Phylogenetic evidence for multiple losses of a sexually selected character in phrynosomatid lizards

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 266, Issue 1428, 1999, Pages 1529-1535

  Wiens, John J ^a  

^a SECTION OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Character evolution; Display ornaments; Phrynosomatid lizards; Phylogeny; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

DISPLAY BEHAVIOR; EVOLUTION; LIZARD; PHYLOGENETICS; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ARTICLE; COLOR VISION; EVOLUTION; LIZARD; MALE; NATURAL SELECTION; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE;

AMPHIBIA; PHRYNOSOMATINAE; REPTILIA; SQUAMATA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 0033533172     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0811     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Andersson, M. 1994 Sexual selection. Princeton University Press.
2. Basolo, A. L. 1996 The phylogenetic distribution of a female preference. Syst. Biol. 45, 290-307.
3. Basolo, A. L. 1998 Evolutionary change in a receiver bias: a comparison of female preference functions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 2223-2228.
4. Burns, K. J. 1998 A phylogenetic perspective on the evolution of sexual dichromatism in tanagers (Thraupidae): the role of female versus male plumage. Evolution 52, 1219-1224.
5. Carpenter, C. C. 1978 Comparative display behavior in the genus Sceloporus (Iguanidae). Milwaukee Publ. Mus. Contrib. Biol. Geol. 18, 1-71.
6. Conant, R. & Collins, J. T. 1991 A field guide to reptiles and amphibians. Eastern and central North America, 3rd edn. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
7. Cooper Jr, W. E. & Greenberg, N. 1992 Reptilian coloration and behavior. In Biology of the Reptilia. 18. Hormones, brain, and behavior (ed. C. Gans & D. Crews), pp. 298-422. University of Chicago Press.
8. Darwin, C. 1871 The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: J. Murray.
9. de Queiroz, K. 1996 Including the characters of interest during tree reconstruction and the problems of circularity and bias in studies of character evolution. Am. Nat. 148, 700-708.
10. Emerson, S. B. 1994 Testing pattern predictions of sexual selection: a frog example. Am. Nat. 143. 848-869.
11. Endler, J. A. 1980 Natural selection on color patterns in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 34, 76-91.
12. Fitch, H. S. 1978 Sexual size differences in the lizard genus Sceloporus. Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 51, 441-461.
13. Guillette Jr, L. J., Jones, R. E., Fitzgerald, K. T. & Smith, H. M. 1980 Evolution of viviparity in the lizard genus Sceloporus. Herpetologica 36, 201-215.
14. Hill, G. E. 1993 Male mate choice and the evolution of female plumage coloration in the house finch. Evolution 47, 1515-1525.
15. Hill, G. E. 1994 Geographic variation in male ornamentation and female mate preference in the house finch: a comparative test of models of sexual selection. Behav. Ecol. 47, 1515-1525.
16. Hillis D. M. & Bull, J. J. 1993 An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42, 182-192.
17. Holland, B. & Rice, W. R. 1998 Chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52, 1-7.
18. Irwin, R. E. 1994 The evolution of plumage dichromatism in the New World blackbirds: social selection on female brightness. Am. Nat. 144, 890-907.
19. Kirkpatrick, M. & Ryan M. J. 1991 The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350, 33-38.
20. Losos, J. 1994 An approach to the analysis of comparative data when a phylogeny is unavailable or incomplete. Syst. Biol. 43, 117-123.
21. McLennan, D. A. 1996 Intregrating phylogenetic and experimental analyses: the evolution of male and female nuptial coloration in the stickleback fishes (Gasterosteidae). Syst. Biol. 45, 261-277.
22. Maddison, W. P. 1990 A method for testing the correlated evolution of two binary characters: are gains or losses concentrated on certain branches of a phylogenetic tree? Evolution 44, 539-557.
23. Maddison, W. P. & Maddison, D. R. 1992 MacClade v. 3.0. Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
24. Marchetti, K. 1993 Dark habitat and birds illustrate the role of the environment in species divergence. Nature 362, 149-152.
25. Meyer, A. E., Morrissey, J. M. & Schartl, M. 1994 Recurrent origin of a sexually selected trait in Xiphophorus fishes inferred from a molecular phylogeny. Nature 368, 539-542.
26. Omland, K. E. 1996 Female mallard preferences for multiple male ornaments. I. Natural variation. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 39, 353-360.
27. Omland, K. E. 1997 Examining two standard assumptions of ancestral reconstructions: repeated loss of dichromatism in dabbling ducks (Anatini). Evolution 5, 1636-1646.
28. Peterson, A. T. 1996 Geographic variation in sexual dichromatism in birds. Bull. Br. Ornithol. Club 116, 156-172.
29. Price, T. D. & Birch, G. L. 1996 Repeated evolution of sexual color dimorphism in birds. Auk 113, 842-848.
30. Prum, R. O. 1997 Phylogenetic tests of alternative intersexual selection mechanisms: trait macroevolution in a polygynous clade (Aves: Pipridae). Am. Nat. 149, 668-692.
31. Reeder, T. W. & Wiens, J. J. 1996 Evolution of the lizard family Phrynosomatidae as inferred from diverse types of data. Herpetol. Monogr. 10, 43-84.
32. Reimehen, T. E. 1989 Loss of nuptial coloration in threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Evolution 43, 450-460.
33. Rosenthal, G. G. & Servedio, M. R. 1999 Chase-away sexual selection: resistance to 'resistance'. Evolution 53, 296-299.
34. Sanderson, M. J. 1993 Reversibility in evolution: a maximum likelihood approach to character gain/loss bias in phylogenies. Evolution 47. 236-252.
35. Schluter D. & Price, T. 1993 Honesty, perception, and population divergence in sexually selected traits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 253. 117-122.
36. Stamps, J. A. 1983 Sexual selection, sexual dimorphism, and territoriality. In Lizard ecology: studies of a model organism (ed. R. B. Huey, E. R. Pianka & T. R. Schoener). pp. 169-204. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
37. Stebbins, R. C. 1985 A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians, 2nd edn Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
38. Trail, P. W. 1990 Why should lek-breeders be monomorphic? Evolution 44, 1837-1852.
39. Wiens, J. J. 1993 Phylogenetic systematics of the tree lizards (genus Urosaurus). Herpetologica 49, 399-420.
40. Wiens, J. J. 1995 Polymorphic characters in phylogenetic systematics. Syst. Biol. 44, 482-500.
41. Wiens, J. J. & Reeder. T. W. 1997 Phylogeny of the spiny lizards (Sceloporus) based on molecular and morphological evidence. Herpetol. Monogr. 11, 1-101.
42. Wright, D. B. 1993 Evolution of sexually dimorphic characters in peccaries (Mammalia, Tayassuidae). Paleobiology 19, 52-70.