Comparison of different models predicting the date of beginning of flowering in pea (Pisum sativum L.)

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 118, Issue 2-3, 1999, Pages 213-226

  Roche, Romain ^a   Jeuffroy, Marie Hélène ^a   Ney, Bertrand ^a  

^a INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

Author keywords

Beginning of flowering; Latitude; Model; Photoperiod; Sowing date; Temperature

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT; CROP PLANT; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; FLOWERING; PREDICTION;

PISUM SATIVUM;

EID: 0033563782     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00036-8     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Aitken Y. Flower initiation in relation to maturity in crop plants. IV Sowing time and maturity type in pea (Pisum sativum L.) in Australia. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 29:1978;983-1001.
2. Berry G.J., Aitken Y. Effect of photoperiod and temperature on flowering in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 6:1979;573-587.
3. Boote K.J., Jones J.W., Pickering N.B. Potential uses and limitations of crop models. Agron. J. 88:1996;704-716.
4. Brisson N., Delécolle R. Développement et modèles de simulation de cultures. Agronomie. 12:1991;253-263.
5. Doré T. Analyse, par voie d'enquête, de la variabilité des rendements et des effets précédents du pois protéagineux de printemps (Pisum sativum L.). 1992;214 Thèse de Doctorat, INA-PG, Paris.
6. Dumoulin V., Ney B., Etévé G. Variabilty of pea seed and plant development in pea. Crop Sci. 34:1994;992-998.
7. Erskine W., Ellis R.H., Summerfield R.J., Roberts E.H., Hussein A. Characterization of responses to temperature and photoperiod for time to flowering in a world lentil collection. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80:1990;193-199.
8. Erskine W., Hussain A., Tahir M., Bahksh A., Ellis R.H., Summerfield R.J., Roberts E.H. Field evaluation of a model of photothermal flowering responses in a world lentil collection. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88:1994;423-428.
9. Etévé G., Derieux M. Variabilité de la durée de la phase végétative chez le pois (Pisum sativum L.). Application à la sélection de types résistants à l'hiver et à la détermination de la date de semis. Agronomie. 2:1982;813-817.
10. Fernandez E.J., Lopez-Bellido L., Fuentes M., Fernandez J. LUPINMOD: A simulation model for the white lupin crop. Agric. Sys. 52:1996;57-82.
11. F.O.P., U.N.I.P., SOFIPROTEOL, 1996. Pois protéagineux, économie, réglementation, techniques de production, qualité, utilisation. PROLEA, Paris, pp. 33.
12. Gate P. Ecophysiologie du blé: de la plante à la culture. Coll. Technique et Documentation. 1995;429 Lavoisier, Paris.
13. Grebet P. Functions, subroutines and a program for easy computation of commonly required data related to the sun. Varlet-Grancher C., Bonhomme R., Sinoquet H. Crop structure and light microclimate: characterization and applications. 1993;501-511 INRA, Paris, France.
14. Hadley P., Roberts E.H., Summerfield R.J., Minchin F.R. A quantitative model of reproductive development in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp.) in relation to photoperiod and temperature, and implications for sreening germplasm. Ann. Bot. 51:1983;531-543.
15. Hadley P., Roberts E.H., Summerfield R.J., Minchin F.R. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on flowering in soyabean: a quantitative model. Ann. Bot. 53:1984;669-681.
16. Horie T., Nakagawa H., Kira T. Modeling and prediction of the developmental processes of rice: I. Dynamic model for predicting the flowering date. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 55:1986;214-215.
17. Jamieson P.D., Brooking I.R., Porter J.R., Wilson D.R. Prediction of leaf appearance in wheat: a question of temperature. Field Crops Res. 41:1995;35-44.
18. Jeuffroy M.H., Duthion C., Meynard J.M., Pigeaire A. Effect of a short period of high day temperatures during flowering on the seed number per pod of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Agronomie. 2:1990;139-145.
19. Kelly M.O., Davies P.J. Genetic and photoperiod control of the relative rates of reproductive and vegetative development in peas. Ann. Bot. 58:1986;13-21.
20. Kirby E.J.M. A field study of the number of main shoot leaves in wheat in relation to vernalization and photoperiod. J. Agric. Sci. Cambridge. 118:1991;271-278.
21. Kirby E.J.M. Factors affecting rate of leaf emergence in barley and wheat. Crop Sci. 35:1995;11-19.
22. Lambert R.G., Link A.J. Effects of high temperature on yield of peas. Plant Physiol. 33:1958;347-350.
23. Lecoeur J. Réponses phénologiques et morphologiques du pois (Pisum sativum L.) à la contrainte hydrique. Conséquences sur le nombre de phytomères reproducteurs. 1994;99 Thèse de docteur ingénieur, ENSA Montpellier, France.
24. Loss S.P., Perry M.W., Anderson W.K. Flowering times of wheats in south western australia: a modelling approach. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 41:1990;213-223.
