Population levels and flight phenology of bark beetle predators in stands with and without previous infestations of the bark beetle Tomicus piniperda

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 123, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 31-40

  Schroeder, L M ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Predator prey ratios; Rhizophagus depressus; Stand level; Thanasimus formicarius; Tomicus piniperda

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; FLIGHT ACTIVITY; POPULATION SIZE; PREDATOR;

SWEDEN;

ANIMALIA; CLERIDAE; COLEOPTERA; FORMICARIUS; GLISCHROCHILUS; NITIDULIDAE; PINUS SYLVESTRIS; RHIZOPHAGUS; RHIZOPHAGUS DEPRESSUS; SCOLYTINAE; THANASIMUS; THANASIMUS FORMICARIUS; TOMICUS PINIPERDA;

EID: 0033547232     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00014-6     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Bakke A. Ecological studies on bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) associated with Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in Norway with particular reference to the influence of temperature. Medd. Nor. Skogsforsoeksves. 21:1968;443-602.
2. Bakke A., Kvamme T. Kairomone response in Thanasimus predators to pheromone components of Ips typographus. J. Chem. Ecol. 7:1981;305-312.
3. Berrymann, A.A., Ferrell, G.T., 1988. The fir engraver beetle in western states. In: Berrymann, A.A. (Ed.), Dynamics of forest insect populations: patterns, causes, and implications, Plenum, New York, pp. 556-576.
4. Billings, R.F., 1988. Forecasting southern pine beetle infestation trends with pheromone traps. In: Payne, T.L., Saarenmaa, H. (Eds.), Integrated control of bark beetles, Proceedings of the IUFRO working party in Vancouver Canada 1988, pp. 295-306.
5. Byers J.A., Lanne B.S., Löfqvist J., Schlyter F., Bergström G. Olfactory recognition of host-tree susceptibility by pine shoot beetles. Naturwissenschaften. 72:1985;324-326.
6. Cole W.E. Some risks and causes of mortality in mountain pine beetle populations: a long term analysis. Res. Popul. Ecol. 23:1981;116-144.
7. Dahlsten, D.L., 1982. Relationships between bark beetles and their natural enemies. In: Mitton, J.B., Sturgeon, K.B. (Eds.), Bark beetles in North American conifers, University of Texas press, Austin, pp. 140-182.
8. Ehnström B., Långström B., Hellqvist C. Insects in burned forests - forest protection and faunal conservation (preliminary results). Entomol. Fennica. 5:1995;109-117.
9. Eidmann H.H. Untersuchungen über die Verteilung und den Verlauf von Insektenbefall an berindetem Kiefern- und Fichtenholz. Skogshögskolan, Institutionen för Skogsentomologi, Rapporter och Uppsatser. 3:1965;1-59.
10. Eidmann H.H. Versuche über den Verlauf des Schwärmens von Borkenkäfern und des Insektenbefalls an Kiefernholz in Mittelschweden. Stud. For. Suec. 113:1974;1-26.
11. Forsse E., Solbreck C. Migration in the bark beetle Ips typographus L.: duration, timing and height of flight. Z. ang. Ent. 100:1985;47-57.
12. Forsslund, K.E., 1941. Till kännedom om myrbaggens (Clerus formicarius) biologi. Sveriges Skogsvårdsförenings Tidskrift 7, pp. 95-98 (in Swedish).
13. Gauss, R., 1954. Der Ameisenbuntkäfer Thanasimus (Clerus) formicarius Latr. als Borkenkäferfeind. In: Wellenstein, G. (Ed.), Die grosse Borkenkäferkalamität in Südwestdeutschland 1944-1951, Forstschutzstelle Südwest/Ringingen, pp. 417-429.
14. Heidger, C.M., 1994. Die Ökologie und Bionomie der Borkenkäfer-Antagonisten Thanasimus Formicarius L. (Cleridae) und Scoloposcelis pulchella Zett. (Antocoridae). Inaugural-Dissertation dem Fachbereich Biologie der Philipps-Universität Marburg.
15. Herard F., Mercadier G. Natural enemies of Tomicus piniperda and Ips acuminatus (Col.: Scolytidae) on Pinus sylvestris near Orléans, France: temporal occurrence and relative abundance, and notes on eight predatory species. Entomophaga. 41:1996;18-46.
16. Hui Y., Bakke A. Development and reproduction of Thanasimus formicarius (L.) (Coleoptera: Cleridae) at three constant temperatures. Can. Ent. 129:1997;579-583.
17. Inouye, M., 1963. Details of bark beetle control in the storm-swept areas in the natural forest of Hokkaido, Japan. Z. ang. Ent. 51, 160-164.
18. Jones D. Use, misuse, and role of multiple-comparison procedures in ecological and agricultural entomology. Environ. Entomol. 13:1984;635-649.
19. Lanne B.S., Schlyter F., Byers J.A., Löfqvist J., Leufven A., Bergström G., Van Der Pers J.N.C., Unelius R., Baeckström P., Norin T. Differences in attraction to semiochemicals present in the sympatric pine shoot beetles, Tomicus minor and T. piniperda. J. Chem. Ecol. 13:1987;1045-1067.
20. Lekander, B., 1972. A massoutbreak of Ips typographus in Gästrikland, Central Sweden, in 1945-1952. Research note 10, Dept of Forest Zoology, Royal College of Forestry, Stockholm, pp. 1-39 (in Swedish with English summary).
21. Linit M.J., Stephen F.M. Parasite and predator component of within-tree southern pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) mortality. Can. Ent. 115:1983;679-688.
