Phylogenetic relationships in tribe Lepidieae (Brassicaceae) based on chloroplast DNA restriction site variation

Canadian Journal of Botany

Volumn 77, Issue 10, 1999, Pages 1504-1512

  Zunk, Karsten ^a   Mummenhoff, Klaus ^a   Hurka, Herbert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Chloroplast DNA; Molecular phylogeny; Restriction site variation; Tribe Lepidieae (Brassicaceae)

Indexed keywords

BRASSICA; CHLOROPLAST DNA; GENE LOCATION; GENETIC LINE; GENETIC VARIANCE; LEPIDIUM; PHYLOGENY; RESTRICTION ENZYME ANALYSIS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

EID: 0033510806     PISSN: 00084026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/cjb-77-10-1504     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Albert, V.A., Mishler, B.D., and Chase, M.W. 1992. Character state weighting for restriction site data in phylogenetic reconstruction, with examples from chloroplast DNA. In Molecular systematics of plants. Edited by P.S. Soltis, D.E. Soltis, and J.J. Doyle. Chapman & Hall, New York. pp. 369-401.
2. Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 1984. The tribes of Cruciferae (Brassicaceae) in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. Harv. Univ. 65: 343-373.
3. Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 1986. The genera of Lepidieae (Cruciferae; Brassicaceae) in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. Harv. Univ. 67: 265-311.
4. Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 1987. The genera of Alysseae (Cruciferae; Brassicaceae) in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. Harv. Univ. 68: 185-240.
5. Al-Shehbaz, I.A., and Al-Shammary, K.I. 1987. Distribution and chemosystematic significance of glucosinolates in certain middle-eastern Cruciferae. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 15: 559-569.
6. Baldwin, B.G., Kyhos, D.W., and Dvorak, J. 1990. Chloroplast DNA evolution and adaptive radiation in the Hawaiian silversword alliance (Asteraceae). Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 77: 96-109.
7. Ball, P.W., Heywood, V.H., and Akeroyd, J.R. 1993. Cruciferae. In Flora Europaea. Edited by T.G. Tutin, N.A. Burges, O.A. Chater, J.R. Edmondson, V.H. Heywood, D.M. Moore, D.H. Valentine, S.M. Walters, and D.A. Webb. 2nd ed., Vol. 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. pp. 313-417.
8. Bayer, A. 1905. Beiträge zur systematischen Gliederung der Cruciferen. Beih. Bot. Centralbl. 18: 119-180.
9. Bruneau, A., and Doyle, J.J. 1993. Cladistic analysis of cpDNA restriction site characters in Erythrina (Leguminosae: Phaseoleae). Syst. Bot. 18: 229-247.
10. Chase, M.W., and Hills, H.H. 1991. Silica gel: An ideal material for field preservation of leaf samples for DNA studies. Taxo, 40: 215-220.
11. Daxenbichler, M.E., van Etten, C.H., Brown, F.S., and Jones, Q. 1964. Oxaolidinethiones and volatile isothiocyanates in enzyme-treated seed meals from 65 species of Cruciferae. Agric. Food Chem. 12: 127-130.
12. Daxenbichler, M.E., Spencer, G.F., Carlson, D.G., Rose, G.B., Brinker, A.M., and Powell, R.G. 1991. Glucosinolate composition of seeds from 297 species of wild plants. Phytochemistry, 38: 2623-2638.
13. de Candolle, A.P. 1821. Regni vegetabilis systema naturale, vol 2. Treuttel et Würz, Paris, France.
14. Doyle, J.J. 1991. The pros and cons of DNA systematic data: studies of the wild perennial relatives of soybean. Evol. Trends Plants, 5: 99-104.
15. Doyle, J.J., and Doyle, J.L. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19: 11-15.
16. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 93: 783-791.
17. Francisco-Ortega, J., Fuertes-Aguilar, J., Gomez-Campo, C., Santos-Guerra, A., and Jansen, R.K. 1999. ITS sequence phylogeny of Crambe L. (Brassicaceae): Molecular data reveal two Old Worl disjunctions. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 11: 361-380.
18. Franzke, A., Pollmann, K., Kohrt, R., and Hurka, H. 1998. Molecular systematics of Cardamine and allied genera (Brassicaceae): ITS and non-coding chloroplast DNA. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 33: 225-240.
19. Galloway, G.L., Malmberg, R.L., and Price, R.A. 1998. Phylogenetic utility of the nuclear gene arginine decarboxylase: an example from Brassicaceae. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15: 1312-1320.
20. Gielly, L., and Taberlet, P. 1996. A phylogeny of the European gentians inferred from chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron sequences. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 120: 57-75.
21. Hayek, A. 1911. Entwurf eines Cruciferensystems auf phylogenetischer Grundlage. Beih. Bot. Centralbl. 27: 127-335.
22. Hedge, I.C. 1976. A systematic and geographical survey of the Old World Cruciferae. In The biology and chemistry of the Cruciferae. Edited by J.G. Vaughan, A.J. MacLeod, and M.B. Jones. Academic Press, London, England, pp. 1-45.
23. Hillis, D.M., and Bull, J.J. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42: 182-192.
24. Hillis, D.M., and Huelsenbeck, J.P. 1992. Signal, noise, and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analyses. J. Hered. 83: 189-195.
25. Holsinger, K.E., and Jansen, R.K. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of restriction site data. Methods Enzymol. 224: 439-455.
26. Janchen, E. 1942. Das System der Cruciferen. Oesterr. Bot. Z. 91: 1-28.
27. Jaretzky, R. 1928. Untersuchungen über Chromosomen und Phylogenie bei einigen Cruciferen. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. 68: 1-45.
