CAFE compliance by light trucks: Economic impacts of clean diesel engine

Energy Policy

Volumn 27, Issue 15, 1999, Pages 889-900

  Teotia, Arvind ^a   Vyas, Anant ^a   Cuenca, Rolando ^a   Stodolsky, Frank ^a   Eberhardt, James ^b  

^a ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b U S DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY   (United States)

Author keywords

CAFE standards; Economic impacts; Truck diesels

Indexed keywords

CLEAN DIESEL ENGINES; LIGHT TRUCKS;

DIESEL ENGINES; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; LIGHT WEIGHT VEHICLES; MARKETING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE; STANDARDS;

ENERGY POLICY;

DIESEL ENGINE; FUEL CONSUMPTION; TRAFFIC EMISSION;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0033496787     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4215(99)00090-7     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. American Automobile Manufacturers Association, 1997. Motor Vehicle Facts & Figures: 1997. Detroit, MI, pp. 48-51.
2. Blackman A.W. The market dynamics of technological substitutions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 6:1974;41-63.
3. Brinner, R.E., 1990. Philosophy and properties of the DRI model of the US Economy. Quarterly Model of the US Economy: Version US89A, March 1990. Standard and Poor's Data Resources, Inc., Lexington, MA.
4. Cummins, A., 1998. Diesel vehicles, in greener mode, may stage comeback. Wall Street Journal, April 9, 1998, New York.
5. Davis, S.C., 1997. Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 17. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report ORNL-6819, Oak Ridge, TN.
6. Eckstein, O., 1981. Core Inflation Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 97-99.
7. General Motors Corp. (GM) 1998. General Motors, Isuzu Announce Engine Joint Venture, press release, Detroit, MI, Sept. 9.
8. Heavenrich, R., Hellman, K., 1996. Light-Duty Automotive Technology and Fuel Economy Trends through 1996, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, Report EPA/AA/TDSG/96-01, Ann Arbor, MI.
9. Mansfield E. Technical Change and Rate of Imitation. Econometrica. 29:1961;741-765.
10. Navistar International Corp., 1998. Navistar and Ford Working on New Diesel Engine, PRNewswire (news release), Chicago, IL, March 5.
11. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1996. Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 16. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report ORNL-6898, Oak Ridge, TN. pp. 3-9
12. Paul, R.A., 1979. The Impact of Future Diesel Emissions on the Air Quality of Large Cities, US Environmental Protection Agency Report EPA-45075-79-005, Research Triangle Park, NC.
13. Standard & Poor's Data Resources, Inc., 1983. U.S. Long-Term Review-Winter 1982-83, Lexington, MA. p. 11.11.
14. Standard & Poor's Data Resources, Inc., 1998a. The re-estimated DRI Model. Review of the US Economy, January 1998, Lexington, MA.
15. Standard & Poor's Data Resources, Inc., 1998b. Slowing growth and rising deficits: The trend projection, Review of the US Economy: Long Range Focus, Fall-Winter 1997-1998, February 1998, Lexington, MA.
16. Teotia A.P.S., Raju P.S. Forecasting the market penetration of new technologies using a combination of economic cost and diffusion models. Journal of Product Innovation and Management. 4:1986;225-237.
17. Tompkins, M., et al. 1998. Determinants of alternative fuel vehicle choice in the continental United States, Presented to the Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Paper No. 980965, Washington, DC.
18. US Department of Energy/Energy Information Administration (DOE/EIA), 1998a. Annual Energy Outlook 1998, Report DOE/EIA-0383 (98), Washington, DC.
19. US Department of Energy/Energy Information Administration. 1998b. Annual Energy Outlook 1998, Worksheet generated from CN6005.PRJ.NEMS.FORTRAN.FTAB.D0722931, Tables 45, 48, 50, 114, Washington, DC.
20. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, 1998. Tier 2 Report to Congress, Report EPA-420-R-98-008, Washington, DC.