Psychometric properties of the Boston Qualitative Scoring System for the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure

Clinical Neuropsychologist

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 442-449

  Folbrecht, Jeanelle R ^a,b   Charter, Richard A ^a   Walden, Dennis K ^a   Dobbs, Sharon M ^a  

^a VA LONG BEACH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^b CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PSYCHOMETRY; RELIABILITY;

EID: 0033497235     PISSN: 13854046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1076/1385-4046(199911)13:04;1-Y;FT442     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Charter, R.A. (1995). The under-representation of Horst's modification of the KR-20 reliability coefficient. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81, 770.
2. Charter, R.A. (1996). Revisiting the standard errors of measurement, estimate, and prediction and their application to test scores. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 1139-1144.
3. Charter, R.A. (1997). Confidence interval procedures for retest, alternate-form, validity, and alpha coefficients. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 1488-1490.
4. Charter, R.A., & Feldt, L.S. (1996). Testing the equality of two alpha coefficients. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 763-768.
5. Chervinsky, A.B., Mitrushina, M., & Satz, P. (1992). Comparison of four methods of scoring the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure drawing test on four age groups of normal elderly. Brain Dysfunction, 5, 267-287.
6. Cicchetti, D.V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284-290.
7. Denman, S.B. (1984). Manual for the Denman Neuropsychology Memory Scale. Charleston, SC: S.B. Denman.
8. Feldt, L.S. (1965). The approximate sampling distribution of Kuder-Richardson reliability coefficients twenty. Psychometrika, 30, 357-370.
9. Feldt, L.S., Woodruff, D.J., & Salih, F.A. (1987). Statistical inference for coefficient alpha. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 93-103.
10. Folbrecht, J.R., Webster, J.S., Charter, R.A., & Endicott, A.K. (1999). The Boston Qualitative Scoring System for the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure drawing: Sensitivity to unilateral neglect. Manuscript submitted for publication.
11. Horst, P. (1953). Correcting the Kuder-Richardson reliability for dispersion of item difficulties. Psychological Bulletin, 50, 371-374.
12. Lezak, M.D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. Osterrieth, P.A. (1944). Le test de copie d'une figure complex: Contribution à l'étude de la perception et de la memoire. Archives de Psychologie, 30, 286-356.
15. Overall, J.E., & Magee, K.N. (1992). Estimating individual rater reliabilities. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 77-85.
16. Rapport, L.J., Charter, R.A., Dutra, R.L., Farchione, T.J., & Kingsley, J.J. (1996). Psychometric properties of the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure: Lezak versus Denman scoring system. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 11, 46-53.
17. Rapport, L.J., Farchione, T.J., Dutra, R.L., Webster, J.S., & Charter, R. (1996). Measures of hemi-inattention on the Rey figure copy by the Lezak-Osterrieth scoring method. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 10, 450-454.
18. nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Stern, R.A., Singer, E.A., Duke, L.M., Singer, N.G., Morey, C.E., Daughtry, E.W., & Kaplan, E. (1994). The Boston Qualitative Scoring System for the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure: Description and interrater reliability. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 8, 309-322.