28. Kellog, E.A., and Watson, L. 1993. Phylogenetic studies of a large data set. I. Bambusoideae, Andropogonaceae, and Pooidae (Gramineae). Bot. Rev. 59: 273-343.
29. Kjær, A. 1960. Naturally derived iso-thiocyanates (mustard oils) and their parent glucosinolates. Fortschr. Chem. Org. Naturst. 18: 122-176.
30. Koch, M., Hurka, H., and Mummenhoff, K. 1996. Chloroplast DNA restriction site variation and RAPD-analyses in Cochlearia (Brassicaceae): Biosystematics and speciation. Nord. J. Bot. 16: 585-605.
31. Koch, M., Mummenhoff, K., and Hurka, H. 1998. Molecular biogeography and evolution of the Micothlaspi perfoliatum s.l. polyploidy complex (Brassicaceae): chloroplast DNA and nuclear ribosomal DNA restriction site variation. Can. J. Bot. 76: 382-396.
32. Maddison, D.R. 1991. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most parsimonious trees. Syst. Zool. 40: 315-328.
33. Markgraf, F. 1963. Cruciferae. In G. Hegi, Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa. 2nd ed., vol 4 (1). Edited by F. Markgraf. Hauser, Munich, pp. 73-514.
34. Meyer, F.K. 1973. Conspectus der "Thlaspi" Arten Europas, Afrikas und Vorderasiens. Feddes Repert. 84: 449-410.
35. Meyer, F.K. 1979. Kritische Revision der "Thlaspi" Arten Europas, Afrikas und Vorderasiens. Feddes Repert. 90: 129-154.
36. Mikolajczak, K.L., Miwa, T.K., Earle, F.R., and Wolff, I.A. 1961. Search for new industrial oils. V. Oils of Cruciferae. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 38: 678-691.
37. Miller, R.W., Earle, F.R., and Wolff, I.A. 1965. Search for new industrial oils. XIII. Oils from 102 species of Cruciferae. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 42: 817-821.
38. Mukherjee, K.D., Kiewitt, I., and Hurka, H. 1984. Lipid content and fatty acid composition of seeds of Capsella species from different geographical localities. Phytochemistry, 23: 117-119.
39. Mummenhoff, K., and Koch, M. 1994. Chloroplast DNA restriction site Variation and phylogenetic relationships in the genus Thlaspi sensu lato (Brassicaceae). Syst. Bot. 19: 73-88.
40. Mummenhoff, K., Kuhnt, E., Koch, M., and Zunk, K. 1995. Systematic implications of chloroplast DNA variation in Lepidium sections Cardamon, Lepiocardamon and Lepia (Brassicaceae). Plant. Syst. Evol. 196: 75-88.
41. Mummenhoff, K., Franzke, A., and Koch, M. 1997a. Molecular data reveal convergence in fruit characters used in the classification of Thlaspi s.l. (Brassicaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 125: 183-199.
42. Mummenhoff, K., Franzke, A., and Koch, M. 1997b. Molecular phylogenetics of Thlaspi s.l. (Brassicaceae) based on sequences of the internal transcribed spacers of the nuclear ribosomal DNA. Can. J. Bot. 75: 469-482.
43. Olmstead, R.G., and Palmer, J.D. 1994. Chloroplast DNA systematics: A review of methods and data analysis. Am. J. Bot. 81: 1205-1224.
44. Price, R.A., Palmer, J.D., and Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 1994. Systematic relationships of Arabidopsis: A molecular and morphological perspective. In Arabidopsis. Edited by E.M. Meyerowitz and C. Somerville. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. pp. 7-19.
45. Rodman, J.E. 1991. A taxonomic analysis of glucosinolate-producing plants, part 2: cladistics. Syst. Bot. 16: 619-629.
46. Rodman, J.E., Price, R.A., Karo, L.K., Conti, E., Sytsma, K.J., and Pakner, J.D. 1993. Nucleotide sequences of the rbcL gene indicate monophyly of mustard oil plants. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 80: 686-699.
47. Schulz, O.E. 1936. Cruciferae. In Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 17B. Edited by A. Engler and K. Prantl. Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany. pp. 227-658.
48. Shaw, E.A. 1965. Taxonomic revision of some Australian endemic genera of Cruciferae. Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 89: 145-253.
49. Swofford, D.L. 1993. PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1.1 for Macintosh. Illinois Nat. Hist. Survey, Champaign, Ill
50. Vaughan, J.G., and Whitehouse, J.M. 1971. Seed structure and the taxonomy of the Cruciferae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 64: 383-409.
51. Wagstaff, S.J., Olmstead, R.G., and Cantino, P.D. 1995. Parsimony analysis of cpDNA restriction site variation in subfamily Nepetoideae (Labiatae). Am. J. Bot. 82: 886-892.
52. Warwick, S.I., and Black, L.D. 1991. Molecular systematics of Brassica and allied genera (subtribe Brassicinae, Brassiceae) -chloroplast genome and cytodeme congruence. Theor. Appl. Genet. 82: 81-92.
53. Warwick, S.L, and Black, L.D. 1997. Molecular phylogenies from theory to application in Brassica and allies (tribe Brassiceae, Cruciferae). Opera Bot. 132: 149-168.
54. Watrous, L.E., and Wheeler, Q.D. 1981. The outgroup comparison method of character analysis. Syst. Zool. 30: 1-11.
55. Whitton, J., Wallace, R.S., and Jansen, R.K. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships and patterns of character change in the tribe Lactuceae (Asteraceae) based on chloroplast DNA restriction site variation. Can. J. Bot. 73: 1058-1073.
56. Zunk, K., Mummenhoff, K., Koch, M., and Hurka, H. 1996. Phylogenetic relationships of Thlaspi s.l. (subtribe Thlaspidinae, Lepidieae) and allied genera based on chloroplast DNA restriction-site variation. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92: 375-381.