Evaluation of four automated methods for determination of whole blood cyclosporine concentrations

American Journal of Clinical Pathology

Volumn 112, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 358-365

  Hamwi, Ahmad ^a   Veitl, Mario ^a   Männer, Georg ^a   Ruzicka, Katharina ^a   Schweiger, Christian ^a   Szekeres, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

CEDIA; Cloned enzyme donor immunoassay; Cyclosporine; EMIT; Enzyme multiplied immunoassay; Fluorescence polarization immunoassay; FPIA; High performance liquid chromatography; HPLC; Method comparison

Indexed keywords

CYCLOSPORIN;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS REACTION; DRUG BLOOD LEVEL; DRUG DETERMINATION; DRUG MONITORING; ENZYME MULTIPLIED IMMUNOASSAY TECHNIQUE; FLUORESCENCE POLARIZATION IMMUNOASSAY; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0033492458     PISSN: 00029173     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/112.3.358     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Kahan BD. Cyclosporine A. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:1725-1738.
2. Lindholm A. Therapeutic monitoring of cyclosporin A: an update. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1991;41:273-283.
3. Kahan BD, Shaw LM, Holt D, et al. Consensus document: Hawk's Cay meeting on therapeutic drug monitoring of cyclosporine. Clin Chem. 1990;36:1510-1516.
4. Beutler D, Molteni S, Zeugin T, et al. Evaluation of instrumental, nonisotopic immunoassays (fluorescence polarization immunoassay and enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique) for cyclosporine monitoring in whole blood after kidney and liver transplantation. Ther Drug Monit. 1992;14:424-432.
5. Dusci LJ, Hackett LP, Chiswell GM, et al. Comparison of cyclosporine measurement in whole blood by high-performance liquid chromatography, monoclonal fluorescence polarization immunoassay, and monoclonal enzyme-multiplied immunoassay. Ther Drug Monit. 1992;14:327-332.
6. Kabra PM, Wall JH, Blanckaert N. Solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography for improved assay of cyclosporine in whole blood or plasma. Clin Chem. 1985;31:1717-1720.
7. Passing H, Bablock W. A new biometrical procedure for testing the equality of measurements from two different analytical methods: application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in clinical chemistry: part I. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1983;21:709-720.
8. De Groen PC. Cyclosporine and the liver: how one affects the other. Transplant Proc. 1990;22:1197-1202.
9. Winkler M, Schumann G, Petersen D, et al. Monoclonal fluorescence polarization immunoassay evaluated for monitoring cyclosporine in whole blood after kidney, heart, and liver transplantation. Clin Chem. 1992;38:123-126.
10. Gulbis B, Van der Haeijden J, van As H, et al. Whole Hood cyclosporine monitoring in liver and heart transplant patients: evaluation of the specificity of a fluorescence polarization immunoassay and an enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1997;15:957-963.
11. Witzke O, Heemann U, Thesing A, et al. A comparison of EMIT and FPIA methods for the detection of cyclosporin A blood levels: does impaired liver function make a difference? Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1997;52:413-416.
12. Oellerich M, Armstrong VW, Kahan B, et al. Lake Louise Consensus Conference on cyclosporin monitoring in organ transplantation: report of the consensus panel. Ther Drug Monit. 1995;17:642-654.
13. Schütz E, Svinarov D, Shipkova M, et al. Cyclosporin whole blood immunoassays (AxSYM, CEDIA, and Emit): a critical overview of performance characteristics and comparison with HPLC. Clin Chem. 1998;44:2158-2164.