Public opinion and policymaking in the states: The case of post-roe abortion policy

Policy Studies Journal

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 707-722

  Norrander, Barbara ^a   Wilcox, Clyde ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABORTION; POLICY MAKING; SOCIAL POLICY;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0033495435     PISSN: 00190292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1999.tb01998.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adams, G. D. (1997). Abortion: Evidence of issue evolution. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 718-737.
2. Asher, H. B., & Van Meter, D. S. (1973). Determinants of public welfare policies: A causal approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3. Berkman, M. B., & O'Connor, R. E. (1993). Do women legislators matter? Female legislators and state abortion policy. In M. Goggin (Ed.), Understanding the new politics of abortion (pp. 268-284). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4. Brown, C., Powell, L., & Wilcox, C. (1995). Serious money: Fundraising and contributing in presidential nomination campaigns. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
5. Cohen, J. E., & Barrilleaux, C. (1993). Public opinion, interest groups, and public policy making: Abortion policy in the American states. In M. Goggin (Ed.), Understanding the new politics of abortion (pp. 203-221). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6. Cook, E. A., Hartwig, F., & Wilcox, C. (1992). The abortion issue down ticket: The Virginia lieutenant governor's race of 1989. Women and Politics, 12(4), 5-18.
7. Cook, E. A., Jelen, T. G., & Wilcox, C. (1992). Between two absolutes: Public opinion and the politics of abortion. Boulder, CO: Westview.
8. Cook, E. A., Jelen, T. G., & Wilcox, C. (1993). Catholicism and abortion attitudes in the American states: A contextual analysis. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 32(3), 223-231.
9. Cook, E. A., Jelen, T. G., & Wilcox, C. (1994). Issue voting in gubernatorial elections: Abortion and post-Webster politics. Journal of Politics, 56(1), 187-199.
10. Daynes, B. W., & Tatalovich, R. (1992). Presidential politics and abortion, 1972-1988. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 22(3), 545-562.
11. Downs, A. (1957), An economic theory of democracy. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
12. Erikson, R., Wright, G., & McIver, J. (1993). Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in the American state. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
13. Fairbanks, J. D. (1977). Religious forces and morality politics in the states. Western Political Quarterly, 50(3), 411-417.
14. Franklin, C. H., & Kosaki, L. C. (1989). Republican schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, public opinion, and abortion. American Political Science Review, 83(3), 751-771.
15. Goggin, M., & Kim, J.-K. (1992, March), Interest groups, public opinion, and abortion policy in the American states. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA.
16. Goggin, M., & Wlezien, C. (1993). Abortion opinion and policy in the American states. In M. Goggin (Ed.), Understanding the new politics of abortion (pp. 190-202). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17. Gormley, W. T. (1986). Regulatory issue networks in a federal system. Polity, 18(4), 595-620.
18. Haider-Markel, D. P., & Meier, K. J. (1996). The politics of gay and lesbian rights: Expanding the scope of conflict. Journal of Politics, 58(2), 332-349.
19. Halva-Neubauer, G. (1993). The states after Roe: No "paper tigers." In M. Goggin (Ed.), Understanding the new politics of abortion (pp. 167-189). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20. Hansen, S. (1993). Differences in public policies toward abortion: Electoral and policy context. In M. Goggin (Ed.), Understanding the new politics of abortion (pp. 222-248). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. Jackson, J. S., III, & Clayton, N. L. (1996). Leaders and followers: Major party elites, identifiers, and issues, 1980-92. In J. C. Green & D. M. Shea (Eds.), The state of the parties (2nd ed.) (pp. 328-351). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
22. Jones, B. S., & Norrander, B. (1996). The reliability of aggregated public opinion measures. American Journal of Political Science, 40(1), 295-309.
23. Klingman, D., & Lammers, W. W. (1984). The "general policy liberalism" factor in American state politics. American Journal of Political Science, 28(3), 598-610.
24. Lowery, D., & Gray, V. (1993). The density of state interest group systems. Journal of Politics, 55(1), 191-206.
25. Lowi, T. (1988). Foreword: New dimensions in policy and politics. In R. Tatalovich & B. Daynes (Eds.), Social regulatory policy (pp. x-xxi). Boulder, CO: Westview.
26. Meier, K. J. (1994). The politics of sin. Armonk, NY: M. E.. Sharpe.
27. Meier, K. J., & McFarlane, D. R. (1993). Abortion politics and abortion funding policy. In M. Goggin (Ed.), Understanding the new politics of abortion (pp. 249-267). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28. Miller, W. E., Kinder, D. R., Rosenstone, S. J., & the National Election Studies. (1993). American National Election Study: Pooled Senate Election Study, 1988, 1990, 1992 [Computer file]. 3rd release. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer], 1993. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1993.
29. Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1963). Constituency influence in Congress. American Political Science Review, 57(1), 45-57.
30. Mooney, C. Z., & Lee, M.-H. (1995). Legislating morality in the American states: The case of pre-Roe abortion regulation reform. American Journal of Political Science, 39(3), 599-627.
31. Mooney, C. Z., & Lee, M.-H. (1997, August). Morality policy in distinctive political contexts: The determinants of death penalty reform in the U.S. states, 1956-1983. Paper presented at the XVII World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Seoul, Korea.
32. Morgan, D. R., & Meier, K. J. (1980). Politics and morality: The effect of religion on referenda voting. Social Science Quarterly, 61(1), 144-148.
33. National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League. (1992). Who decides: A state-by-state review of abortion rights. Washington, DC: The NARAL Foundation.
34. Norrander, B., & Wilcox, C. (1993, April). Sources of state abortion policy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
35. O'Brien, R. M. (1990). Estimating the reliability of aggregate-level variables based on individual-level characteristics. Sociological Methods and Research, 18(4), 473-504.
36. Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1992). The rational public. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37. Quinn, B., Anderson, H., Bradley, M., Goetting, P., & Shriver, P. (1982). Churches and church membership in the United States, 1980. Atlanta, GA: Glenmary Research Center.
38. Roe v. Wade. (1973). 410 U.S. 113.
39. Rozell, M., & Wilcox, C. (1996). Second coming: The new Christian right in Virginia politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
40. Sharkansky, I. (1969). The utility of Elazar's political culture. Polity, 2(1), 66-83.
41. Stimson, J., MacKuen, M., & Erikson, R. (1995). Dynamic representation. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 543-566.
42. Tribe, L. (1990). Abortion: The clash of absolutes. New York, NY: Norton.
43. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic volunteerism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services. (1989). 492 U.S. 490.
45. Wlezien, C. (1995). The public as thermostat: Dynamics of preferences for spending. American Journal of Political Science, 39(4), 981-1000.
46. Woliver, L. R. (1998). Social movements and abortion law. In A. N. Costain & A. S. McFarland (Eds.), Social movements and American political institutions (pp. 233-250). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.