The transformation of urban transport in the Czech Republic, 1988-1998

Transport Policy

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 225-236

  Pucher, J ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Car ownership; Czech Republic; Czechoslovakia; Modal split; Public policy; Public transport; Socialism; Urban transport

Indexed keywords

POST-COMMUNISM; PUBLIC TRANSPORT; TRANSPORTATION POLICY; URBAN TRANSPORT;

CZECH REPUBLIC;

EID: 0033511233     PISSN: 0967070X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0967-070X(99)00023-2     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Dopravni Podnik (1992-1998, annual). Annual Report Dopravni Podnik hlavniho mestra Prahy, a.s. (Prague Public Transport Company) Prague, Czech Republic.
2. Dosek, Z., 1999. Situation of urban public transport in the Czech Republic. Paper presented to the European Union Committee, UIPT, Union Internationale des Transports Publics, Brussels.
3. Institute of Transportation Engineering of Prague, 1998 (annual). Dato o Doprave v Praze, Prague, Czech Republic.
4. International Road Federation, 1997. World Road Statistics International Road Federation, Washington, DC and Geneva, Switzerland.
5. Klofac J. Transportation Engineering and Urban Transport in Czechoslovakia. Journal of the International Association of Traffic and Safety Sciences. 13:(2):1989;43-52.
6. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1999. International Road Traffic and Accident Database. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Washington, DC.
7. Pucher J. Capitalism, socialism, and urban transportation: policies and travel behavior in the East and West. Journal of the American Planning Association. 55:(3):1990;278-295.
8. Pucher J. The transport revolution in Central Europe. Transportation Quarterly. 47:(1):1993;97-113.
9. Pucher J. Road to ruin? Impacts of economic shock therapy on urban transport in Poland, Transport Policy. 2:(1):1995;5-13.
10. Pucher J. Improving public transport to save Central Europe's most beautiful city. Public Transport International. 46:(6):1997;34-40.
11. Pucher J. Urban transport in Germany: providing feasible alternatives to auto use. Transport Reviews. 18:(4):1998;285-311.
12. Sykora, L., 1995. Prague in the 1990s: changing planning strategies in the context of transition to market economy. Department of Social Geography and Regional Development, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
13. Sykora L., Simonickova I. From totalitarian urban managerialism to liberalized urban property market: Prague in the early 1990s. Barlow M., Dostal P., Hampl M. Development and Administration of Prague. 1994;University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
14. Sykorova, I., Sykora, L., 1999. Prague Metropolitan Area Urban Land Institute Market Profiles 1998: Europe. The Urban Land Institute, Washington, DC.
15. World Bank, 1997. World Development Report, The World Bank, Washington, DC.