A new method for risk analysis of vaccines [2]

Vaccine

Volumn 17, Issue 19, 1999, Pages 2335-

  Poirriez, J ^a,b  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER   (France)

^b CIMOT 8 R du Ft Louis 59140   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DRUG; VACCINE;

ADVERSE DRUG REACTION; INJECTION; LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0033553626     PISSN: 0264410X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0264-410X(99)00033-X     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Farrington P., Pugh S., Colville A., Flower A., Nash J., Morgan-Capner P., Rush M., Miller E. A new method for active surveillance of adverse events from diphteria/tetanus/pertussis and measles/mumps/rubella vaccines. Lancet. 345:1995;567-569.
2. Rey M. Vaccinations. 1980;42-43 Masson, Paris.
3. Stratton K.R., Howe C.J., Johnston R.B. Adverse events associated with childhood vaccines. Evidence bearing on causality. 1994;National Academy Press, Washington.
4. Bégaud B., Evreux J.C., Jouglard J., Lagier G. Unexpected or toxic drug reaction assessment (imputation). Actualization of the method used in France. Therapie. 40:1985;115-118.
5. Chen R.T., De Stefano F. Vaccine adverse events: causal or coincidental? Lancet. 351:1998;611-612.