Substrate-selective mechanisms in biocatalysis demonstrated with a versatile and efficient aldolase antibody

Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters

Volumn 9, Issue 13, 1999, Pages 1745-1750

  Shulman, Hagit ^a   Keinan, Ehud ^b  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^b SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBODY; FRUCTOSE BISPHOSPHATE ALDOLASE;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CHEMICAL REACTION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; KINETICS; POLYMERIZATION; REACTION ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

ANTIBODIES, CATALYTIC; FRUCTOSE-BISPHOSPHATE ALDOLASE; KINETICS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; SCHIFF BASES; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 0033526885     PISSN: 0960894X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0960-894X(99)00292-9     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. 1. For reviews on the aldol reaction, see: (a) Heathcock, C. H. In Asymmetric Synthesis; Morrison, J. D., Ed.; Academic: New York, 1984; Vol. 3.
2. (b) Evans, D. A.; Nelson, J. V.; Taber, T. R. Top. Stereochem. 1982, 12, 1.
3. (c) Masamune, S.; Choy, W.; Peterson, J. S.; Sita, L. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1985, 24, 1.
4. (d) Heathcock, C. H. Aldrichim. Acta 1990, 23, 99.
5. (e) Heathcock, C. H. Science 1981, 214, 395.
6. (f) Evans, D. A. Ibid. 1988, 240, 420.
7. (g) Evans, D. A.; Nelson, J. V.; Taber, T. R. Top. Stereochem. 1982, 13. 1.
8. (h) Heathcock, C. H. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Ed.; Pergamon: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 2, pp 133-319.
9. (i) Peterson, I. Pure Appl. Chem. 1992, 64, 1821.
10. For asymmetric aldol reactions, see: (j) Yanagisawa, A.; Matsumoto, Y.; Nakashima, H.; Asakawa, K.; Yamamoto, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9319 and references therein.
11. (k) Bach, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 417 and references therein.
12. (l) Yamada, Y. M. A.; Yoshikawa, N.; Sasai, H.; Shibasaki, M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1871.
13. (m) Carreira, E. M.; Lee, W.; Singer, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 3649.
14. (n) Evans, D. A.; MacMillan, D. W. C.; Campos, K. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 10859.
15. 2. (a) Hammett, L. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1937, 59, 96.
16. (b) Johnson, C. D. The Hammett Equation; Cambridge University: Cambridge 1973.
17. 3. Wagner, J.; Lerner, R. A.; Barbas III, C. F. Science 1995, 270, 1797.
18. 4. (a) Zhong, G.; Shabat, D.; List, B.; Anderson, J.; Sinha, S. C.; Lerner, R. A.; Barbas III, C.F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1998, 37, 2481.
19. (b) Hoffmann, T.; Zhong, G.; List, B.; Shabat, D.; Anderson, J.; Gramatikova, S.; Lerner, R. A.; Barbas, C. F. III J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 2768.
20. 5. Shulman, A.; Keinan, E., Submitted for publication.
21. 6. Westheimer, F. H.; Cohen, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1938, 60, 90.
22. 7. Cinnamaldehydes (R = Cl, OMe, CF3) were prepared from the appropriately substituted cinnnamic acid in a three-step sequence: esterification, DIBAL-H reduction to the corresponding alcohol, and PCC oxidation to the desired aldehydes.
23. 8. All antibody-catalyzed reactions were performed in phosphate buffered saline (50 mM phosphate, 100 mM, NaCl pH 7.4) containing 10% acetonitrile. The progress of the reactions was monitored by HPLC and initial rates were calculated by regressional analysis. Antibody concentrations were between 4-8 uM active sites. Initial rates were measured within the first 1 h of the reaction. The uncatalyzed reactions were found to be too slow to be determined under these reaction times and conditions.
24. 9. Correlation analysis in chemistry. Recent advances; Chapman, N. B., Shorter, J., Eds.; Plenum: New York, 1978; pp 455-481.
25. 10. (a) Schreck, J. O J. Chem. Ed. 1971, 48, 103.
26. (b) Apeloig, Y.; Nakash, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 9798.
27. 11. Wiberg, K. B. Physical Organic Chemistry; Wiley: New York, 1964; p 404.
28. 12. Noyce, D. S.; Snyder, L. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1959, 81, 620.
29. 13. All reactions were carried out in carbonate buffer (25 mM, pH 10.05) containing 10% acetonitrile. The progress of the reactions was monitored by HPLC. Substrate, relative rate: 1a, 1.6; 1b, 1.3; 1c, 1.5; 1d, 1.1; 1e, 1.4; 1f, 1.0.
30. 14. Barbas III, C. F.; Heine, A.; Zhong, G.; Hoffmann, T.; Gramatikova, S.; Björnestedt, R.; List, B.; Anderson, J.; Stura, E. A.; Wilson, I. A.; Lerner, R. A. Science 1997, 278, 2085
31. 15. (a) Dougherty, D. A. Science, 1996, 271, 163.
32. (b) Dougherty, D. A.; Stauffer, D. A. Science, 1990, 250, 1558.
33. (c) Harel, M.; Schalk, I.; Ehret-Sabatier, L.; Bouet, F.; Goeldner, M.; Hirth, E.; Axelsen, P. H.; Silman, I.; Sussman, J. L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1993, 90, 9031.
34. (d) Sussman, J. L.; Harel, M.; Frolow, F.; Oefner, C.; Goldman, A.; Toker, L.; Silman, I. Science 1991, 255, 872.
35. 16. (a) Wendt, K. U.; Poralla, K.; Schulz, G. E. Science 1997, 277, 1811.
36. (b) Starks, M. S.; Back, K.; Chappell, J.; Noel, J. P. Science 1997, 277, 1815.
37. (c) Lesburg, C. A.; Zhai, G.; Cane, D. E.; Christianson, D. W. Science 1997, 277, 1820.
38. (d) Paschall, C. M.; Hasserodt, J.; Jones, T.; Lerner, R. A.; Janda, K. D.; Christianson, D. W. Angew. Chem., in press.