Validation of SpraySafe Manager, an aerial herbicide application decision support system

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 29, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 875-882

  Ray, John W ^a   Richardson, Brian ^a   Schou, Wayne C ^a   Teske, Milton E ^b   Vanner, Arthur L ^a   Coker, Graham W R ^a  

^a SCION   (New Zealand)

^b Continuum Dynamics Inc ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES; HERBICIDES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SPRAYING; WEED CONTROL;

COMPUTER-BASED AERIAL APPLICATION MODELS; HERBICIDE-PLANT DOSE-RESPONSE CURVES; SOFTWARE PACKAGE SPRAYSAFE MANAGER;

FORESTRY;

FOREST MANAGEMENT; HERBICIDE; MODEL; WEED CONTROL;

MIMOSA;

EID: 0033500540     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/x99-054     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Abramowitz, M., and Stegun, I.A. 1964. Handbook of mathematical functions. National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C. Appl. Math. Ser. 55. Equation 7.1.26.
2. Amsden, R.C. 1960. The Baltin-Amsden formula. Agric. Aviat. 2: 95.
3. Banaugh, R. 1984. A method for comparing cost and productivity of aerial spray delivery. USDA Forest Service, Missoula, Mont. Rep. 8434-2807.
4. Bilanin, A.J., Teske, M.E., Barry, J.W., and Ekblad, R.B. 1989. AGDISP: the aircraft spray dispersion model code development and experiment validation. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 32(1): 327-334.
5. Bird, S.L., Perry, S.G., Ray, S.L., Teske, M.E., and Scherer, P.N. 1997. An evaluation of AgDRIFT 1.0 for use in aerial application. Draft report. National Exposure Research Laboratory, Ecosystems Division, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, Ga.
6. Carlton, J.B., and Bouse, L.F. 1987. Exploring aerial spray sampling with a cylindrical collector. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, Mich. ASAE Pap. No. 87-1070.
7. Carlton, J.B., and Bouse, L.F., Witz, J.A., and O'Neal, H.P. 1985. Automating aerial spray deposit analysis. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 18(1): 1401-1405.
8. Curbishley, T.B., Teske, M.E., and Barry, J.W. 1993. Validation of the CASPR spray aircraft efficiency model. Appl. Eng. Agric. 9: 199-203.
9. Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R.J. 1993. An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New York.
10. Goering, C.E., and Butler, B.J. 1975. Paired field studies of herbicide drift: Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 18(1): 27-34
11. Ray, J.W., Vanner, A.L., and Richardson, B. 1992. Productivity of fixed and rotary winged aircraft. New Zealand Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, Bull. No. 156. pp. 254-258.
12. Ray, J.W., Vanner, A.L. Richardson, B., and Coker, G. 1996. Determination of the no observable effect level (NOEL) of four commonly used forestry herbicides on tomatoes. In Proceedings of the 49th New Zealand Plant Protection Conference, 13-15 Aug. 1996, Nelson, N.Z. Edited by M. O'Callaghan. The New Zealand Protection Society Inc., Palmerston North, N.Z. pp. 188-191.
13. Richardson, B., and Goldingham, F. 1987. Aerial application productivity program: user manual. New Zealand Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, Bull. No. 118.
14. Richardson, B., Ray, J.W., ad Vanner, A.L. 1986. Retention of spray on bracken pinnae; effect of application volume and formulation. N.Z. J. For. Sci. 16(1): 87-95.
15. Richardson, B., Ray, J, and Vanner, A. 1989. Evaluation of techniques to measure aerial deposition. In Proceedings of the 42nd New Zealand Plant Weed and Pest Control Conference, 8-10 Aug. 1989, New Plymouth, N.Z. Edited by A.J. Popay. The New Zealand Weed and Pest Control Society Inc., Palmerston North, N.Z. pp. 132-136.
16. Richardson, B., Ray, J, and Vanner, A. 1990. Factors affecting spray deposition following the aerial application of herbicides. In Proceedings of the 9th Australian Weeds Conference, 6-10 Aug. 1990, Adelaide, South Australia. Edited by J.W. Heap. The Crop Science Society of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia.
17. Richardson, B., Ray, J.W., and Vanner, A.L. 1993. Quantification of herbicide spray deposit variation following aerial application in forestry operations. In Proceedings of the 46th New Zealand Plant Protection Conference, 10-12 Aug. 1993, Christchurch, N.Z. Edited by A.J. Popay. The New Zealand Weed and Pest Control Society Inc., Palmerston North, N.Z. pp. 319-324.
18. Richardson, B., Ray, J., Miller, K., Vanner, A., and Davenhill, N. 1995. Evaluation of FSCBG, an aerial application simulation model. Appl. Eng. Agric. 11: 485-494.
19. SAS Institute, Inc. 1987. SAS/STAT® guide for personal computers, version 6.12. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, N.C.
20. Streibig, J.C. 1989. The herbicide dose-response curve and the economics of weed control. In Proceedings, Brighton Crop Protection Conference, Weeds, 20-23 Nov. 1989, Brighton, England. The British Crop Protection Council, Farnham, Surrey, U.K. pp. 927-935.
21. Streibig, J.C., Rudemo, M., and Jensen, J.E. 1993. Dose-response curves and statistical models. In Herbicide bioassays. Edited by J.C. Streibig and P. Kudsk. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla. pp. 29-55.
22. Teske, M.E. 1995. Five years of FSCBG development - a statement of progress. USDA Forest Service, Davis, Calif. Rep. No. FPM 95-4.
23. Teske, M.E. 1996a. The status of FSCBG and related model developments - a 1996 update. USDA Forest Service, Davis, Calif. Rep. No. FHTET 96-17.
24. Teske, M.E. 1996b. Evaluation of the FSCBG aerial spray model's near-wake sensitivity to Selected input parameters. USDA Forest Service, Davis, Calif. Rep. No. FHTET 96-30.
25. Teske, M.E., Bowers, J.F., Rafferty J.E., and Barry, J.W. 1993. FSCBG: An aerial spray dispersion model for predicting the fate of released material behind aircraft. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 12: 453-464.