22. Långström B. Life cycles and shoot-feeding of the pine shoot beetles. Stud. Forestal. Suecica. 163:1983;1-29.
23. McCambridge W.F., Knight F.B. Factors affecting spruce beetles during a small outbreak. Ecology. 53:1972;830-839.
24. Miller M.C. Survival of within-tree Ips calligraphus (Col.: Scolytidae): effect of insect associates. Entomophaga. 31:1986;39-48.
25. Mjöberg, E., 1906. Om några svenska insekters biologi och utveckling. Arkiv för Zoologi 3, pp. 1-22 (in Swedish with German summary).
26. Nicolai V. The impact of Medetera dendrobaena Kowarz (Dipt. Dolichopodidae) on bark beetles. J. Appl. Ent. 119:1995;161-166.
27. Nilssen A.C. Long-range aerial dispersal of bark beetles and bark weevils (Coleoptera, Scolytidae and Curculionidae) in northern Finland. Ann. Ent. Fenn. 50:1984;37-42.
28. Nuorteva M. Über den Fichtenstamm-Bastkäfer, Hylurgops palliatus Gyll., und seine Insektenfeinde. Acta Ent. Fenn. 13:1956;1-118.
29. Reeve J.D. Predation and bark beetle dynamics. Oecologia. 112:1997;48-54.
30. Saalas, U., 1917. Die Fichtenkäfer Finnlands I. Allgemeiner Teil und spezieller Teil 1. Annales Academiae Scientiarium Fennicae, Ser. A., Tom. 8, Helsinki, 1-547.
31. Saalas, U., 1923. Die Fichtenkäfer Finnlands II. Spezieller Teil 2 und Larvenbestimmungstabelle. Annales Academiae Scientiarium Fennicae, Ser. A., Tom. 22, Helsinki, 1-746.
32. Schroeder L.M. Attraction of the bark beetle Tomicus piniperda to Scots pine trees in relation to tree vigor and attack density. Entomol. exp. appl. 44:1987;53-58.
33. Schroeder L.M. Attraction of the bark beetle Tomicus piniperda and some other bark- and wood-living beetles to the host volatiles α-pinene and ethanol. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 46:1988;203-210.
34. Schroeder L.M. Establishment of a new brood in Tomicus piniperda (L.) (Col.: Scolytidae) after a second hibernation. J. Appl. Ent. 108:1989;27-34.
35. Schroeder L.M. Attraction of Epuraea bickhardti St.-Claire Deville and E. boreella (Zetterstedt) (Coleoptera Nitidulidae) to ethanol and α-pinene. Entomol. Fennica. 4:1993;133-135.
36. Schroeder L.M. Interactions between the predators Thanasimus formicarius (Col.: Cleridae) and Rhizophagus depressus (Col.: Rhizophagidae), and the bark beetle Tomicus piniperda (Col.: Scolytidae). Entomophaga. 41:1996;63-75.
37. Schroeder L.M., Lindelöw Å. Attraction of scolytids and associated beetles by different absolute amounts and proportions of α-pinene and ethanol. J. Chem. Ecol. 15:1989;807-817.
38. Schroeder L.M., Eidmann H.H. Attacks of bark- and wood-boring Coleoptera on snow-broken conifers over a two-year period. Scand. J. For. Res. 8:1993;257-265.
39. Schroeder, L.M., Weslien, J., 1994a. Reduced offspring production in bark beetle Tomicus piniperda in pine bolts baited with ethanol and α-pinene, which attract antagonistic insects. J. Chem. Ecol. 20, 1429-1444.
40. Schroeder, L.M., Weslien, J., 1994b. Interactions between the phloem-feeding species Tomicus piniperda (Col.: Scolytidae) and Acanthocinus aedilis (Col.: Cerambycidae), and the predator Thanasimus formicarius (Col.: Cleridae) with special reference to brood production. Entomophaga 39, 149-157.
41. Spessivtseff P. Beitrag zur Biologie von Hylurgops palliatus Gyll. Ent. Tidskr. 59:1938;159-162.
42. Stephen, F.M., Berisford, C.W., Dahlsten, D.L., Fenn, P., Moser, J.C., 1993. Invertebrate and microbial associates. In: Schowalter, T.D., Filip, G.M. (Eds.), Beetle-pathogen interactions in conifer forests. Academic Press, London, pp. 129-153.
43. Szujecki, A., 1987. Ecology of forest insects. Dr. W. Junk Publishers.
44. Turchin P., Lorio P.L., Taylor A.D., Billings R.F. Why do populations of southern pine beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) fluctuate? Environ. Entomol. 20:1991;401-409.
45. Weslien J. The arthropod complex associated with Ips typographus (L.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): Species composition, phenology, and impact on bark beetle productivity. Entomol. Fennica. 3:1992;205-213.
46. Weslien J. Interactions within and between species at different densities of the bark beetle Ips typographus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and its predator Thanasimus formicarius (Coleoptera Cleridae). Entomol. exp. appl. 71:1994;133-143.
47. Weslien J., Lindelöw Å. Trapping a local population of spruce bark beetles Ips typographus (L.): population size and origin of trapped beetles. Holarct. Ecol. 12:1989;511-514.
48. Weslien J., Regnander J. The influence of natural enemies on brood production in Ips typographus (Col.: Scolytidae) with special reference to egg-laying and predation by Thanasimus formicarius (Col.: Cleridae). Entomophaga. 37:1992;333-342.
49. Weslien J., Schröter H. Naturliche Dynamik des Borkenkäferbefalls nach Windwurf. AFZ. 19:1996;1052-1056.
50. Weslien, J., Schroeder, L.M., 1999. Population levels of bark beetles and associated insects in managed and unmanaged spruce stands. For. Ecol. Management, in press.