25. Maurer A.R., Jaffray D.E., Fletcher H.F. Responses of peas to environment. III- Assesment of the morphological development of peas. Can. J. Plant Sci. 46:1966;285-290.
26. Mesplé F., Troussellier M., Casellas C., Legendre P. Evaluation of simple statistical criteria to qualify a simulation. Ecol. Model. 88:1996;9-18.
27. Meynard J.M. Construction d'itinéraires techniques pour la conduite du blé d'hiver. 1985;244 Thèse de docteur ingénieur, INA-PG, Paris, France.
28. McMaster G.S., Wilhelm W.W. Accuracy of equations predicting the phyllochron of wheat. Crop Sci. 35:1995;30-36.
29. Miglietta F. Effect of photoperiod and temperature on leaf initiation rates in wheat (Triticum spp.). Field Crops Res. 21:1989;121-130.
30. Moore T.C., Bonde E.K. Physiology of flowering in peas. Plant Physiol. 37:1962;149-153.
31. Murfet I.C. The physiological-genetics of flowering. Sutcliffe J.F., Pate J.S. The Physiology of Garden Pea. 1977;385-430 Academie Press, London.
32. Ney B., Duthion C., Fontaine E. Timing of reproductive abortions in relation to cell division, water content and growth of pea seed. Crop Sci. 33:1993;267-270.
33. Ney B., Turc O. Heat-unit-based description of the reproductive development of pea. Crop Sci. 33:1993;510-514.
34. Ney B., Duthion C., Turc O. Phenological response of pea to water stress during reproductive development. Crop Sci. 34:1994;141-146.
35. Paruelo J.M., Tomasel F. Prediction of functional characteristics of ecosystems: a comparison of artificial neural networks and regression models. Ecol. Model. 98:1996;173-186.
36. Passioura J.B. Simulation models: Science, snake oil, education, or engineering? Agron. J. 88:1996;690-694.
37. Reath A.U., Wittwer S.H. The effect of temperature and photoperiod on the development of pea varieties. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 60:1952;301-310.
38. Reid J.B. Flowering in Pisum: evidence that vernalization does not influence the length of evocation. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 8:1981;319-327.
39. Reynolds J.F., Acock B. Modularity and genericness in plant and ecosystem models. Ecol. Model. 94:1997;7-16.
40. Roberts E.H., Summerfield R.J. Measurement and prediction flowering in annual crops. Atherton J.G. Manipulation flowering. 1987;17-30 Butterworth, London.
41. Salter P.J. The effect of wet or dry soil conditions at different growth stages on the components of yield of a pea crop. J. Hort. Sci. 38:1963;321-324.
42. SAS Institute. 1987. SAS/STAT Guide of personal computers, version 6. SAS Inst. Cary, NC.
43. Schröder U., Söndgerath D. The concept of biological time for computing the switching points of a growth model for winter wheat. Ecol. Model. 88:1996;1-8.
44. Sinclair T.R., Kitani S., Hinson K., Bruniard J., Horie T. Soybean flowering date: linear and logistic models based on temperature and photoperiod. Crop Sci. 31:1991;786-790.
45. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G., 1984. Méthodes statistiques. Paris: Association de Coordination Technique Agricole.
46. Summerfield R.J., Roberts E.H., Erskine W., Ellis H. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on flowering in lentils (Lens culinaris Medic.). Ann. Bot. 56:1985;659-671.
47. Summerfield R.J., Roberts E.H. Photothermal regulation of flowering in pea, lentil, faba bean ond chickpea. Summerfield R.J. World crops: Cool season food legumes. 1988;911-922 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam.
48. Summerfield R.J., Wien H.C. Effects of photoperiod and air temperature on growth and yield of economic legumes. Summerfield R.J., Bunting A.H. Advances in legume science. 1980;17-36 Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
49. Tomassone R., Dervin C., Masson J.-P. Biométrie. Modélisation de phénomènes biologiques. 1993;553 Masson, Paris.
50. Trouslard-Kerdiles V., Grondona M.O. A case of combined use of crop simulation models and general linear models. Ecol. Model. 99:1997;71-85.
51. Truong H.H., Duthion C. Times of flowering of pea (Pisum sativum L.). as a function of leaf appearance rate and node of first flower. Ann. Bot. 72:1993;133-142.
52. Wallach D., Goffinet B. Mean squared error of prediction as a criterion for evaluating and comparing system models. Ecol. Modelling. 44:1989;299-306.
53. Weir A.H., Bragg P.L., Porter J.R., Rayner J.J. A winter crop simulation model without water on nutrients limitations. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 102:1984;371-382.
54. Whisler F.D., Acock B., Baker D.N., Fye R.E., Hodges H.F., Lambert J.R., Lemmon H.E., McKinion J.M., Reddy V.R. Crop simulation models in agronomic systems. Adv. Agron. 40:1986;141-208.
55. Wilhelm W.W., McMaster G.S. Importance of the phyllocron in studying development and growth in grasses. Crop Sci. 35:1995;1-3.
56. Wilkerson G.G., Jones J.W., Boote K.J., Mishoe J.W. SOYGRO V5.0: Soybean crop growth and yield model. Internal report. 1985;220 Gainesville University, FL.