Barriers to referral in patients with angina: Qualitative study

British Medical Journal

Volumn 319, Issue 7207, 1999, Pages 418-421

  Gardner, Katy ^a,b   Chappie, Alison ^a,b   Chapple, Alison ^a,b  

^a Princes Park Health Centre   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGINA PECTORIS; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; GENERAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVASCULARIZATION; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; AGED; ANGINA PECTORIS; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CULTURE; FAMILY PRACTICE; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION;

EID: 0033554151     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Forrest D. Heart disease fneinition and managcinnit in LnvrpooL Liverpool: Liverpool Health Auiliorit), 1993.
2. Kce F. Referrals for coronary angiography in a high risk, population. Qual Health Care 1993;2:S7-90.
3. Bcn-Shlomo V, Chaturvedi N. Assessing equity m access to health care provision in the UK: does where you live affect your chances of getting a coronary artery bypass graft? J Epidemiol Community Health 1993;49:200-4.
4. Black N. Langham S, Petticrew M. Coronary revascuhrisation: why do rates vary geographically in the UK? J Epidemiol Community Health 1993;-49:-408-12.
5. Payne N, Saul C. Variations in use of cardiology services in a health authority: comparison of coronary artery revascularisation rates with prevalence of angina and coronary mortality. BMJ 1997;314:257-61.
6. Shaukat X, de Bono DP, Cruickshank JK. Clinical features, risk factors, and referral delay in British patients of Indian and European origin with angina matched for age and extent of coronary athcroma. BMJ 1993;307:717-8.
7. Lear JT, Lawrence IG, Burden AC, Pohl JE. A comparison of stress test referral rates and outcome between Asians and Europeans, y R Soc Mcd 1994;84:GGl-2.
8. Petticrew M, McKee M,Jones J. Coronary arter)- surgery: are women discriminated against? BMJ 1993;30G:11G4-6.
9. Beery TA. Gender bias in die diagnosis and treatment of coronary artery disease. Hrar Lung 1995;24:427-35.
10. Green X, Britten X. Qualitative research and evidence based medicine. &U 199S216:1230-2.
11. Hoddinott P, Pill R. Qualitative research interviewing by doctors. A personal view of the opportunities and pitfalls. Fam Pract 1997; 14:307-12
12. Tesch IL Analysts types and soßu-are tools. Basingstoke: Falmcr, 1990.
13. Morse JM. 'Perfectly healthy but dead': die mydi of inter-rater reliability. Quat Health Res 1997;7:445-7.
14. PopayJ, Williams G. Public health research and lay knowledge. Soc Sri Med 1996;4 2:759-68.
15. Morse JM. Qualitate general izability. Qual Health Res 1999;9:5-6.
16. Pendleton D, SchofieldT.Tate P.Havelock R Thf consultation: an approach to learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.
17. Rusion A, Clayton J, Calnan M. Patients' actions during their cardiac event: qualitative study exploring differences and modifiable factors. BMJ 1998;316:106O-4.
18. Chappie A, Gatrell A. Variations in use of cardiac services in England: perceptions of general practitioners, general physicians and cardiologists. J Health Sen Rrs IWcy 1998;3:153-8.
19. Anderson RM. Revisiting die behavioural model and access to medical care: does it mattery? Health Soclkhm 1999;36:l-10.