Background to the general method of shear design in the 1994 CSA-A23.3 standard

Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 827-839

  Rahal, Khaldoun N ^a,b   Collins, Michael P ^a  

^a KUWAIT UNIVERSITY   (Kuwait)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Beams; Building codes; Crack width and spacing; Diagonal cracking; Reinforced concrete; Shear strength; Size effect in shear; Structural design

Indexed keywords

BEAMS AND GIRDERS; BENDING MOMENTS; BUILDING CODES; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTATION THEORY; CRACK INITIATION; NUMERICAL METHODS; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SHEAR STRENGTH; STRUCTURAL DESIGN; STRUCTURAL LOADS;

MODIFIED COMPRESSION FIELD THEORY; SHEAR DESIGN;

CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION;

BUILDING; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SHEAR STRESS; STANDARD;

EID: 0033497329     PISSN: 03151468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/l99-050     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. ACI. 1995. Building code requirements for reinforced concrete (ACI 318-95) and commentary (ACI 318 R-95). Committee 318, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Mich.
2. Collins, M.P. 1978. Towards a rational theory for RC members in shear. ASCE Journal of the Structural Division, 104(ST4): 649-666.
3. Collins, M.P., and Mitchell, D. 1980. Shear and torsion design of prestressed and non-prestressed concrete beams. Journal of the Prestressed Concrete Institute, 25(5): 32-100.
4. Collins, M.P., and Mitchell, D. 1991. Prestressed concrete structures. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
5. Collins, M.P., Mitchell, D., Adebar, P.E., and Vecchio, F.J. 1996. A general shear design method. ACI Structural Journal, 93(1): 36-45.
6. CSA. 1984. Design of concrete structures for buildings. Standard A23.3-M84, Canadian Standards Association, Etobicoke, Ont.
7. CSA. 1994. Design of concrete structures for buildings. Standard A23.3-94, Canadian Standards Association, Etobicoke, Ont.
8. Kani, G.N.J. 1967. How safe are our large reinforced concrete beams? Journal of the American Concrete Institute, 64: 128-141.
9. Kirschner, U., and Collins, M.P. 1986. Investigating the behaviour of reinforced concrete shell elements. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont., Publication No. 86-09.
10. Mitchell, D., and Collins, M.P. 1974. Diagonal compression field theory - a rational model for structural concrete in pure torsion. Journal of the American Concrete Institute, 71: 396-408.
11. Rahal, K.N., and Collins, M.P. 1995. Analysis of sections subjected to combined shear and torsion - a theoretical model. ACI Structural Journal, 92(4): 459-469.
12. Ritter, W. 1899. Die Bauweise Hennebique, Schweiserische Bauzeitung, Zurich, Switzerland.
13. Shioya, T. 1989. Shear properties of large reinforced concrete member. Institute of Technology, Shimizu Corporation, Tokyo, Japan, Special Report No. 25.
14. Vecchio, F.J., and Collins, M.P. 1986. The modified compression field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear. ACI Journal, 83(2): 219-231.
15. Vecchio, F.J., and Collins, M.P. 1988. Predicting the response of reinforced concrete beams subjected to shear using the modified compression field theory. ACI Structural Journal, 85(4): 258-268.
16. Walraven, J.C. 1981. Fundamental analysis of aggregate interlock. ASCE Journal of the Structural Division, 107(ST11): 2245-2270.