The migraine work and productivity loss questionnaire: Concepts and design

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 8, Issue 8, 1999, Pages 699-710

  Lerner, Debra J ^a   Amick III, B C ^a   Malspeis, S ^a   Rogers, W H ^a   Santanello, N C ^b   Gerth, W C ^b   Lipton, R B ^c  

^a TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (United States)

^c ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Migraine; Quality of Life; Work Productivity

Indexed keywords

BUTALBITAL; COCODAMOL; ERGOTAMINE; NARCOTIC AGENT; NONSTEROID ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT; SUMATRIPTAN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; JOB PERFORMANCE; MALE; MIGRAINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; WORK;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MIGRAINE DISORDERS; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 0033504895     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008920510098     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. 1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias, and facial pain. Cephalalgia 1998; 8(Suppl 7): 19-29.
2. 2. Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Celentano DD, et al. Prevalence of migraine headache in the United States. JAMA 1992; 267: 64-69.
3. 3. Lipton RB, Stewart WF, von Korff M. Burden of migraine: Societal costs and therapeutic opportunities. Neurology 1997; 48(Suppl 3): S4-S9.
4. 4. Osterhaus JT, Townsend RJ, Gandek B, Ware Jr. JE. Measuring the functional status and well-being of patients with migraine headache. Headache 1994; 34(6): 337-343.
5. 5. Stang PE, Osterhaus JT. Impact of migraine in the United States: Data from the National Health Interview Survey. Headache 1993; 33: 29-35.
6. 6. Hartmaier SL, Santanello NC, Epstein RS, Silberstein SD. Development of a brief 24-hour migraine-specific quality of life questionnaire. Headache 1995; 35: 320-329.
7. 7. Mushet GR, MilleR D, Clements B, Pait G, Gutterman DL. Impact of Sumatriptan on workplace productivity, nonwork activities, and health-related quality of life among hospital employees with migraine. Headache 1996; 36: 137-143.
8. 8. Miller DW, Martin BC, Loo CM. Sumatriptan and lost productivity time: A time series analysis of diary data. Clinical Therapeutics 1996; 18(6): 1263-1265.
9. 9. Osterhaus JT, Gutterman DL, Plachetka JR. Healthcare resource and lost labour costs of migraine headache in the US. PharmacoEconomics 1992; 2(1): 67-76.
10. 10. Cull RE, Wells NEJ, Miocevich ML. The economic cost of migraine. British Journal of Economics 1992; 2: 103-115.
11. 11. Green J. A survey of migraine in England 1975-1976. Headache 1997; 17: 67-68.
12. 12. Jones A, Harrop C. Study of migraine and the treatment of acute attacks in industry. Journal of Internal Medicine Research 1980; 8: 321-325.
13. 13. Legg RF, Sclar DA, Nemec NL, Tarnai J, Mackowiak JI. Cost benefit of Sumatriptan to an employer. JOEM 1997; 39(7): 654-657.
14. 14. von Korff M, Stewart WF, Simon DJ, Lipton RB. Migraine and reduced work performance. A population-based diary study. Neurology 1998; 50(June): 1741-1745.
15. 15. Reilly MC, Zbrozek AS, Dukes EM. The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and activity impairment instrument. PharmacoEconomics 1993; 4(5): 353-365.
16. 16. Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Simon D. Work-related disability. Results from the American migraine study. Cephalalgia 1996; 16: 231-238.
17. 17. Burkhauser R, Daly M. Employment and economic well-being following the onset of a disability. In: Mashaw J, Reno V, Burkhauser R, Berkowitz M (eds). Disability, Work, and Cash Benefits. W.E. Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, 1996; 59-101.
18. 18. Celantano DD, Stewart WF, Lipton RB, et al. Medication use and disability among migraineurs: A national probability sample survey. Headache 1992; 32: 223-228.
19. 19. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use, 2nd Edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
20. 20. Sudman S, Bradburn NM, Schwarz N. Thinking About Answers: The Application of Cognitive Processes to Survey Methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publications, 1996.
21. 21. Fowler Jr. FJ, Cannel CF. Using behavioral coding to identify cognitive problems with survey questions. In: Schwarz N, Sudman S (eds). Answering Questions: Methodology for Determining Cognitive and Communicative Processes in Survey Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1996; 15-36.
22. 22. Nagi SZ. Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. In: Sussman MB (ed.). Sociology and Rehabilitation. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, 1965.
23. 23. Pope AM, Tarlov AR (eds). Disability in America: Toward a National Agenda for Prevention. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1991.
24. 24. Verbrugge LM. The iceberg of disability. In: Stahl SM (ed.). The Legacy of Longevity: Health and Health Care in Later Life. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1990: 55-75.
25. 25. World Health Organization. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 1980.
26. 26. Lerner DJ, Bungay KM. Measuring work outcomes. In: PharmacoEconomics and Outcomes: Applications for Patient Care. Module 3: Assessment of Humanistic Outcomes. Kansas City, MO: American College of Clinical Pharmacy, 1997; 171-185.
27. 27. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. Chartbook on Work Disability in the United States. Washington DC: US Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, 1991.
28. 28. Ware Jr. JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30(6): 473-483.
29. 29. Torrance GW, Furlong W, Feeney D, Boyle M. Multi-attribute preference functions. Health Utilities Index. PharmacoEconomics 1995; 7(6): 503-520.
30. 30. Biddle BJ. Role theory. In: Borgatta EF, Borgatta ML (eds). Encyclopedia of Sociology. New York: McMillan Publishing Company, 1992; 1681-1685.
31. 31. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. 3rd Edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
32. 32. Debus M, Novelli P. Handbook for Excellence in Focus Group Research. Washington, DC: Academy for Educational Development, 1988.
33. 33. McCormick EJ, Jeanneret PR, Mecham RC. The Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1989.
34. 34. Employment and Training Administration, US. Employment Service. Dictionary of Occupational Titles, 4th Edn. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor, 1991.
35. 35. US Department of Labor. O*NET Project. Washington, DC: ETA/Office of Policy and Research, 1999.
36. 36. Davis JA, Smith TW. The NORC General Social Survey: A User's Guide. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1992.
37. 37. Gold MR, et al. (eds). Cost Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
38. 38. Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL, Wells KB. Role functioning meaures. In: Stewart AL, Ware Jr. JE (eds). The Medical Outcomes Study Approach. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1992; 205-219.
39. 39. Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Liberman J. Variation in migraine prevalence by race. Neurology 1996; 47: 52-59.
40. 40. McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.