Irrigation organization in Mexican unidades de riego

Irrigation and Drainage Systems

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 55-74

  Dayton Johnson, Jeff ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Collective action; Irrigation performance; Mexico; Performance indicators; Rules; Unidades de riego

Indexed keywords

FARMS; MAINTENANCE; MANAGEMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PERFORMANCE; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; WATER SUPPLY;

COLLECTIVE ACTION; IRRIGATION ORGANIZATION; MEXICO; PERFORMANCE INDICATORS;

IRRIGATION;

IRRIGATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; WATER MANAGEMENT;

IRRIGATION; ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; WATER MANAGEMENT;

MEXICO;

EID: 0033498166     PISSN: 01686291     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Aguilar Sánchez G. 1993. Las regiones agrícolas de Guanajuato, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Chapingo, Texcoco, Edo. de México.
2. Baland J.-M. & Platteau J.-P. 1996. Halting degradation of natural resources: Is there a role for rural communities? Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
3. CNA. 1992. Diagnóstico per muestreo de las unidades de riego para el desarrollo rural (URDERAL) en los estados de Guanajuato y Zacatecas, Comisión Nacional del Agua, México, D.F.
4. CNA. 1994. La ley de aguas nacionales y su reglameto. Comisión Nacional del Agua, México, D.F
5. Coward E.W. Jr. (ed) 1980. Irrigation and agricultural development in Asia: Perspectives from the social sciences. Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London.
6. Cruz Galindo, M. 1994. Semblanza histórica de las unidades de riego para el desarrollo rural. SARH, Subsecretaría de Agricultura, Dirección General de Política Agrícola, México, D.F.
7. Dayton-Johnson J. 1998a. Choosing rules to govern the commons: A model with evidence from Mexico, mimeo. Department of Economics, Dalhousie University.
8. Dayton-Johnson J. 1998b. The determinants of collective action on the local commons: Theory with evidence from Mexico, mimeo. Department of Economics, Dalhousie University.
9. Dayton-Johnson J. 1998c. The economics of farmer-managed irrigation: A review essay, mimeo. Department of Economics, Dalhousie University.
10. Doorenbos J. & Kassam A.H. 1979. Yield response to water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 33. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.
11. FAO. 1994. La agriculture de riego en Méxco, Proyecto UTC/MEX/030/MEX EL-08-94, Documento Técnico No. 8. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.
12. Gorriz C.M., Subramanian A. & Simas J. 1995. Irrigation management transfer in Mexico: Process and progress. Technical Paper No. 292. The World Bank.
13. IME 1996. International Financial Statistics. June. International Monetary Fund.
14. Johnson S.H. III. 1998. Irrigation management transfer in Mexico: A strategy to achieve irrigation district sustainability, IIMI Research Report No. 16. International Irrigation Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
15. Johnson S.H. III, Vermillion D.L. & Sagardoy J.A. 1995. Irrigation Management Transfer. FAO Technical Papers/Water Reports No. 5. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.
16. Kloezen W.H., Ramírez J.J. & Melgarejo M. 1996. La planeación del manejo de riego en el Módulo Salvatierra del DR 011, Alto Río Lerma. In: E. Palacios Vélez, J. Chávez Morales, A. Exebui García, E. Gubiños Panta, and E. Mejía Saenz (Eds) Seminario Internacional, Transferencia de los Sistemas de Riego, Memorias, Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillo, Edo. de México.
17. Kloezen W.H. & Garcés-Restrepo C. 1998. Assessing irrigation performance with comparative indicators: The case of the Alto Río Lerma District, Mexico. IWMI Research Report No. 22, International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
18. Lam W.F. 1998. Governing irrigation systems in Nepal: Institutions, infrastructure, and collective action. ICS Press, Oakland, California.
19. Levine G. 1982. Relative water supply: An explanatory variable for irrigation systems. The Determinants of Irrigation Project Problems in Developing Countries. Technical Report No. 6, Cornell and Rutgers Universities.
20. Lewis H.T. 1980. Irrigation societies in the Northern Philippines. In Coward (1980, pp. 153-171).
21. Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, New York.
22. Perry C. 1996. Quantification and measurement of a minimum set of indicators of the performance of irrigation systems, mimeo. International Irrigation Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
23. SARH. 1992. Las unidades de riego para el desarrollo rural en el estado de Guanajuato, Secretaría de Agricultura y Recursos Hidráulicos, Delegación Estatal, Celaya, Guanajuato, México.
24. SARH. 1994. Características generales de las unidades de riego. Secretaría de Agricultura y Recursos Hidráulicos. Subsecretaría de Agricultura, Dirección General de Política Agrícola, Coordinación del Programs Uso Eficiente del Agua y de la Energía Eléctrica, México, D.F.
25. Smith M. 1993. CLIMWAT for CROPWAT: A climatic database for irrigation planning and management. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 49. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.
26. Stephen L. 1997. Pro-Zapatista and Pro-PRI: Resolving the contradictions of zapatismo in rural Oaxaca, Latin American Research Review, 41-70.
27. Tang S.Y. 1994. Institutions and performance in irrigation systems. In: Ostrom, Gardner & Walker. Rules, games, and common-pool resources. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
28. Yoder R. 1994. Locally managed irrigation systems: Essential tasks and implications for assistance, management transfer and turnover program. International Irrigation Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.