Two requirements for obtaining valid common patterns under different assumptions in vicariance biogeography

Cladistics

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 393-406

  Van Veller, Marco G P ^a   Zandee, M ^a   Kornet, D J ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Assumptions; Common pattern; Explanatory power; Inclusion; Single assumption comparison; Solution sets; Vicariance biogeography

Indexed keywords

BIOGEOGRAPHY; CLADISTICS;

EID: 0033504918     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/clad.1999.0119     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Brooks D. R. Parsimony analysis in historical biogeography and coevolution: Methodological and theoretical update. Syst. Zool. 39:1990;14-30.
2. Enghoff H. Widespread taxa, sympatry, dispersal and an algorithm for resolved area cladograms. Cladistics. 12:1996;349-364.
3. Fitch W. M. Distinguishing homologous from analogous proteins. Syst. Zool. 19:1970;99-113.
4. Humphries C. J. Vicariance biogeography in Mesoamerica. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 69:1982;444-463.
5. Humphries C. J., Parenti L. R. Cladistic Biogeography. 1986;Clarendon Press, Oxford.
6. Kluge A. G. Parsimony in vicariance biogeography: A quantitative method and a Greater Antillean example. Syst. Zool. 37:1988;315-328.
7. Ladiges P. Y. Biogeography after Burbidge. Aust. Syst. Bot. 11:1998;231-242.
8. Morrone J. J., Carpenter J. M. In search of a method for cladistic biogeography: An empirical comparison of component analysis, Brooks parsimony analysis and three-area statements. Cladistics. 10:1994;99-153.
9. Morrone J. J., Crisci J. V. Historical biogeography: Intro duction to methods. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26:1995;373-401.
10. Nelson G., Ladiges P. Y. Three area statements: Standard assumptions for biogeographic analysis. Syst. Zool. 40:1991a;470-485.
11. Nelson G., Ladiges P. Y. Standard assumptions for biogeographic analysis. Aust. Syst. Bot. 4:1991b;41-58.
12. Nelson G., Ladiges P. Y. Paralogy in cladistic biogeogra phy and analysis of paralogy-free subtrees. Am. Museum Novitates. 3167:1996;1-58.
13. Nelson G., Platnick N. I. Systematics and Biogeography: Cladistics and Vicariance. 1981;Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
14. Page R. D. M. Quantitative cladistic biogeography: Constructing and comparing area cladograms. Syst. Zool. 37:1988;254-270.
15. Page R. D. M. Comments on component compatibility in historical biogeography. Cladistics. 5:1989;167-182.
16. Page R. D. M. Component analysis: A valiant failure? Cladistics. 6:1990;119-136.
17. Page R. D. M. Genes, organisms and areas: The problem of multiple lineages. Syst. Biol. 42:1993;77-84.
18. Patterson C. Molecules and Morphology in Evolution: Conflict or Compromise? 1987;Cambridge Univ. Press. Cambridge, London, New York, New Rochelle, Melbourne, Sydney.
19. Platnick N. I. Systematics, evolution and biogeography: A Dutch treat. Cladistics. 4:1988;308-313.
20. Rosen D. E. Vicariant patterns and historical explanation in biogeography. Syst. Zool. 27:1978;159-188.
21. Van Soest R. W. M. Recoding widespread distributions in general area cladogram construction. Vie Milieu. 46:1996;155-161.
22. Wiley E. O. Parsimony analysis and vicariance biogeography. Syst. Zool. 37:1988a;271-290.
23. Wiley E. O. Vicariance biogeography. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19:1988b;513-542.
24. Zandee M., Roos M. C. Component-compatibility in historical biogeography. Cladistics. 3:1987;305-332.