Crossflow microfiltration of magnesium hydroxide suspensions: Determination of critical fluxes, measurement and modelling of fouling

Separation and Purification Technology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 25-45

  Fradin, Benoît ^a   Field, R W ^a  

^a University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Constant flux; Critical flux; Microfiltration; Shear stress

Indexed keywords

FOULING; FRICTION; MAGNESIUM COMPOUNDS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY; MICROFILTRATION; NON NEWTONIAN LIQUIDS; PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS; RHEOLOGY; SHEAR STRESS; TURBULENT FLOW;

CONSTANT FLUX; CRITICAL FLUX; FILTER CAKE; FRICTION FORCE MODEL; MAGNESIUM HYDROXIDE; SHEAR STRESS MODEL; ZETA POTENTIAL;

SUSPENSIONS (FLUIDS);

FOULING; MICROFILTRATION; SHEAR STRESS; SUSPENSION;

EID: 0033542349     PISSN: 13835866     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1383-5866(98)00098-7     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Blake N.J., Cumming I.W., Streat M. Prediction of steady state crossflow filtration using a force balance model. J. Membrane Sci. 68:1992;205-216.
2. van Reis R., Leonard L.C., Hsu C.C., Builder S.E. Industrial scale harvest of proteins from mammalian cell culture by tangential flow filtration. Biotechnol. Bioengng. 38:1991;413-422.
3. Zydney A.L., Colton C.K. A concentration polarisation model for the filtration flux in crossflow microfiltration of particulate suspension. Chem. Engng Comm. 47:1986;1-21.
4. G. Green, G. Belfort, Fouling of ultrafiltration membrane: lateral migration and particulate trajectory model, Desalination (1980) 35.
5. Fane A.G., Fell C.J.D., Nor M.T. Ultrafiltration in the presence of suspended matter. Ind. Chem. Eng. Jubilee Symp. 73:1982;C1-12.
6. R.G. Holdich, I.W. Cumming, B. Ismail, The variation of cross-flow filtration rate with wall shear stress and the effect of deposit thickness, Trans IChemE (1995) 73.
7. P. De Bank, Contribution à l'étude de la concentration de boues résiduaires nucléaires. Microfiltration tangentielle sur membranes minérales des suspensions d'hydroxydes ferriques en milieu fortement salin, thèse de l'Université d'Aix-Marseille, France, 1990.
8. M.C. Aubert, Contrainte critique d'érosion d'un dépot superficiel de matière sur membrane de microfiltration, thèse de l'UTC, Compiègne, France, 1995.
9. Field R.W., Wu D., Howell J.A., Gupta B.B. Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling. J. Membrane Sci. 100:1995;259-272.
10. Boyaval P., Lavenant C., Gésan G., Daufin G. Transient and stationary operating conditions on performance of lactic acid bacteria crossflow microfiltration. Biotechnol. Bioengng. 49:1996;78-86.
11. Dodge D.W., Metzner A.B. Turbulent flow of non-Newtonian systems. AIChE J. 5(2):1959;189-204.
12. Coulson J.M., Richardson J.F., 1990. Chemical Engineering, vol. 1, Pergamaon Press, Oxford.
13. V. Nassehi, R.G. Holdich, I.W. Cumming, Comparison of experimental and numerical rheological data of non-Newtonian suspensions, Trans. IChemE. (1993) Part A 71.
14. Davis R.H. Modelling of fouling of crossflow microfiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Meth. 21:1993;2.
15. Bear J., 1975. Dynamic of fluids in porous media, Elsevier, New York.
16. E.S. Tarleton, R.J. Wakeman, Understanding flux decline in crossflow microfiltration: Part II - Effects of process parameters, Trans. IChemE (1994) Part A 72.
17. Lu W.M., Ju S.C. Selective particle deposition in crossflow filtration. Sep. Sci. Technol. 24(7)(8):1989;517.
18. Le Berre O., Daufin G. Skimmilk crossflow microfiltration performance versus permeation flux to wall shear stress ratio. J. Membrane Sci. 117:1996;261-270.
19. Redkar S.G., Davis R.H. Crossflow microfiltration of yeast suspensions in tubular filters. Biotechnol. Prog. 9:1993;625-634.