Computer modeling of atomic force microscopy force measurements: Comparisons of Poisson, histogram, and continuum methods

Langmuir

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 207-213

  Stevens, Forrest ^a   Lo, Yu Shiu ^a   Harris, Joel M ^a   Beebe Jr , Thomas P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FORCE MEASUREMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBABILITY;

HISTOGRAM METHOD; JOHNSON-KENDALL-ROBERTS CONTINUUM METHOD; POISSON METHOD;

BOND STRENGTH (MATERIALS);

EID: 0033524316     PISSN: 07437463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/la980683k     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Wenzler, L. A.; Moyes, G. L.; Raiker, G. N.; Hansen, R. L.; Harris, J. M.; Beebe Jr., T. P. Langmuir 1997, 13, 3761-3768.
2. Wenzler, L. A.; Moyes, G. L.; Olson, L. G.; Harris, J. M.; Beebe, T. P., Jr. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69, 2855-2861.
3. Han, T.; Williams, J. M.; Beebe, T. P., Jr. Anal. Chim. Acta 1995, 307, 365-376.
4. Williams, J. M.; Han, T.; Beebe, T. P., Jr. Langmuir 1996, 12, 1291-1295.
5. Lo, Y.-S.; Huefner, N. D.; Chan, W. S.; Stevens, F.; Beebe, T. P., Jr. Langmuir, in press.
6. Moy, V. T.; Florin, E.-L.; Gaub, H. E. Science 1994, 266, 257-259.
7. Hoh, J. H.; Cleveland, J. P.; Prater, C. B.; Revel, J.-P.; Hansma, P. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 4917-4918.
8. Lee, G. U.; Kidwell, D. A.; Colton, R. J. Langmuir 1994, 10, 354-357.
9. Florin, E.-L.; Moy, V. T.; Gaub, H. E. Science 1994, 264, 415-417.
10. McKendry, R.; Theoclitou, M.-E.; Rayment, T.; Abell, C. Nature 1998, 391, 566-568.
11. Hansen, R. L.; Harris, J. M. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 2565-2575.
12. Johnson, K. L.; Kendall, K.; Roberts, A. D. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 1971, 324, 301-313.
13. van der Vegte, E. W.; Hadziioannou, G. Langmuir 1997, 13, 4357-4368.
14. 16 have argued persuasively that the bond-rupture force is not a "constant" that can be tabulated in the absence of consideration of the loading rate under which the bond was ruptured. (Conditions such as solvent, pH, etc. may also affect the measured bond force.) The measured bond-rupture forces that we have reported should therefore be considered as conditional bond-rupture forces measured under a specific set of conditions.
15. Barlow, R. J. Statistics; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, 1989; p 204.
16. Shapiro, B. E.; Qian, H. Biophys. Chem. 1997, 67, 211-219.
17. Hinterdorfer, P.; Baumgartner, W.; Gruber, H. J.; Schilcher, K.; Schindler, H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996, 93, 3477-3481.
18. Dammer, U.; Popescu, O.; Wagner, P.; Anselmetti, D.; Güntherodt, H.-J.; Misevic, G. N. Science 1995, 267, 1173-1175.
19. McKendry, R.; Theoclitou, M.-E.; Abell, C.; Rayment, T. Langmuir 1998, 14, 2846-2849.
20. Crandall, R. E. Pascal Applications for the Sciences; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1984; p 246.
21. Frisbie, C. D.; Rozsnyai, L. F.; Noy, A.; Wrighton, M.S.; Lieber, C. M. Science 1994, 265, 2071-2074.
22. Noy, A.; Frisbie, C. D.; Rozsnyai, L. F.; Wrighton, M. S.; Lieber, C. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7943-7951.
23. Evans, E.; Ritchie, K. Biophys. J. 1997, 72, 1541-1555.