Informed consent: Goal or means?;Geiformeerde weloverwogen toestemming ('informed consent'): Doel of middel?

Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde

Volumn 143, Issue 20, 1999, Pages 1033-1037

  Schellings, R ^a   Sturmans, F ^b,c   Kessels, A G H ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c GG and GD Rotterdam en Omstreken   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LAW; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT RIGHT; REVIEW; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; NETHERLANDS;

EPIDEMIOLOGY; ETHICS, MEDICAL; FEMALE; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; NETHERLANDS;

EID: 0033563305     PISSN: 00282162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Sturmans F, Van wederzijds belang: over nut en noodzaak van academisering van de maatschappelijke gezondheidszorg [inaugurele rede]. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam; 1998.
2. Ellenberg SS, Randomization designs in comparative clinical trials. N Engl J Med 1984;310:1404-8.
3. Bergkamp L. Het proefdier mens. De normering en regulering van medische experimenten met mensen. Alphen aan den Rijn: Samsom; 1988.
4. Beaufort ID de, Mulder JH. Informed consent en experimenten met mensen. 'Zelen revisited': informed consent en prerandomisatie. Metamedica 1987;66:454-60.
5. Smith R. Commentary: the importance of patients' consent for publication. BMJ 1996;313:16.
6. Smith R. Informed consent: edging forwards (and backwards). BMJ 1998;316:949-51.
7. Regelen inzake medisch-wetenschappelijk onderzoek met mensen (Wet Medisch-wetenschappelijk Onderzoek met Mensen). 's-Gravenhage: Sdu; 1996.
8. Wet Geneeskundige Behandelingsovereenkomst. Staatsblad 1994: 837. 's-Gravenhage: Staatsuitgeverij; 1994.
9. Faden RR, Beauchamp TL, King NMP. A history and theory of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press; 1986.
10. Trials of war criminals before the Nuremberg military tribunals under Control Council Law nr 10:181-2.unal I 1947. Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office; 1949.
11. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. JAMA 1997:277:925-6.
12. Aanscherping van de ethische criteria voor medisch-wetenschappelijke verslaglegging en de Verklaring van Helsinki. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1999;143:33-6.
13. Beecher HK, Experimentation in man. Springfield, Ill.: Thomas; 1959.
14. Beecher HK. Ethics and clinical research. N Engl J Med 1966; 274:1354-60.
15. Beecher HK. Consent in clinical experimentation: myth and reality. JAMA 1966;195:34-5.
16. Papworth MH. Human guinea pigs: experimentation on man. Boston: Beacon Press; 1967.
17. Katz J, Capran A, Swift Glass E. Experimentation with human beings. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1972.
18. Brandt AM. Racism and research: the case of the Tuskegee syphilis study. Hastings Cent Rep 1978;6:21-9.
19. Levine RJ. Ethics and regulation of clinical research. Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1981. p. 51-3.
20. Ingelfinger FJ. Ethics of experiments on children. N Engl J Med 1973;288:791-2.
21. Ward R, Krugman S, Giles JP, Jacobs AM. Bodansky O. Infectious hepatitis: studies of its natural history and prevention. N Engl J Med 1958;258:407-16.
22. APA Committee on Ethical Standards for Psychology. Ethical standards for psychology. Am Psychol 1951;6:427-52.
23. Ruebhausen OM, Brim Jr OG. Privacy and behavioral research. Am Psychol 1966;21:423-37.
24. American Psychological Association (APA). Ethical principles in the conduct of research with human participants. Washington: APA; 1973.
25. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Making health care decisions: the ethical and legal implementations of informed consent in the patient-practitioner relationship. Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office; 1982.
26. Doyal L. Informed consent - a response to recent correspondence. BMJ 1998;316:1000-1.
27. Have H ten. De ethiek van de onderzoeksopzet: gerandomiseerde heroïneverstrekking. Tijdschr Soc Gezondheidszorg 1996;74:374-5.
28. Baum M. New approach for recruitment into randomised controlled trials. Lancet 1993;341:812-3.
29. Wet Persoonsregistraties. Staatsblad 1988;665. 's-Gravenhage: Staatsuitgeverij; 1989.
30. Vandenbroucke JP, Grobbee DE. Lessen uit een kunsthartklep-controverse. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1998;142:1648-52.
31. Bouter LM, Dongen MCJM van. Epidemiologisch onderzoek: opzet en interprctatie. Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum; 1995.
32. Zelen MA. A new design for randomized clinical trials. N Engl J Med 1979;300:1242-5.
33. Beraadsgroep 'Gezondheidsethiek en Gezondheidsrecht'. Privacy bij postmarketing surveillance. Den Haag: Gezondheidsraad; 1993. P. 27-9.
34. Callahan D. Autonomy: a moral good, not a moral obsession. Hastings Center Report 1984;11:40-2.
35. Warnock M. Informed consent - a publisher's duty. BMJ 1998; 316:1002-3.