-
1
-
-
11944263650
-
-
Whitesides, G. M.; Simanek, E. E.; Mathias, J. P.; Seto, C. T.; Chin, D. N.; Mammen, M.; Gordon, D. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 28, 37. Whitesides, G. M.; Mathias J. P.; Seto, C. T. Science 1991, 254, 1312.
-
(1995)
Acc. Chem. Res.
, vol.28
, pp. 37
-
-
Whitesides, G.M.1
Simanek, E.E.2
Mathias, J.P.3
Seto, C.T.4
Chin, D.N.5
Mammen, M.6
Gordon, D.M.7
-
2
-
-
0026433721
-
-
Whitesides, G. M.; Simanek, E. E.; Mathias, J. P.; Seto, C. T.; Chin, D. N.; Mammen, M.; Gordon, D. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 28, 37. Whitesides, G. M.; Mathias J. P.; Seto, C. T. Science 1991, 254, 1312.
-
(1991)
Science
, vol.254
, pp. 1312
-
-
Whitesides, G.M.1
Mathias, J.P.2
Seto, C.T.3
-
4
-
-
0000416571
-
-
Mathias, J. P.; Simanek, E. E.; Zerkowski, J. A.; Seto, C. T.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 4316.
-
(1994)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.116
, pp. 4316
-
-
Mathias, J.P.1
Simanek, E.E.2
Zerkowski, J.A.3
Seto, C.T.4
Whitesides, G.M.5
-
5
-
-
0001129717
-
-
(b) Zerkowski, J. A.; Seto, C. T.; Wierda, D. A.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 9025.
-
(1990)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.112
, pp. 9025
-
-
Zerkowski, J.A.1
Seto, C.T.2
Wierda, D.A.3
Whitesides, G.M.4
-
6
-
-
34249962207
-
-
Wang, Y.; Wei, B.; Wang, Q. J. Crystallogr. Spectrosc. Res. 1990, 20, 79.
-
(1990)
J. Crystallogr. Spectrosc. Res.
, vol.20
, pp. 79
-
-
Wang, Y.1
Wei, B.2
Wang, Q.3
-
8
-
-
0344088564
-
-
note
-
TCA decomposed when the temperature was maintained at 180°C as in the case of CA.
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
0345382070
-
-
note
-
-3. Hydrogen atoms were not included in the refinement, but including the hydrogen atoms in the calculated positions improves the R-factor by 1%.
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
0344519807
-
-
note
-
The best stacking arrangement was one with alternating CA and M molecules (with 50% occupation each), as established by the low R-factor and also by energy calculations using the MOPAC program. The least stable arrangement is the one with CA on top of another CA, as one would expect.
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
0344519808
-
-
note
-
-1 relative to CA on CA. The packing coefficient of the CA·M adduct calculated by using Cerius is 67.5%.
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
0344088563
-
-
note
-
-3. Hydrogen atoms were not included in the refinement, but including the hydrogen atoms in the calculated positions improves the R-factor by 1%. The best stacking arrangement is TCA on top of M (see (8) for details). The packing coefficient of the adduct is 74.6% as calculated from Cerius.
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
0344950604
-
-
note
-
The powder X-ray diffraction pattern of the CA·M adduct simulated on the basis of structure found by us agrees with the experimental powder pattern of the precipitate or of the polycrystalline sample.
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
33751135310
-
-
Kolotuchin, S. V.; Fenlon, E. E.; Wilson, S. R.; Loweth, C. J.; Zimmerman, S. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 2654.
-
(1995)
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
, vol.34
, pp. 2654
-
-
Kolotuchin, S.V.1
Fenlon, E.E.2
Wilson, S.R.3
Loweth, C.J.4
Zimmerman, S.C.5
-
17
-
-
0030859671
-
-
Pedireddi, V. R.; Chatterjee, S.; Ranganathan, A.; Rao, C. N. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 10867.
-
(1997)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.119
, pp. 10867
-
-
Pedireddi, V.R.1
Chatterjee, S.2
Ranganathan, A.3
Rao, C.N.R.4
|