Preattentive control of serial auditory processing in dichotic listening

Brain and Language

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 358-376

  Yund, E William ^a,b   Uno, Akira ^a,b   Woods, David L ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry   (Japan)

Author keywords

Auditory; CVs; Hemispheric specialization; Reaction time; Selective attention; Speech

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; DICHOTIC LISTENING; DIRECTIONAL HEARING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; VOICE;

EID: 0033557066     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/brln.1998.2034     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aaltonen O., Eerola O., Hellström Å., Vusipaikka E., Lang A. H. Perceptual magnet effect in the light of behavioral and psychophysiological data. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 101:1997;1090-1105.
2. Asbjornsen A. E., Hugdahl K. Attentional effects in dichotic listening. Brain and Language. 49:1995;189-201.
3. Bloch M. I., Hellige J. B. Stimulus intensity, attentional instructions, and the ear advantage during dichotic listening. Brain and Cognition. 9:1989;136-148.
4. Bookbinder J., Osman E. Attentional strategies in dichotic listening. Memory and Cognition. 7:1979;511-520.
5. Bryden M. P. Binaural competition and division of attention as determinants of the laterality effect in dichotic listening. Canadian Journal of Psychology. 23:1969;101-113.
6. Bryden M. P., Munhall K., Allard F. Attentional biases and the right-ear effect in dichotic listening. Brain and Language. 18:1983;236-248.
7. Catlin J., Neville H. The laterality effect in reaction time to speech stimuli. Neuropsychologia. 14:1976;141-143.
8. Catlin J., VanDerveer N. J., Teicher R. D. Monaural right-ear advantage in a target-identification task. Brain and Language. 3:1976;470-481.
9. Cutting J. E. Two left-hemisphere mechanisms in speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics. 16:1974;601-612.
10. Darwin C. J., Baddeley A. D. Acoustic memory and the perception of speech. Cognitive Psychology. 6:1974;41-60.
11. Efron R. The decline and fall of hemispheric specialization. 1990;Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
12. Efron R., Bogen J. E., Yund E. W. Perception of dichotic chords by normal and commissurotomized human subjects. Cortex. 13:1977;137-149.
13. Efron R., Yund E. W. Spatial nonuniformities in visual search. Brain and Cognition. 31:1996;331-368.
14. Geffen G. Development of hemispheric specialization for speech perception. Cortex. 12:1976;337-346.
15. Geffen G. The effects of orientation and maintenance of attention on hemispheric asymmetry for speech perception. Cortex. 24:1988;255-265.
16. Henry R. G. Monaural studies eliciting an hemispheric asymmetry: A bibliography. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 48:1979;335-338.
17. Hiscock M., Hampson E., Wong S. C., Kinsbourne M. Effects of eye movements on the recognition and localization of dichotic stimuli. Brain and Cognition. 4:1985;140-155.
18. Kallman H. J. Ear asymmetries with monaurally-presented sounds. Neuropsychologia. 15:1977;833-835.
19. Katsuki J., Speaks C. E., Penner S., Bilger R. C. Application of theory of signal detection to dichotic listening. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 27:1984;444-448.
20. Kimura D. Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Canadian Journal of Psychology. 15:1961;166-171.
21. Kimura D. The asymmetry of the human brain. Scientific American. 228:1973;70-78.
22. Kimura D., Folb S. Neural processing of backwards-speech sounds. Science. 161:1968;395-396.
23. Kinsbourne M. The mechanism of hemispheric control of the lateral gradient of attention. Attention and performance V. 1975;Academic Press, New York. p. 81-97.
24. Kuhl P. K. Infant speech perception: A window on psycholinguistic development. International Journal of Psycholinguistics. 9:1993;33-56.
25. Kuhl P. K. Learning and representation in speech and language. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 4:1994;812-822.
26. Näätänen R., Lehtokoski A., Lennes M., Cheour M., Huotilainen M., Iivonen A., Vainio M., Alku P., Ilmoniemi R. J., Luuk A., Allik J., Sinkkonen J., Alho K. Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature. 385:1997;432-434.
27. Oldfield R. C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinborough inventory. Neuropsychologia. 9:1971;97-113.
28. Rastatter M. P., Gallaher A. J. Reaction-times of normal subjects to monaurally presented verbal and tonal stimuli. Neuropsychologia. 20:1982;465-473.
29. Repp B. H. Stimulus dominance and ear dominance in the perception of dichotic voicing contrasts. Brain and Language. 5:1978;310-330.
30. Sparks R., Geschwind N. Dichotic listening in man after section of neocortical commissures. Cortex. 4:1968;3-16.
31. Speaks C., Niccum N., Carney E. Statistical properties of responses to dichotic listening with CV nonsense syllables. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 72:1982;1185-1194.
32. Springer S. P. Ear asymmetry in a dichotic detection task. Perception and Psychophysics. 10:1971;239-241.
33. Springer S. P. Hemispheric specialization for speech opposed by contralateral noise. Perception and Psychophysics. 13:1973;391-393.
34. Springer S. P., Sidtis J. J., Wilson D., Gazzaniga M. S. Left ear performance in dichotic listening following commissurotomy. Neuropsychologia. 16:1978;305-312.
35. Tartter V. C., Blumstein S. E. The effects of pitch and spectral differences on phonetic fusion in dichotic listening. Journal of Phonetics. 9:1981;251-259.
36. Wolfe J. M. Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 1:1994;202-238.
37. Wolfe J. M. Extending "guided search": Why "guided search" needs a preattentive "item map." Kramer A. F., Coles M. G. H., Logan G. D. Converging operations in the study of visual attention. 1996;247-270 American Psychological Association, Washington.
38. Wolfe J. M., Cave K. R., Franzel S. L. Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 15:1989;419-433.
39. Yund E. W. Amplification of spatial nonuniformities by guided search mechanisms. Christman S. Cerebral asymmetries in sensory and perceptual processing. 1997;161-195 Elsevier Science B.V. New York.