Roles of the Af and Tl genes in pea leaf morphogenesis: Leaf morphology and pinna anatomy of the heterozygotes

Canadian Journal of Botany

Volumn 77, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 611-622

  Villani, Philip J ^a,b   DeMason, Darleen A ^b  

^a AUGUSTANA COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Acacia; Afila; Fabaceae; Leaf anatomy; Leaf morphology; Pisum sativum

Indexed keywords

AF GENE; EXTERNAL EAR; GENE INTERACTION; GENETIC REGULATION; GENOTYPE; HETEROZYGOSITY; LEAF MORPHOLOGY; MORPHOGENESIS; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; TI GENE;

GENES; MORPHOLOGY; MUTAGENESIS; VEGETATION;

HETEROZYGOTES; HISTOLOGY; MORPHOGENESIS;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

PISUM SATIVUM;

EID: 0033496230     PISSN: 00084026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/b99-030     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Akam, M. 1998. From master genes to micromanagers. Curr. Biol. 8: R676-R678.
2. Blixt, S. 1972. Mutation genetics in Pisum. Agric. Hortic. Genet. 30: 1-293.
3. Cleary, A.L., and Smith, L.G. 1998. The Tangled1 gene is required for spatial control of cytoskeletal arrays associated with cell division during maize leaf development. Plant Cell, 10: 1875-1888.
4. Cooke, T.J., and Lu, B. 1992. The independence of cell shape and overall form in multicellular algae and land plants: cells do not act as building blocks for construction of plant organs. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153: S7-S27.
5. Cote, R., Gerrath, J.M., Posluszny, U., and Grodzinski, B. 1992. Comparative leaf development of conventional and semileafless peas (Pisum sativum). Can. J. Bot. 70: 571-580.
6. Doebley, J., and Lukens, L. 1998. Transcriptional regulators and the evolution of plant form. Plant Cell, 10: 1075-1082.
7. Foard, D.E., and Haber, A.H. 1961. Anatomical studies of gamma-irradiated wheat growing without cell division. Am. J. Bot. 48: 438-446.
8. Goldenberg, J.B. 1965. Afila, a new mutant in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Bol. Genet. 1: 27-31.
9. Gould, K.S., Cutter, E.G., and Young, J.P.W. 1986. Morphogenesis of the compound leaf in three genotypes of pea, Pisum sativum. Can. J. Bot. 64: 1268-1276.
10. Gould, K.S., Young, J.P.W., and Cutter, E.G. 1989. Does growth rate determine leaf form in Pisum sativum? Can. J. Bot. 67: 2590-2595.
11. Gould, K.S., Cutter, E.G., and Young, J.P.W. 1992. L-System analysis of compound leaf development in Pisum sativum L. Ann. Bot. (London), 70: 189-196.
12. Gould, K.S., Cutter, E.G., and Young, J.P.W. 1994. The determination of pea leaves, leaflets and tendrils. Am. J. Bot. 81: 352-360.
13. Haber, A.H. 1962. Nonessentiality of concurrent cell divisions for degree of polarization of leaf growth without cell division. Am. J. Bot. 49: 583-589.
14. Hofer, J.M.I., and Ellis, N.T.H. 1998. The genetic control of patterning in pea leaves. Trends Plant Sci. 3: 439-444.
15. Hofmeister, W. 1867. Die Lehre von der Pflanzenzelle. Handbuch der Pflanzenphysiologie, Bd. 1, Abt. Engelmann, Leipzig.
16. Johnson, R.L., and Scott, M.P. 1998. New players and puzzles in the Hedgehog signaling pathway. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 8: 450-456.
17. Kaplan, D.R. 1992. The relationship of cells to organisms in plants: problem and implications of an organismal perspective. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153: S28-S37.
18. Kaplan, D.R., and Hagemann, W. 1991. The relationship of cell and organism in vascular plants: are cells the building blocks of plant form? BioScience, 41: 693-703.
19. w. Genetika, 2: 88-96.
20. Kujala, V. 1953. Felderbse bei welcher die ganze Blattspreite in Ranken umgewandelt ist. Arch. Soc. Zool. Bot. Fenn. Vanamo, 8: 44-45.
21. Lamm, R. 1957. Three new genes in Pisum. Hereditas, 43: 541-548.
22. Lu, B., Villani, P.J., Watson, J.C., DeMason, D.A., and Cooke, T.J. 1996. The control of pinna morphology in wildtype and mutant leaves of garden pea (Pisum sativum L.). Int. J. Plant Sci. 157: 659-673.
23. Makasheva, R.K. 1962. New forms and varieties of garden pea. Tr. Prikl. Bot. Genet. Sel. 34: 1-77.
24. Marx, G.A. 1974. A scheme for demonstrating some classical genetic principles in the classroom. J. Hered. 65: 252-254.
25. Marx, G.A. 1977. A genetic syndrome affecting leaf development in Pisum. Am. J. Bot. 65: 273-277.
26. Marx, G.A. 1987. A suite of mutants that modify pattern formation in pea leaves. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 5: 311-335.
27. Meicenheimer, R.D., Muehlbauer, F.J. Hindman, J.L., and Gritton, E.T. 1983. Meristem characteristics of genetically modified pea (Pisum sativum) leaf primordia. Can. J. Bot. 61: 3430-3437.
28. Murfet, I.C., and Reid, J.B. 1993. Developmental mutants. In Peas: genetics, molecular biology, and biotechnology. Edited by R. Casey and D.R. Davies. CAB International, Wallingford, U.K. pp. 165-216.
29. Polhill, R.M., and Van der Maesen, L.J.G. 1985. Taxonomy of grain legumes. In Grain legume crops. Edited by R.J. Summerfield and E.H. Roberts. Collins, London. pp. 3-36.
30. Punnett, R.C. 1923. Linkage in the sweet pea (Lathyrus odoratus). J. Genet. 13: 101-123.
31. Sharp, L.W. 1926. An introduction to cytology. McGraw-Hill, New York.
32. Smith, L.G., Hake, S., and Sylvester, A.W. 1996. The tangled1 mutation alters cell division orientation throughout maize leaf development without altering leaf shape. Development, 122: 481-489.
33. Villani, P.J., and DeMason, D.A. 1997. Roles of the Af and Tl genes in pea leaf morphogenesis: characterization of the double mutant (afaftltl). Am. J. Bot. 84: 1323-1336.
34. Villani, P.J., and DeMason, D.A. 1999. The Af gene regulates timing and direction of major developmental events during leaf morphogenesis in garden pea (Pisum sativum). Ann. Bot. (London), 83: 117-128.
35. Vilmorin, P.D., and Bateson, W. 1912. A case of gametic coupling in Pisum. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B Biol. Sci. 84: 9-11.
36. Waites, R., and Hudson, A. 1995. phantastica: a gene required for dorsoventrality of leaves in Antirrhinum. Development, 121: 2143-2154.
37. Waites, R., Selvandurai, H.R.N., Oliver, I.R., and Hudson, A. 1998. The Phantastica gene encodes a Myb transcription factor involved in growth and dorsoventrality of lateral organs in Antirrhinum. Cell, 93: 779-789.
38. White, O. 1917. Studies of inheritance in Pisum. II. The present state of knowledge of heredity and variation in peas. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 56: 487-588.