Comparison of stapes prostheses: A retrospective analysis of individual audiometric results obtained after stapedotomy by implantation of a gold and a teflon piston

American Journal of Otology

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 573-580

  De Bruijn, Arthur J G ^a   Tange, Rinze A ^a   Dreschler, Wouter A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Audiometry; Gold ossicular implant; Otosclerosis; Stapedectomy; Teflon ossicular implant

Indexed keywords

GOLD; POLITEF;

ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; BONE CONDUCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEARING; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; OTOSCLEROSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; SPEECH; STAPEDOTOMY; STAPES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AUDIOMETRY; BONE CONDUCTION; FEMALE; GOLD; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSSICULAR PROSTHESIS; OSSICULAR REPLACEMENT; OTOSCLEROSIS; POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STAPES SURGERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0033490007     PISSN: 01929763     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Slattery WH, House JW. Prostheses for stapes surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1995;28:253-64.
2. Tange RA, Bruijn de AJG, Grolman W. Experience with a new pure gold piston in stapedotomy for cases of otosclerosis. Auris Nasus Larynx 1998;25:249-53.
3. Bruijn de AJG, Tange RA, Dreschler WA. Efficacy of evaluation of audiometric results after stapes surgery in otosclerosis, Part II: a method for reporting results from individual cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (submitted)
4. Marquet JFE. Technique of stapedotomy. In: Filipo R, ed. Otosclerosis. Amsterdam: Kugler & Ghedini, 1990: 83-7
5. Monsell EM, Balkany TA, Gates GA, Goldenburg RA, Meyerhoff WL, House JW. Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;113:186-7.
6. Berliner KI, Doyle KJ, Goldenberg RA. Reporting operative hearing results in stapes surgery: does choice of outcome measure make a difference? Am J Otol 1996;17:521-8.
7. Shea JJ Jr. Fenestration of the oval window. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1958;67:932-51.
8. Ginsberg IA, Hoffman SR, White TP, Stinziano GD. Hearing changes following stapedectomy: a six year follow up. Laryngoscope 1981;91:87-92.
9. Schöndorf J, Pilorget J, Gräber S. Der einfluß des Prothesentyps auf das Langzeitergebnis der Stapedektomie; ein Vergleich der Drahtprothese mit der Stahlpistonprothese nach Robinson. HNO 1980;28:153-7.
10. Perkins R, Curto FS. Laser stapedotomy: a comparative study of prostheses and seals. Laryngoscope 1992;102:1321-7.
11. Elonka DR, Derlacki EL, Harrison WH. Stapes prosthesis comparison. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1982;90:263-5.
12. Robinson M. Stapes prosthesis: stainless steel vs. Teflon. Laryngoscope 1974;84:1982-95.
13. Browning GG. The Glasgow Benefit Plot: a new method for reporting benefits from middle ear surgery. Laryngoscope 1991;101:180-5.
14. Bruijn de AJG, Tange RA, Dreschler WA, Grolman W, Schouwenburg PF. Bilateral stapedotomy in patients with otosclerosis: a disability-orientated evaluation of the benefit of second ear surgery. Clin Otolaryngol 1998;23:123-7.
15. Johansen H. Relation of audiograms to the impedance formula. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1948;74:65-75.
16. Brenkman CJ, Grote JJ, Rutten WLC. Acoustic transfer characteristics in human middle ears studied by a SQUID magnetometer method. J Acoust Soc Am 1987;82:1646-54.
17. Dass R, Grewal BS, Thapar SP. Human stapes and its variations, I: General features. J Laryngol Otol 1966;80:11-25.
18. Cottle RD, Tonndorf J. Mechanical aspects of stapedial substitution. An experimental study. Arch Otolaryngol 1966;83:547-53.
19. Richter E, Mally K, Heger F. Langzeitergebnisse der stapesplastik mit der Schuknecht-Draht-Teflon-Prosthese. Laryngo Rhino Oto 1994;73:157-9.
20. Pedersen CB. The use of a small fenestra technique with the Fisch piston in the surgical treatment of otosclerosis. J Laryngol Otol 1987;101:542-7.