, p. 868.
25. Niese J.N., Strong T.F. Economic and tree diversity trade-offs in managed northern hardwoods. Can. J. For. Res. 22:1992;1807-1813.
26. Önal H. Trade-off between structural diversity and economic objectives in forest management. Am. J. Agr. Econ. 79:1997;1001-1012.
27. Osho J.S.A. Matrix model for tree population projection in a tropical rain forest of south-western Nigeria. Ecol. Model. 59:1991;247-256.
28. Pecore M. Menominee sustained yield management: a successful land ethic in practice. J. For. 90(7):1992;12-16.
29. Pielou E.C. Mathematical Ecology. 1977;385 Wiley, Toronto.
30. Preston R.J. North American Trees. 4th Edition:1989;407 The Iowa State University Press, Iowa.
31. Pukkala T., Kolstrom T. Simulation of the development of Norway spruce stands using a transition matrix. For. Ecol. and Manage. 25:1988;255-268.
32. Rorres C. A linear programming approach to the optimum sustainable harvesting of a forest. J. Environ. Manage. 6:1978;245-254.
33. Schmidt T.L. Wisconsin forest statistics, 1996. Resource Bulletin NC-183. 1998;150 USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN.
34. Solomon D.S., Hosmer R.A., Hayslett Jr H.T. A two-stage matrix model for predicting growth of forest stands in Northeast. Can. J. For. Res. 16:1986;521-528.
35. Usher, M.B., 1966. A matrix approach to the management of renewable resources, with special references to selection forests. J. Appl. Ecol. 355-367.
36. Vanclay J.K. A growth model for north Queensland rainforests. For. Ecol. Manage. 27:1989;245-271.
37. Volin V.C., Buongiorno J. Effects of alternative management regimes on forest stand structure, species composition, and income: a model for the Italian Dolomites. For. Ecol. Manage. 87:1996;107-125.